Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2015.15.08.053

Content Analysis on the Component of Two-sided eWOM  

Park, Hyun Hee (경북대학교 경영학부)
Jeon, Jung Ok (부경대학교 경영학부)
Publication Information
Abstract
This study analyzed online word-of-mouth information using content analysis to help practical categorization of two-sided eWOM. A total of 402 online consumer reviews on search goods and experience goods were collected. Descriptive characteristics(information direction, length of review line) and content structural characteristics(product benefit types, information presentation methods) were used as analysis criteria. The study results are as follows. First, the types of two-sided e-WOM direction were made of positive/negative, negative/positive, positive/negative/ positive, and negative/positive/negative. Second, the length of two-sided eWOM was longer than the length of one-sided eWOM and blended type accounted for the highest proportion both one-sided and two-sided eWOM at the aspect of product benefit. Third, holistic presentation method was overwhelmingly high in one-sided eWOM, whereas blended and analytic presentation methods were somewhat high in two-sided eWOM. Fourth, holistic presentation method was high in search goods, whereas blended and analytic presentation methods were high in experience goods. Based on these results, implications for two-sided e-WOM study and further research issues were discussed.
Keywords
Two-sided eWOM; Content Analysis; Descriptive Characteristics of eWOM; Content Structural Characteristics of eWOM;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 K. M. Elliott, Understanding Consumer-to-Consumer Influence on the Web, Doctoral Dissertation, Duke University, 2002.
2 박찬, 유창조, "온라인에서의 구전커뮤니케이션이 상표평가에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 상표사용후기와 답글을 중심으로", 소비자학연구, 제17권, 제1호, pp.73-93, 2006.
3 성영신, 박진영, 박은아, "온라인 구전정보가 영화 관람의도에 미치는 영향: '기대'를 중심으로", 광고연구, 제27권, pp.31-52, 2002.
4 이진희, 도선재, 황장선, "제품관련 온라인 구전 (e-WOM)의 효과: 방향성, 유용성, 상호작용 성향(IR)의 역할", 한국심리학회지: 소비자.광고, 제 12권, 제2호, pp.283-307, 2011.
5 이태민, 박철, "온라인 구전정보의 방향성과 유형이 구매영향력에 미치는 효과: 한국과 미국의 국제비교", 마케팅연구, 제21권, 제1호, pp.29-56, 2006.
6 Z. Chen and N. H. Lurie, "Temporal Contiguity and Negativity Bias in the Impact of Online Word of Mouth," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.50, No.4, pp.463-476, 2013.   DOI
7 C. Park and T. M. Lee, "Information Direction, Web site Reputation and e-WOM Effect: A Moderating Role of Product Type," Journal of Business Research, Vol.62, pp.61-67, 2009.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 김소현, "온라인 구전정보는 소비자 설득을 위한 정보인가? 가치 있는 정보인가?", 광고연구, 제96 권, pp.7-46, 2013.
9 유창조, 안광호, 방선이, "온라인 구전정보 방향성 과 동의수준이 소비자평가에 미치는 영향: 웹사이 트 상에서의 실험설계를 바탕으로", 소비문화연구, 제12권, 제4호, pp.27-46, 2009.
10 B. Berelson, Content Analysis in Communication Research, New York: Free Press, 1952.
11 H. H. Kassarjian, "Content Analysis in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.4, No.1, pp.8-18, 1977.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 박승현, 장정헌, "온라인 영화 리뷰의 내용과 품질에 관한 탐색적 연구", 언론과학연구, Vol.12, No.4, pp.221-256, 2012.
13 S. M. Mudambi and D. Schuff, "What Makes a Helpful Online Review? A Study of Customer Reviews on Amazon.com," MIS Quarterly, Vol.34, No.1, pp.185-200, 2010.   DOI
14 J. M. Brister, "Word of Mouth Communication and Their Effects in Consumer Network," Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.18, pp.155-169, 1991.
15 J. J. Brown and P. H. Reingen, "Social Tie and Word of Mouth Referral Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.14, No.3, pp.350-362, 1987.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 R. E. Petty and J. T. Cacioppo, "The Effects of Involvement on Response to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.46, No.1, pp.69-81, 1984.   DOI
17 P. F. Bone, "Determinants of Word of Mouth Communication During Product Consumption," Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.19, No.1, pp.579-583, 1992.
18 오재신, 강태경, 허미옥, "사용후기의 양과 품질이 구전수용 및 구전의도에 미치는 영향: 지식과 관여도의 조절효과를 중심으로", 인터넷전자상거래연구, 제10권, 제1호, pp.81-103, 2010.
