Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2020.20.04.284

The Living Lab Model of Smart City Based on Citizen Participation  

Choi, Min-Ju (국립한밭대학교 도시공학과)
Lee, Sang-Ho (국립한밭대학교 도시공학과)
Jo, Sung-Su (국립한밭대학교 도시공학과)
Jung, Yae-Jin (국립한밭대학교 도시공학과)
Jo, Sung-Woon (국립한밭대학교 도시공학과)
Publication Information
Abstract
As a solution to local and social problems, the active use of smart city living labs is becoming increasingly important. The answer to solving local and social problems lies in the citizen and the field. The purpose of this study is to establish a smart city living lab model based on citizen participation. In this study, smart city living lab model(4P-SCLLM) based on citizen participation was established through domestic and overseas living lab methodology and case analysis. In order to evaluate the systemicity and specificity of the 4P-SCLLM, a smart city living lab model, we recently compared it with the living lab process in Busan where smart city living lab is applied. As a result of analyzing, the analysis shows similar trends in each stage, and Busan's private sector showed a similar process to 4P-SCLLM On the other hand, public and private sector cooperation and support systems were found to be less than the 4P-SCLLM model And In technology and methodology, the 4P-SCLLM model is analyzed to have a living lab process that incorporates new technologies. In order to maintain the 4P-SCLLM continuously, first, participants and stakeholders need to participate actively and communicate while collaborating on the whole process from start to finish. Second, public awareness needs to be improved. Third, continuous citizenship verification of services is needed. Fourth, citizens' constant participation is needed. Through these implications, this study proposed 4P-SCLLM as a smart city living lab model suitable for the domestic situation.
Keywords
Smart City; Living Lab; User-Centered; Bottom-Up; Citizen-Driven; Governance;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Esteve Almirall, Melissa Lee, and Jonathan Wareham, "Mapping Living Labs in the Landscape of Innovation methodologies," Technology Innovation Management Review, pp.12-18, 2012.
2 Anna Stahlbrost and Marita Holst, The Living Lab Methodology Handbook, A Transnational Nordic Smart City Living Lab Pilot, Smart IES, 2012.
3 Bernhard Katzy, "Designing Viable Business Models for Living Labs," Technology Innovation Management Review, pp.19-24, 2012.
4 조영태, 박신원, 이상훈, 오명택, 이진희, LH 스마트시티 미래비전 및 추진전략, 한국토지주택공사, 2018.
5 4차산업혁명위원회, 스마트시티 추진전략, 2018.
6 김우용, 김강민, 황태건, 황철수, "사용자 참여 리빙랩 개발 연구-주거환경을 중심으로," 대한지리학회 학술대회논문집, pp.162-163, 2019.
7 성지은, 박인용, "시스템 전환 실험의 장으로서 리빙랩: 사례분석과 시사점," 기술혁신학회지, 제19권, 제1호, pp.1-28, 2016.
8 변태근, "스마트시티 리빙랩," 도시정보, 4월호, pp.20-23, 2019.
9 이상호, 조성수 "스마트시티와 스마트 방재 서비스," 한국방재학회지, 제18권, 제4호, pp.6-11, 2018.
10 조영태, "스마트시티 국내.외 현황," 도시문제, 제52권 제580호, pp.20-21, 2017.
11 남광우, 임두현, "스마트시티, 시민과 함께 하는 리빙랩," 도시정보, 제412권, pp.17-18, 2016.
12 강명구, 이창수, "스마트도시 개념의 변화와 비교," 한국지역개발학회지, 제27권, 제4호, pp.45-63, 2015.
13 성지은, 정서화, 한규영, "사회문제 해결형 기술개발사업에서의 리빙랩 적용 사례 분석," 과학기술학연구, 제18권, 제1호, pp.177-217, 2018.
14 김보연, "지역혁신 방법론, 전북형 '리빙랩'을 찾아서 (4) 세계 리빙랩 포럼-(하)성공 관건은 코크레이션.지속적인 실험과 환류," 전북일보, 2019.10.01.
15 성지은, 이유나, "스마트시티 리빙랩 사례 분석과 과제," 동향과 이슈, 제47권, pp.1-37, 2018.
16 P. Ballon, J. Pierson, and S. Delaere, "Test and Experimentation Platforms for Broadband Innovation: Examining European practice," SSRN, 1331557, 2005.
17 송위진, "Living Lab: 사용자 주도의 개방형 혁신모델," Issues & Policy, 제59권, 2012.
18 A. Folstad, "Living Labs for Innovation and AND Development of Information and Communication Technology: A Literature Review," The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organization & Networks, Vol.10, pp.99-131, 2008.
19 G. Patrycja, Embedding a Living Lab approach at the University of Edinburgh, The university of Edinburgh, 2015.
20 S. S. Intille, K. Larson, J. S. Beaudin, J. Nawyn, E. M. Tapia, and P. Kaushik, "A Living Laboratory for the Design and Evaluation of Ubiquitous Computing Technologies," In CHI'05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, pp.1941-1944, 2005.
21 백남철, "스마트시티 서비스 리빙랩," 정보과학회지, 제36권, 제7호, pp.69-73, 2018.
22 4차산업혁명위원회, 스마트시티 국가 시범도시 기본구상 발표, 2018.
23 김경화, 백종인, 손철희, 반영운, "마을 만들기의 주민참여 활성화 요인 도출," 도시행정학보, 제28권, 제2호, pp.267-285, 2015.
24 김상민, "주민자치와 협력적 마을만들기," 한국지방자치학회보, 제28권, 제1호, pp.181-209, 2016.
25 김상민, 김현호, 하혜수, "대성동 마을만들기의 거버넌스 특성 분석," 한국지역개발학회지, 제28권, 제4호, pp.155-183, 2016.
26 최문형, 김인제, 정문기, "주거환경관리사업에서의 협력적 거버넌스," 한국지방자치학회보, 제27권, 제4호, pp.179-208, 2015.
27 Seppo Leminen, Mika Westerlund, and Anna-Greta Nystrom, "Living Lab as Open-Innovation Networks," Technology Innovation Management Review, Carleton University, pp.7-11, 2012.
28 성지은, 정병걸, "리빙랩 방법론: 현황과 과제," STEPI Insight, 제208권, 2017.
29 Angelo Corallo, Maria Elena Latino, and Neglia Grazia, Methodology for User-Centered Innovation in Industrial Living Lab, ISRN Industrial Engineering, 2013.