Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2020.20.01.001

The Effect of Scaffolding on Creative Collaborative Performance - Focusing on the Mediating Effects of Boundary Objects -  

Shin, Hyun-Sun (이화여대 경영학부)
Kym, Hyo-gun (이화여대 경영학부)
Na, Yun-Bin (고려사이버대학교 문화예술경영학과)
Publication Information
The Journal of the Korea Contents Association / v.20, no.1, 2020 , pp. 1-15 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study examined the factors that influence creative performance in corporate collaboration projects. Specifically to facilitate team collaboration, we identified that scaffolding, which is one of the important factors in organizational learning communication, and the Boundary Objects, which are collaboration tools & vehicle, influence performance. The survey was collected for 203 employees who experienced collaborative projects, and three-step mediated regression analysis was conducted after conducting exploratory factor analysis. In other words, we examined the median effect of boundary objects on the impact of scaffolding on creative collaborative performance. Analysis showed that while the effects of the boundary objects in relation to the impact of cognitive scaffolding on creative performance were not significant, emotional scaffolding had a full-scale effect on the creative performance and also had a full-scale effect on the efficacy performance. Given these results, it is necessary to share a vision and form personal relationships among team members in order to activate them, since scaffolding is useful in organizational learning and boundary objects also have some effect as a medium for promoting collaboration in projects.
Keywords
Scaffolding; Creative Collaboration Performance; Boundary Object; Organizational Learning; Communication;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 A. L. Brown, A. S. Palincsar, and B. B. Armbruster, "Instructing comprehension-fostering activities in interactive learning situations," Learning and comprehension of text, pp.255-286, 1984.
2 Judith A. Langer and Arthur N. Applebee, "Reading and Writing Instruction: Toward a Theory of Teaching and Learning," Stanford University, Vol.13, No.1, pp.171-194, 1986.
3 L. Vygotsky, "Interaction between learning and development," Readings on the development of children, Vol.23, No.3, pp.34-41, 1978.
4 L. E. Berk and A. Winsler, "Scaffolding Children's Learning: Vygotsky and Early Childhood Education," NAEYC Research into Practice Series, Vol.7, National Association for the Education of Young Children, 1509 16th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036-1426 (NAEYC catalog# 146), 1995.
5 S. E. Wolf and T. Brush, "Using the Big Six Information Skills as a Metacognitive Scaffold To Solve Information Based Problems," School Library Media Research, Vol.6, 2000.
6 L. R. Roehler and D. J. Cantlon, "Scaffolding: A powerful tool in social constructivist classrooms," Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues, 1. 1997.
7 K. D. Simons and J. D. Klein, "The impact of scaffolding and student achievement levels in a problem-based learning environment," Instructional science, Vol.35, No.1, pp.41-72, 2007.   DOI
8 J. Tudge, Vygotsky, the zone of proximal development, and peer collaboration: Implications for classroom practice, Cambridge University Press, 1992.
9 G. Spinelli, M. Perry, and K. O'Hara, "Understanding complex cognitive systems: the role of space in the organisation of collaborative work," Cognition, Technology & Work, Vol.7, No.2, pp.111-118, 2005.   DOI
10 L. K. Michaelsen, W. E. Watson, and R. H. Black, "A realistic test of individual versus group consensus decision making," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.74, No.5, p.834, 1989.   DOI
11 M. S. Ackerman and C. Halverson, "Organizational memory: processes, boundary objects, and trajectories," Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, HICSS-32, 1999.
12 P. Chelladurai and H. A. Riemer, "A Classification of The Facets of Athlete Satisfaction," Journal of Sport Management, Vol.11, pp.133-159, 1997.   DOI
13 김한주, 황윤섭, "연구개발 특성이 기업 연구 성과에 미치는 영향 분석 -국제화된 한국 중소기업을 중심으로," 통상정보연구, 제9권, 제4호, pp.395-413, 2007.
14 Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, 창의성의 즐거움, 노혜숙 옮김, 북로드, 1996.
15 D. M. Harrington, "The ecology of human creativity: A psychological perspective," Sage Publications, Inc. Vol.115, pp.143-169, 1990.
16 C. A. Mockros and M. Csikszentmihalyi, "The social construction of creative lives. In The Systems Model of Creativity," Springer Netherlands, pp.127-160, 2014.
17 S. Taggar, "Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.45, No.2, pp.315-330, 2002.   DOI
18 C. K. D. Dreu, "Team innovation and team effectiveness: The importance of minority dissent and reflexivity," European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol.11, No.3, pp.285-298, 2002.   DOI
19 T. Meijer, C. Reezigt, van der Bij, M. Schilder, and H. Broekema, Interrelations between team flexibility, team creativity and project success: A multi-stakeholder approach, University of Groningen. 2012.
