Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.08.087

Objective Image Quality Measurement Model : Focus on Dynamic Range, Noise, Resolution, Color Reproduction, and Preference  

Park, Hyung-Ju (중앙대학교 첨단영상대학원 영상학과)
Har, Dong-Hwan (중앙대학교 첨단영상대학원 영상학과)
Publication Information
Abstract
We propose that a subjective image quality assessment based on objective image quality factors in order to evaluate objectively preference of consumers. In other words, we define objective image quality factors which are easy to accept by manufacturers and they are composed of subjective image quality assessment questionnaires. Also, portrait image is selected by stimulus in order to persue easiness of evaluation for the general subjects. Throughout a subjective image quality assessment model, we evaluate recognition of image quality by consumers and analyze the effectiveness of correlation in terms of the final image quality preference. Analyzing the relationship between image quality factors, we can figure out the preferable image quality and confirm the positive effects on consumers' recognition of image quality. In the results, there are strong relationship between preference and color reproduction, dynamic range, noise, and resolution respectively. especially, the characteristic of portrait, there is high correlation between color reproduction and preference.
Keywords
Digital Camera; Image Quality; Preference; Objective Measurement; Subjective Assessment;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 ITU-R Rec. BT. 500-11., Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures, International Telecommunication Union, 2002.
2 ISO 20462, Photography - Psychophysical experimental methods to estimate image quality, International Organization for Standardization. 2004.
3 정우현, 한재현, 박수진, 신수진, "사진의 시각적 속성 평가와 감성 반응의 비교를 통한 감성모형 검증", 한국사진학회지, 제15호, pp.52-59, 2006.
4 J. Radun, T. Leisti, J. Hikkinen, H. Ojanen, Jean-Luc Ilives, T. Vuori, and G.Nyman, Content and Quality: Interpretation - Based Estimation of Image Quality, ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, Vol.4, No.4, p.21, 2008.
5 장은혜, 최상섭, 이경화, 손진훈, "TV 화질에 대한 감성평가 척도 개발", 감성과학회지, 제12권, 제1호, pp.121-12, 2009.
6 박형주, 하동환, "객관적 화질 평가와 주관적 화질 평가의 상관관계 연구", 한국콘텐츠학회지, 제11권, 제8호, pp.68-76, 2011.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
7 J. Clark, D. Hertel, B. Hultgen, and L. Scarff, Subjective and Objective Image Quality Evaluation, CPIQ Working Group Workshop, 2006.
8 ISO 12233, Photography-Electronic Still-picture Cameras-Resolution measurements, International Standard Organization, 2000.
9 노연숙, 사진의 감성적 만족도에 근거한 주관적 화질 평가 방법 연구, 중앙대학교 첨단영상대학원 박사학위논문, 2010.
10 N. E. Dalal, R. Rasmussen, F. Nakaya, A. P. Crean, and M. Sato, "Evaluating the overall image quality of hardcopy output," IS&T PICS conference, 1998.
11 ISO 15739, Photography-Electronic still-picture imaging-Noise measurements, International Standard Organization, 2003.
12 김선주, 디지털 카메라의 최적 화질 평가에 관한 연구, 연세대학교 공학대학원 전자공학 전공 석사학위논문, 2006.
13 CPIQ Initiative Phase 1 White Paper, Fundamentals and review of considered test methods, International Imaging Industry Association, 2007.
14 ISO 14524, Photography-Electronic Still-picture Cameras-methods for measuring Opto- Electronic Conversion Fuctions (OECFs), International Standard Organization, 2005.
15 박형주, 하동환, "디지털카메라의 노이즈감소기능이 이미지 해상도에 미치는 영향", 한국콘텐츠학회지, 제9권, 제5호, pp.91-98, 2009.   과학기술학회마을   DOI