Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2020.20.12.547

Work, Labor! What do you think about ? ; Using the Q-methodology  

Lee, Soon-Hee (군자어린이집)
Jung, Myoung-Ja (공주대학교 대학원)
Lee, Doh-Hee (공주대학교 대학원)
Publication Information
The Journal of the Korea Contents Association / v.20, no.12, 2020 , pp. 547-554 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study attempted to examine how we really think about our daily duties, work, and labor, and what it means. In particular, in this study, using the Q-methodology, one of the "qualitative studies," diagnosed and categorized general workers' thoughts about their work and labor. Accordingly, the following analysis results were derived. First, as a result of the analysis, three types were derived, and the types were named as follows based on the Q statement emphasized by each type. emphasizes statements such as 'blessing/happiness', 'rest', 'lover', and 'reward' for work, and labor was named 「Positive Type」. was named as 「Negative Type」 because statements such as 'painfulness', 'the beginning of the day', 'duty', and 'war' were emphasized. In , 'colleagues and friends' and 'learning' were positive, and 'beginning of the day', 'duty', and 'rest' were expressed as negative statements, so it was named as 「Positive Neutral Type」. 'Work' and 'labor', which are indispensable beings in our daily life, are blessings that must be done, happiness, and co-workers and friends, but the value of their existence is possible when appropriate 'resting' is assumed. In addition, Q methodology is expected to be confirmed as an empirical study in the future, as well as usefulness as a hypothesis abductive approach.
Keywords
Work; Value of Labor; Quality Study; Q-methodology; Hypothesis Abductive Approach;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 홍기빈 역, 21세기 기본소득: 자유로운 사회, 합리적인 경제를 향한 거대한 전환득, 필리페 판 파레이스, 야니크 판데르보흐트, 흐름출판, 2018.
2 W. Stephenson, The Play Theory of Mass Communication, Chicago and London: The University of chicago Press, 1967.
3 S. E. Moriarty, "Abduction: A theory of visual interpretation," Communication Theory, Vol.6, No.2, pp.167-187, 1996.   DOI
4 서근원, "질적연구 수행의 의미," 교육학연구, Vol.46, No.3, pp.133-161, 2008.
5 R. S. Brown, Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science, Yale University Press. New Haven, Massm 1980.
6 백상용, "질적연구의 의미와 한계 : 양적연구와의 비교를 통하여," 정보시스템연구, Vol.15. No.1, pp.239-254, 2006.
7 W. Stephenson, "Consciousness Out-Subjectivity in," The Psychological Record, Vol.18, p.500, 1968.   DOI
8 김흥규, Q방법론:과학철착, 이론, 분석 그리고 적용, 커뮤니케이션북스, 2008.
9 이도희, 이동규, "질적연구방법론을 활용한 비영리회계 인식의 가설발견적 접근," 회계연구, Vol.12, No.1, pp.281-308, 2007.
10 이도희, 김선경, "Q방법을 활용한 재무행정 인식의 유형화," 사회과학연구, Vol.25, No.4, pp.159-178, 2014.
11 다음백과사전(https://100.daum.net)
12 조우연, 이도희, "사회복지법인 운영 인식의 가설발견적 접근," 지역사회복지연구, No.43, pp.1-30, 2012.
13 이도희, 문태형, "21세기 대학의 회계교육 인식에 대한 가설발견적 접근," 회계연구, 제22권, 제5호, pp.1-23, 2017.
14 김흥규, "주관성 연구를 위한 Q방법론의 이해," 간호학논문집, Vol.6, No.1, pp.1-12, 1992.
15 W. Stephenson, "Scientific Creed. Philosophical Credo," The Psychological Record, Vol.11, pp.9-17, 1961.   DOI
16 이도희, 기현희, 김주희, "회계정보연구에서 질적연구방법 활용에 대한 소고," 재무와회계정보저널, Vol.19. No.4, pp.45-62, 2019.
17 J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative and quantitative Approaches, Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage, 1994.
18 R. S. Brown, The History and Principles of Q Methodology in Psychology and the Social Sciences, Kent State University, Ohio. 1997.
19 염성수, 이도희, "21세기 '복지경영'을 생각해보다!: Q방법론을 활용하여," 경영교육연구, Vol.34, No.4, pp.303-324, 2019.
20 이도희, 김다요, 박행님, "나의 배우자를 생각해보다: 주관성 연구를 활용하여," 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, Vol.18, No.3, pp.320-329, 2018.   DOI
21 Keith P. Sanders, William Stepenson: The Study of Behavior, MCR, Dec. 1974.
22 김흥규, "Q방법론의 유용성," 주관성연구, 통권제1호, pp.15-33, 1996.
23 조영복 역, 사회적기업(사회적기업 연구총서 2010-1): 다양성과 역동성 배경과 공헌, 시그마프레스, 2010.
24 박영균, 노동가치, 책세상, 2019.
25 안응렬, 하느님이시요 사람이신 그리스도의 시 제1권, 크리스찬출판사, 1988.
26 김경일, 노동(한국개념사총서 9), 소화, 2013.
27 최승노, 노동의 가치(스토리 시장경제 7), 일하는 기쁨, 내 인생의 성공 드라마, 프리이코노미스쿨, 2015.