19 D. Godes and D. Mayzlin, "Using Online Conversations to Study Word of Mouth Communication," Marketing Science, Vol.23, No.4, pp.545-560, 2004.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 W. Duan, B. Gu, and A. B. Whinston, "Do Online Reviews Matter?: An Empirical Investigation of Panel Data," Decision Support Systems, Vol.45, No.4, pp.1007-1016, 2005.   DOI
21 박철, 정수연, "온라인 소비자 구전에 대한 내용 분석: 사이트 유형과 제품유형에 따른 차이를 중심으로", 광고연구, 제70권, pp.91-118, 2006.
22 안광호, 임미화, "제품편익이 브랜드 애착과 브랜드 몰입에 미치는 영향: 제품유형과 자기감시성의 조절적 효과", 소비자학연구, 제19권, 제1호, pp.169-189, 2008.
23 J. P. Peter and J. C. Olson, Consumer Behavior: Marketing Strategy Perspective, Homewood, IL: Irwin, 1999.
24 H. Assael, Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action(6th ed.), South-Western College, Boston, 1998.
25 J. Gutman, "A Means end Chain Model Based on Consumer Categorization Processes," Journal of Marketing, Vol.46, No.2, pp.60-72, 1982.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 R. Batra and O. T. Ahtola, "Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Sources of Consumer Attitudes," Marketing Letters, Vol.2, No.2, pp.159-170, 1991.   DOI
27 K. L. Keller, "Conceptualizing Measuring and Managing Customer-based Brand Equity," Journal of Marketing, Vol.57, No.1, pp.1-22, 1993.   DOI
28 한정민, 디자인 혁신속성의 차원과 효과연구: 기능적 편익과 상징적 편익의 매개효과를 중심으로, 단국대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, 2014.
29 R. Chitturi, R. Raghunathan, and V. Mahajan, "Delight by Design: The Role of Hedonic versus Utilitarian Benefits," Journal of Marketing, Vol.72, No.3, pp.48-63, 2008.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 R. L. Underwood, "The Communicative Power of Product Packaging: Creating Brand Identity via Lived and Mediated Experience," Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol.11, No.1, pp.62-76, 2003.   DOI
31 E. C. Hirschman and M. B. Holbrook, "Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions," Journal of Marketing, Vol.46, No.3, pp. 92-101, 1982.   DOI
32 S. Fournier and D. G. Mick, "Rediscovering Satisfaction," Journal of Marketing, Vol.63, No.4, pp.5-23, 1999.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 H. Mano and R. L. Oliver, "Assessing the Dimensionality and Structure of the Consumption Experience: Evaluation, Feeling, and Satisfaction," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.20, No.3, pp.451-466, 1993.   DOI   ScienceOn
34 D. MacInnis and L. Price, "The Role of Imagery in Information Processing: Review and Extensions," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.13, No.4, pp.473-491, 1987.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 D. V. Thompson and R. W. Hamilton, "The Effects of Information Processing Mode on Consumers' Responses to Comparative Advertising," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.32, No.4, pp.530-540, 2006.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 R. L. Oliver, T. S. Robertson, and D. J. Mitchell "Imaging and Analyzing in Response to New Product Advertising," Journal of advertising, Vol.22, No.4, pp.35-50, 1993.
37 양윤, 김윤정, "백촉불여일견? 백견불여일촉?: 감각단서, 접촉욕구, 정보처리유형이 인지반응과 제품평가에 미치는 영향", 한국심리학회지: 소비자.광고, 제12권, 제2호, pp.329-347, 2011.
38 T. Childers, M. Houston, and S. Heckler, "Measurement of Individual Differences in Visual versus Verbal Information Processing," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.12, pp.125-134, 1985(9).   DOI   ScienceOn
39 M. Sujan, "Consumer Knowledge: Effects of Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.12, No.1, pp.31-45, 1985.   DOI   ScienceOn
40 전성률, 박현진, "부정적 구전정보의 유형에 따른 구전효과의 차이에 관한 연구", 소비자학연구, 제14권, 제4호, pp.21-44, 2003.
41 O. Holsti, Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
42 T. Anderson, L. Rourke, D. R. Garrison, and W. Archer, "Assessing Teaching Presence in a Computer Conference Context," Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol.5, No.2, pp.1-17, 2001.
43 E. Poldner, P. R. J. Simons, G. Wijngaards, and M. F. van der Schaaf, "Quantitative Content Analysis Procedures to Analyse Students' Reflective Essays: A Methodological Review of Psychometric and Edumetric Aspects," Educational Research Review, Vol.7, No.1, pp.19-37, 2012.   DOI   ScienceOn
44 P. J. Nelson, "Information and Consumer Behavior," Journal of Political Economy, Vol.78, No.2, pp.311-329, 1970.   DOI   ScienceOn
45 전성률, 김경호, "온라인에서 양면구전이 소비자의 브랜드 태도에 미치는 영향", 마케팅연구, 제27권, 제1호, pp.45-66, 2012.
46 J. Singh, "Consumer Complaint Intentions and Behavior: Definitional and Taxonomical Issue," Journal of Marketing, Vol.52, No.1, pp.93-107, 1988.   DOI   ScienceOn