Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2021.21.05.157

Effects of Selective Exposure to YouTube Political Videos on Attitude Polarization: Verifying Mediating Effects of Political Identification  

Ham, Minjeong (연세대학교 정보대학원)
Lee, Sang Woo (연세대학교 정보대학원)
Publication Information
Abstract
YouTube has rapidly grown as a news media outlet. As political content without fact-checking is actively provided and YouTube algorithms are used for content recommendations, users are selectively exposed to certain political ideologies, which could escalate conflicts among political groups. In particular, the stronger the identification of in-group, the greater the antipathy toward outgroup, and the more exposed the content to the parties that support or oppose it, the stronger the identification or the antipathy can be. This study investigated the relationship between selective exposure and political attitude polarization in the context of political video on YouTube. Based on social identity theory, this study also found that political identification mediates the relationship between selective exposure and political attitude polarization.
Keywords
YouTube; Political Videos; Selective Exposusre; Political Identification; Political Polarization;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, "Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics, Journal of Marketing Research," Vol.18, No.3, p.382, 1981.   DOI
2 E. Simas, S. Clifford, and J. H. Kirkland, "How Empathic concern fuels political polarization," American Political Science Review, Vol.114, No.1, pp.258-269, 2020.   DOI
3 J. Graham, J. Haidt, and B. A. Nosek, "Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.96, No.5, pp.1029-1046, 2009.   DOI
4 S. Iyengar and S. J. Westwood, "Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization," American Journal of Political Science, Vol.59, No.3, pp.690-707, 2014.   DOI
5 J. M. Sumiala and M. Tikka, "Broadcast Yourself-Global News! A Netnography of the "Flotilla" News on YouTube," Communication, Culture & Critique, Vol.6, No.2, pp.318-335, 2013.   DOI
6 M. Djerf-Pierre, Lindgren, and M. A. Budinski, "The Role of Journalism on YouTube: Audience Engagement with Superbug Reporting," Media and Communication, Vol.7, No.1, pp.235-247, 2019.   DOI
7 S. Greene, "Understanding Party Identification: A Social Identity Approach," Political Psychology, Vol.20, No.2, pp.393-403, 1999.   DOI
8 E. A. West and S. Iyengar, Partisanship as a Social Identity: Implications for Polarization, Political Behavior, 2020.
9 H. Tajfel and J. C. Turner, The social identity theory of intergroup behavior, In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations, Nelson-Hall Pub, 1986.
10 S. W. Webster and A. I. Abramowitz, "The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the U.S. Electorate," American Politics Research, Vol.45, No.4, pp.621-647, 2017.   DOI
11 S. Iyengar, Y. Lelkes, M. Levendusky, N. Malhotra, and S. J. Westwood, "The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States," Annual Review of Political Science, Vol.22, No.1, pp.129-146, 2019.   DOI
12 M. Wojcieszak, "Deliberation and Attitude Polarization," Journal of Communication, Vol.61, No.4, pp.596-617, 2011.   DOI
13 이정훈, "비판적 뉴스 이용 전략에 영향 미치는 요인에 대한 탐색적 연구: 뉴스 피로감, 정치적 세련도, 뉴스에 대한 지식 체계, 뉴스관의 주효과와 상호작용 효과를 중심으로," 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제19권, 제11호, pp.578-592, 2019.   DOI
14 V. Gueorguieva, "Voters, MySpace, and YouTube," Social Science Computer Review, Vol.26, No.3, pp.288-300, 2008.   DOI
15 http://www.mediatoday.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=201463
16 Reuters Institute, Reuters Institute Digital News Report, 2019.
17 I. B. Dylko, "How Technology Encourages Political Selective Exposure," Communication Theory, Vol.26, No.4, pp.389-409, 2015.   DOI
18 S. L. Gaertner, J. F. Dovidio, J. A. Nier, B. S. Banker, C. M. Ward, M. Houlette, and S. Loux, The common ingroup identity model for reducing intergroup bias: Progress and challenges. In D. Capozza & R. Brown (Eds), Social identity processes: Trends in theory and research, Sage Pub, 2000.
