Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.02.254

Analysis of Research Trends in the Welfare Field of Public Administration  

Ryu, Sang-Il (세한대학교)
Hyun, Taik-Soo (고려대학교)
Publication Information
The Journal of the Korea Contents Association / v.13, no.2, 2013 , pp. 254-262 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine recent trends in the welfare field of Public Administration. Research trends in the welfare field of Public Administration show that welfare-related research has rapidly and quantitatively expanded since 2000 and there were many studies using theories. In addition, it has been discovered that there have been many welfare-related and government centered studies that used empirical (statistical) analysis. On the other hand, the centrality of research keywords was analyzed by using language network methodology. "welfare" was set as the central axis and "Policy", "deciding factor", "ideology" were set as a small central axis. The research keywords, such as "OECD", "elderly", "local government", "service", "nation", "regions", "administration", "satisfaction", "women", "market","budget"were influencing.
Keywords
Modern Welfare; Welfare Administration Studies; Research Trend Analysis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 한국행정학회(http://www.kapa21.or.kr).
2 양재진, 한국 복지정책 60년: 발전주의 복지체제의 형성과 전환의 필요성, 한국행정학보, 제42권, 제2호, 2008.
3 신상준, 복지행정학의 연구대상: 복지행정학의 정립을 위한 시론, 한국행정학보, 제12권, 1978.
4 김태수, 백종섭, 신희영, 복지행정론, 서울: 대영문화사, 2003.
5 한국정책학회(http://www.kapa.or.kr).
6 신동면, 경제위기 이후 이명박 정부 사회복지정책의 평가와 대안, 한국정책학회보, 제18권 제4호, 2009.
7 R. L. Pinkley, Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.75, pp.117-126, 1990.   DOI
8 박한우, L. Leydesdorff, 한국어 내용분석을 위한 KrKwic 프로그램의 이해와 적용: Daum.net에서 제공된 지역혁신에 관한 뉴스를 대상으로, Journal of the Korean Data Analysis, Vol.6, No.5, 2004.
9 M. L. Doerfel and S. L. Connaughton, Semantic networks and competition: Election year winners and losers in U.S. televised presidential debates, 1960-2004, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol.60, No.1, pp.201-218, 2009.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 R. E. Rice and J. A. Danowski, Is it really just like a fancy answering machine? Comparing comments and semantic networks about voice mail, Journal of Business Communication, Vol.30, pp.369-397, 1993.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 심준섭, 언어네트워크분석 기법을 활용한 갈등 프레임의 분석, 한국행정연구, 제20권, 제2호, 2011.
12 D. H. Jonassen, K. Beissner, and M. Yacci, Structural Knowledge. Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1993.
13 김용학, 사회연결망분석, 박영사, 2001.
14 손동원, 사회네트워크 분석, 경문사, 2005.
15 L. Freeman, Centrality in Social Networks : Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks, Vol.1, pp.215-239, 1979.