20 R. C. Hanke, Team creativity: A process model, Smeal College of Business, 2006.
21 T. M. Amabile, "A model of creativity and innovation in organizations," Research in organizational behavior, Vol.10, No.1, pp.123-167, 1998.
22 A. D. Ancona and D. F. Caldwell, "Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams," Administrative science quarterl, pp.634-665, 1992.
23 M. A. Campion, E. M. Papper, and G. J. Medsker, "Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension," Personnel psychology, Vol.49, No.2, pp.429-452, 1996.   DOI
24 R. M. Stock, "Interorganizational teams as boundary spanners between supplier and customer companies," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.34, No.4, pp.588-599, 2006.   DOI
25 G. R. Oldham and A. Cummings, "Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work," Academy of management journal, Vol.39, No.3, pp.607-634, 1996.   DOI
26 N. Madjar, G. R. Oldham, and M. G. Pratt, "There's no place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees' creative performance," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.45, No.4, pp.757-767, 2002.   DOI
27 C. M. Savelsbergh, B. L. van der Heijden, and R. F. Poell, "The development and empirical validation of a multidimensional measurement instrument for team learning behaviors," Small Group Research. 2009.
28 D. J. Ferreira, and G. L. dos Santos, "Scaffolding online discourse in collaborative ill-structured problem-solving for innovation," Informatics in Education-An International Journal, Vol.8, No.2, pp.173-190, 2009.   DOI
29 D. Schon, The reflective practitioner, Basic Books, 1983.
30 M. Ragan, Building better human service systems: Integrating services for income support and related programs, The Institute, 2003.
31 D. Swartz, Culture and power. The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997.
32 E. Wenger, Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity, Cambridge university press. 1998.
33 S. M. Land and C. Zembal-Saul, "Scaffolding reflection and articulation of scientific explanations in a data-rich, project-based learning environment: An investigation of progress portfolio," Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol.51, No.4, pp.65-84, 2003.   DOI
34 P. R. Carlile, "A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development," Organization science, Vol.13, No.4, pp.442-455, 2002.   DOI
35 D. Wood, J. S. Bruner, and G. Ross, "The role of tutoring in problem solving," Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, Vol.17, No.2, pp.89-100, 1976.   DOI
36 송선희, "Vygotsky 의 비계설정(scaffolding) 이론에 대한 고찰," 교육방법연구, 제15권, pp.77-93, 2003.
37 R. Boutellier, O. Gassmann, H. Macho, and M. Roux, "Management of dispersed product development teams: The role of information technologies," R&D Management, Vol.28, No.1, pp.13-25, 1998.   DOI
38 P. Schepers and P. T. Van den Berg, "Social factors of work-environment creativity," Journal of business and psychology, Vol.21, No.3, pp.407-428, 2007.   DOI
39 A. Fong, R. Valerdi, and J. Srinivasan, "Boundary objects as a framework to understand the role of systems integrators," In Systems Research Forum, World Scientific Publishing Company, Vol.2, No.1, pp.11-18, 2007.
40 이미정, 쓰기 상호평가적 협의에서 또래간 비계설정의 양상, 대구교육대학교, 석사학위논문, 2010.
41 S. L. Star and J. R. Griesemer, "Institutional ecology, translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39," Social studies of science, Vol.19, No.3, pp.387-420, 1989.   DOI
42 N. Levina and E. Vaast, "The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: implications for implementation and use of information systems," MIS quarterly, Vol.29, No.2, pp.335-363, 2005.   DOI
43 B. A. Bechky, "Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor," Organization science, Vol.14, No.3, pp.312-330, 2003.   DOI
44 S. Leigh Star, "This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept," Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol.35, No.5, pp.601-617, 2010.   DOI
45 J. S. Brown and P. Duguid, "Organizing knowledge," California management review, Vol.40, No.3, pp.90-111, 1998.   DOI
46 Mary Kathryn Henderson, "Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering," Science, Technology & Human Values, Vol.16, No.4, pp.448-473, 1991.   DOI
47 Gunaratne, Junius, et al. "Using Evolutionary Prototypes to Formalize Product Requirements," Siemens Corporate Research, NJ, 2004.
48 N. J. Fox, "Boundary objects, social meanings and the success of new technologies," Sociology, Vol.45, No.1, pp.70-85, 2011.   DOI
49 R. A. Cooke and J. L. Szumal, "The impact of group interaction styles on problem-solving effectiveness," The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol.30, No.4, pp.415-437, 1994.   DOI
50 D. Van Knippenberg, J. F. Dawson, M. A. West, and A. C. Homan, "Diversity faultlines, shared objectives, and top management team performance," human relations, Vol.64, No.3, pp.307-336, 2011.   DOI