19 W. A. Galston, If political fragmentation is the problem, is the Internet the solution? In: Anderson DM, Cornfield M and Arterton FC (eds) The Civic Web: Online Politics and Values, Rowman & Littlefield Pub, 2002.
20 F. J. Zuiderveen Borgesius, D. Trilling, J. Moller, B. Bodo, C. H. de Vreese, and N. Helberger, "Should we worry about filter bubbles," Internet Policy Review, Vol.5, No.1, 2016.
21 E. Pariser, The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You, Penguin Press Pub, 2011.
22 S. Iyengar and K. S. Hahn, "Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use," Journal of Communication, Vol.59, No.1, pp.19-39, 2009.   DOI
23 M. Haim, A. Graefe, and H.B. Brosius, "Burst of the Filter Bubble?," Digital Journalism, Vol.6, No.3, pp.330-343, 2017.   DOI
24 B. T. Bowyer, J. E. Kahne, and E. Middaugh, "Youth comprehension of political messages in YouTube videos," New Media & Society, Vol.19, No.4, pp.522-541, 2015.   DOI
25 백강희, "포털 사이트 뉴스 이용행태, 포털 사이트 뉴스 신뢰도, 언론사 뉴스 신뢰도 간 관계에 대한 연구," 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제19권, 제10호, pp.306-314, 2019.   DOI
26 T. L. Towner and D. A. Dulio, "An Experiment of campaign effects during the YouTube Election," New media & Society, Vol.13, No.4, pp.626-644, 2011.   DOI
27 J. Cho, S. Ahmed, M. Hilbert, B. Liu, and J. Luu, "Do Search Algorithms Endanger Democracy? An Experimental Investigation of Algorithm Effects on Political Polarization," Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, Vol.64, No.2, pp.150-172, 2020.   DOI
28 D. Gefen, D. Straub, and M.C. Boudreau, "Stru ctural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guideli nes for Research Practice," Communications of th e Association for Information Systems, Vol.4, No. 7, pp.1-79, 2000.
29 C. R. Sunstein, Republic.com 2.0, Princeton University Press Pub, 2007.
30 S. Iyengar, and J. McGrady, Media and politics: A citizen's guide, W.W. Norton Pub, 2007.
31 N. J. Stroud, "Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure," Journal of Communication, Vol.60, No.3, pp.556-576, 2010.   DOI
32 노정규, 민영, "정치 정보에 대한 선택적 노출이 태도 극화에 미치는 효과-비정치적 온라인 커뮤니티 이용자들을 대상으로," 한국언론학보, 제56권, 제2호.
33 https://hrcopinion.co.kr/archives/15120
34 김대근, 임석순, 유 진, 가짜뉴스 등 허위사실 유포로 인한 사이버상 유권자의사 왜곡 방지에 관한 연구, 중앙선거관리위원회, 2017.
35 V. Bakir and A. McStay, "Fake News and The Economy of Emotions," Digital Journalism, Vol.6, No.2, pp.154-175, 2017.   DOI
36 J. Lee and Y. Choi, "Effects of network heterogeneity on social media on opinion polarization among South Koreans: Focusing on fear and political orientation," International Communication Gazette, Vol.82, No.2, pp.119-139, 2019.   DOI
37 L. Guo, J. A. Rohde, and H. D. Wu, "Who is responsible for Twitter's echo chamber problem? Evidence from 2016 U.S. election networks," Information, Communication & Society, Vol.23, No.2, pp.234-251, 2018.   DOI
38 D. Gefen, E. Rigdon, and D. Straub, "An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Administrative and Social Science Research," MIS Quarterly, Vol.35, No.2, pp.3-14, 2011.
39 R. K. Garrett, S. D. Gvirsman, B. K. Johnson, Y. Tsfati, R. Neo, and A. Dal, "Implications of Pro- and Counterattitudinal Information Exposure for Affective Polarization," Human Communication Research, Vol.40, No.3, pp.309-332, 2014.   DOI