Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2020.20.03.678

The Compare Physical and Psychological Functioning by Sex, Weight and Age in Judo Athletes  

Kim, Hye-Young (삼육대학교 물리치료학과)
Chung, Eun-Jung (안동과학대학교 물리치료과)
Lee, Byoung-Hee (삼육대학교 물리치료학과)
Publication Information
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the physical and psychological functioning by sex, weight and age in Judo athletes. The 124 participants; high school students, college students, and team players. They used physical tests to measure physical examinations by self-describing Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score test, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score test, and Oswestry Disability Index, and psychological tests such as Profile of Mood Test, Athletes' Self-Management Questionnaire, and The Athletic Coping Skills Inventory-28, to examine the effects of physical and psychological functions of sports athletes. The physical tests of sex showed differences in knee and back, psychological tests of sex showed differences in mood state, self-management, and athletic coping skills. As a result of physical examination by weight, there was a difference in knee pain and sports items, psychological tests showed that there was a significant difference in mood state except for vitality. Physical examination by age showed differences in knee, ankle, and back. As a result of age-based psychological test, mood state test showed difference in all items except tension and vitality. There was a significant difference only in the items of physical management in self-management test. The results of this study are expected to be used as a basic data for sports injury training and medical technology development by sex, weight and age of Judo athletes.
Keywords
Judo Athletes; Physical Function; Psychological Function;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 허정훈, 운동선수 자기관리 측정도구의 구조적 타당화와 인과모형 검증, 중앙대학교, 박사학위논문, 2001.
2 김판곤, 박광진, 이강헌, "프로와 아마추어 축구선수들의 심리기술과 자기관리 특성 분석," 코칭능력개발지, 제11권, 제1호, pp.55-66, 2009.
3 김종탁, "격투기 운동선수들의 자기관리가 운동만족 및 자신감에 미치는 영향," 대한무도학회지, 제11권, 제3호, pp.305-318, 2009.
4 C. L. Ardern, N. F. Taylor, J. A. Feller, and K. E. Webster, "Return-to-sport outcomes at 2 to 7 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery," The American Journal of Sports Medicien, Vol.40, No.1, pp.41-48, 2012.   DOI
5 이충섭, "청소년 복싱선수들의 인지평가와 대처기술전략의 관계에서 정서의 매개효과," 한국스포츠심리학회지, 제25권, 제1호, pp.77-88, 2014.
6 유수진, 대학 운동선수들의 긍정심리자본이 성취목표 지향성.운동성과.운동소진에 미치는 영향, 목표대학교, 석사학위논문, 2017.
7 서승석, 정경칠, 김영목, "슬관절 손상에 대한 국문 Knee Injury and Osteoarathritis Outcome Score[KOOS]의 적용을 통한 타당성, 신뢰성 및 반응성 평가," 대한정형외과학회지, 제41권, 제3호, pp.441-453, 2006.   DOI
8 E. M. Roos and L. S. Lohmande "The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): From joint injury to osteoarthritis," Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Vol.3, No.1, p.64, 2003.
9 E. M. Roos, S. Brandsson, and J. Karlsson, "Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction," Foot & Ankle International, Vol.22, No.10, pp.788-794, 2001.   DOI
10 J. L. Davidson and, J. L. Keating, "A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness," Physical Therapy, Vol.82, No.1, pp.8-24, 2002.   DOI
11 이옥진, 김미예, "기분상태검사(POMS)의 타당화," 한국여성체육학회지, 제20권, 제4호, pp.121-133, 2006.
12 유승준, 청소년 볼링 선수들의 경기대처 기술특성 분석, 인천대학교, 석사학위논문, 2002.
13 박석래, 고등학교 운동선수들의 자기관리전략 분석, 순천대학교, 석사학위논문, 2003.
14 문한식, 박진성, "양궁선수의 자기관리와 자신감과의 관계," 한국스포츠심리학회지, 제9권, 제1호, pp.19-32, 2008.
15 정성우, 표내숙, "체조선수의 자기관리가 자신감에 미치는 영향," 한국스포츠심리학회지, 제20권, 제4호, pp.229-242, 2009.
16 A. Yasuyoshi, J. H. Jung, and S. E. Koh, "Neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves strength, pain and weight distribution on patients with knee instability postsurgery," Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Science, Vol.3, No.2, pp.112-118, 2014.   DOI
17 박기준, 엘리트 유도 및 레슬링 선수들의 스포츠 손상 특성, 삼육대학교, 석사학위논문, 2015.
18 김용호, 이소미, "레슬링선수의 자기관리와 정신력의 관계," 한국스포츠리서치, 제18권, 제1호, pp.133-142, 2007.
19 김병준, "운동선수 자기관리행동의 측정," 체육과학연구, 제14권, 제4호, pp.125-140, 2003.
20 U. Johnson and A. Ivarsson, "Psychosocial factors and sport injuries: Prediction, prevention and future research directions," Current Opinion in Psychology, Vol.16, pp.89-92, 2017.   DOI