Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2019.19.10.385

Analysis of the Characteristics of Free-riding Learner in Online Collaborative Learning  

Lee, Eun-Chul (백석대학교)
Publication Information
Abstract
This study was conducted to explore the characteristics of learner who showed free riding behavior in online collaborative learning. For this, 290 students from three universities in the metropolitan area were studied. The collected data are as follows. Learner characteristics are learning strategy, learning motivation, academic retardation behavior, and learning disposition. Interaction distinguished between frequency and type of message. Interaction levels were collected with frequency. The subjects with less than 5 interaction frequencies were defined as free-riding students. 43 students were classified as free riders. Learner characteristics were analyzed by cluster analysis. As a result, the learner characteristics were divided into five groups. All the free riding students belonged to 4 groups. The learner characteristics of 4 groups are as follows. First, the level of the learning strategy is very low. Second, learning motivation has a high tendency toward performance - oriented approach and high tendency to avoid performance. This tends to deliberately avoid learning. Third, the level of delayed behavior is high. This is deliberately putting off student activities. Fourth, learning tendency is high in academic anxiety, task value, self efficacy and learning belief are very low. This is a lack of confidence in learning.
Keywords
Online Collaborative Learning; Interaction; Learner Characteristics; Free Riding; Free Riding Characteristics;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 이은철, "온라인 협력학습에서 학습동기가 상호작용에 미치는 영향 분석," 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제17권, 제7호, pp.416-424, 2017.   DOI
2 P. R. Pintrich, D. A. F. Smith, T. Garcia, and W. J. McKeachie, "A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning," The University of Michigan, 1991.
3 A. D. Cohen, Andrew, "Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language," Harlow: Pearson Longman, 2011.
4 L. R. Pinninti, "Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies: An Indian Context," The Reading Matrix, Vol.1, pp.179-193, 2016.
5 이은철, "온라인 협력학습 과정의 참여 수준에 대한 학습전략의 영향 탐색," 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제18권, 제6호, pp.63-72, 2018.   DOI
6 이은철, "온라인 협력학습에서 학습동기가 상호작용수준에 미치는 영향 탐색," 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제17권, 제7호, pp.416-424, 2017.   DOI
7 이은철, "온라인 협력학습에서 학습동기 유형에 따라 교수메시지에 대한 반응행동 탐색," 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제18권, 제5호, pp.514-524, 2017.   DOI
8 M. Goroshit, "Academic procrastination and academic performance: An initial basis for intervention," Prevention & Intervention Community, Vol.46, No.2, pp.131-142, 2018.   DOI
9 P. Steel, "Arousal, avoidant and decisional procrastination: do they exist?," Personality and Individual Differences, Vol.48, pp.926-934, 2010.   DOI
10 조수연, 정선영, "전체과제제시와 부분과제연습이 학습자의 사전인지기능에 따라 문제해결과 인지부하에 미치는 영향," 아시아교육연구, 제12권, 제2호, pp.159-188, 2011.
11 H. Bouta, S. Retalis, and F. Paraskeva, "Utilising a collaborative macro-script to enhance student engagement: A mixed method study in a 3D virtual environment," Computers & Education, Vol.58, No.1, pp.501-517, 2012.   DOI
12 M. J. Dingel, W. Wei, and A. Huq, "Cooperative learning and peer evaluation: The effect of free riders on team performance and the relationship between course performance and peer evaluation," Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol.13, No.1, pp.45-56, 2013.
13 G. C. Ruel, A. Nauta, and N. Bastiaans, Free-riding and team performance in project education, University of Groningen, 2003.
14 이은철, "온라인 협력학습 환경에서 상호작용 및 학업성취 수준에 대한 협력스크립트 형태의 토론 성찰일지 작성의 효과성 검증," 교육공학연구, 제33권, 제2호, pp.239-267, 2017.
15 J. Moskaliuk, J. Kimmerle, and U. Cress, "Wiki-supported learning and knowledge building: effects of incongruity between knowledge and information," Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol.25, pp.549-561, 2009.   DOI
16 Z. R. de. Yolanda and Z. Victoria Zenotz, "Learning strategies in CLIL classrooms: how does strategy instruction affect reading competence over time?." Received, Vol.29, pp.319-331, 2017.
17 K. Makitalo-Siegl, C. Kohnle, and F. Fischer, "Computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning and classroom scripts: Effects on help-seeking processes and learning outcomes," Learning and Instruction, Vol.21, No.2, pp.257-266, 2011.   DOI
18 이은철, "라포 수준에 따른 집단 구성이 온라인 협력학습 환경에서 상호작용에 미치는 영향," 교육학연구, 제51권, 제3호, pp.57-82, 2013.
19 이은철, "학습자의 자기결정성 유형과 수준이 온라인 협력학습 환경에서 상호작용에 미치는 영향," 열린교육연구, 제21권, 제2호, pp.91-110, 2013.
20 이은철, 김민정, "위키(wiki) 기반 협력학습 지원을 위한 통합적 지원 모형 개발 및 효과성 검증," 교육공학연구, 제28권, 제3호, pp.587-617, 2012.
21 P. Gunning and O. L. Rebecca, "Children's Learning Strategy Use and the Effects of Strategy Instruction on Success in Learning ESL in Canada," System, Vol.43, pp.82-100, 2014.   DOI
22 R. Hamalainen and P. Hakkinen, "Teachers' instructional planning for computer-supported collaborative learning: Macro-scripts as a pedagogical method to facilitate collaborative learning," Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol.26, No.4, pp.871-877, 2010.   DOI
23 이은철, "온라인 학습 환경에서 고성취 집단의 학습과정에서 나타난 상호작용 분석," 교육공학연구, 제31권, 제2호, pp.159-190, 2015.
24 T. Anderson, "Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions," In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, pp.129-144, 2003.