Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.07.065

Signifier of Father on the Traditional Fairy Tale『Le petit chaperon rouge『 and the Korean Film ＜Uncle＞  

Kim, Guyl-Hun (전북대학교 인문대학 프랑스학과)
Publication Information
The Journal of the Korea Contents Association / v.12, no.7, 2012 , pp. 65-75 More about this Journal
Abstract
Throughout the agraian society, industrial society, information society, and the knowledge-based society, the word father has become the representation of the law, oder, control, protection, and discipline. This study, with traditional fairy tale "Le petit chaperon rouge", aim to analyze the child readers a notion familly around 'me' and conceiving the father as the unit of the institution; also, in the Korean film , cinema audiences feeling keenly the necessity of the conventional family values and looking for the poster of principal agent of law and order. Generally the father is protector of 'me' and simutaneously, is incorporal being; even if he is inessential, he has, only by the name, great influence with people(law, order, control, discipline, are operating only with the name as the father God does). Our study will show how the signifier father operates and what similarity is between the film and the traditional fairy tale. A father is recognized as a tyrant or criminal, but a man is always realized to undertake a duty of resisting unjust powers and protecting nonperson. Those opposing structures was well represented in epic works such as"Le petit chaperon rouge" and . The father described in children's tale appeared as a symbol of desire and oppression, therefore youngster readers realized around 'Me' the concept of family through the absence of a father and received the father as a unit in the system. A father in a film has been described as a protector of nonperson, and a main part in the institution and order of traditional family. In both genre, the psychological signifiant of father still has been shown based on the symbol of father as a social institution.
Keywords
Signifier of Father; a Patriarchal Ideology; the Father as a Social Institution;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 C. Jones, 방문숙, 이호영 역, 케임브리지 프랑스사, 시공사, 2003. 104쪽
2 B. Bettelheim, Psychanalyse des contes de fees, Pluriel, 1976. p.35
3 B. Bettelheim, Psychanalyse des contes de fees, Pluriel, 1976. pp.251-273,
4 S. Freud, Family romances, SE 9, pp.237-241,
5 Francesco Casetti,, Les theories du Cinema depuis 1945, Natan, 1999. pp.245-249.
6 Francesco Casetti,, Les theories du Cinema depuis 1945, Natan, 1999. p.248
7 M. Foucault, Histoire de la sexualite, Gallimard, 1984.
8 M. Foucault, 이규현 역, 앏의 역사, 나남, p.70, 1993.
9 M. Foucault, 이규현 역, 앏의 역사, 나남, pp.69-90.1993.
10 J. Weeks, 서동진외 역, 섹슈얼리티: 성의 정치, 현실문화연구, p.49, 1997.
11 J. Weeks, 서동진외 역, 섹슈얼리티: 성의 정치, 현실문화연구, p.37, 1997.
12 조선화, "아버지와 관련된 국내 학술지 논문의 연구 동향 분석", 한국놀이 치료학회, 2001년.
13 Francesco Casetti,, Les theories du Cinema depuis 1945, Natan, 1999. 12.
14 Francesco Casetti,, Les theories du Cinema depuis 1945, Natan, 1999. 12. pp.6-10
15 프로이트, 김종엽 역, 토템과 타부, 문예마당, 1995.
16 Grimm The Brothers, The complete Grimm's fairly tales, New York, Pantheon Books, 2005. 참고.
17 S. B, Poulter, 송종용 역, Father Factor: how your father's legacy impacts your career(모든 인간관계의 핵심요소) 아버지, 씨앗을 뿌리는 사람, 2007.
18 M. Bowie, 이종인 역, 자크 라캉, 시공사, 2003. pp.135-179,
19 B. Bettelheim, Psychanalyse des contes de fees, Pluriel, 1976.
20 B. Bettelheim, Psychanalyse des contes de fees, Pluriel, 1976. pp. 175-182
21 B. Bettelheim, Psychanalyse des contes de fees, Pluriel, 1976. p. 179.
22 B. Bettelheim, Psychanalyse des contes de fees, Pluriel, 1976. p.178.
23 B. Bettelheim, Psychanalyse des contes de fees, Pluriel, 1976. p.167.
24 B. Bettelheim, Psychanalyse des contes de fees, Pluriel, 1976. p.163.