Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.02.182

Linguistic Analysis of Human Sensibility in Various Pictorial Images  

Noh, Yeon-Sook (중앙대학교 첨단영상대학원 CT연구소)
Har, Dong-Hwan (중앙대학교 첨단영상대학원 영상학과)
Publication Information
The Journal of the Korea Contents Association / v.12, no.2, 2012 , pp. 182-195 More about this Journal
Abstract
Pictorial Images are often used when persuading someone, since people believe that photographs tell us what happened in reality. This paper aims to strengthen the role of pictorial images as a powerful method of persuasion through interpolating sensibility, which is a key factor in decision making, into the pictorial images. This paper analyses the structure of sensibility in pictorial images, in order to draw out specific factors that arouse positive impression. Furthermore, intensional meanings were given to various factors that compose the sensibility of pictorial images, and the factors are prioritized to enhance applicability. Recognitions of the sensibility in pictorial images differ due to diverse variables, but the photographed subjects themselves and the specific attributes of picture quality are the primary factors that influence the recognition. In order to achieve general and detailed results, broadly selected shooting subjects and images that have various picture quality attributes.
Keywords
Image; Structure; Contents; Evaluation; Sensitivity; Photography; Quality;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 I3A(International Imaging Industry Association), Fundamentals and review of considered test methods, CPIQ Initiative Phase 1 White Paper, 2007.
2 ISO 20462, Photography - Psychophysical experimental methods to estimate image quality, International Organization for Standardization, 2004.
3 ISO 3664, Viewing conditions - Graphic technology and photography, International Organization for Standardization, 2000.
4 ITU-R Rec. BT. 500-11, Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures, 2002.
5 J. Radun, T. Leisti, J. Hakkinen, H. Ojanen, Jean-Luc Ilives, T. Vuori, and G. Nyman, "Content and Quality: Interpretation -Based Estimation of Image Quality," ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, Vol.4, No.4, p.21, 2008.
6 J. Clark, D. Hertel, B. Hultgen, and L. Scarff, "Subjective and Objective Image Quality Evaluation," CPIQ Working Group Workshop, 2006.
7 D. Mark, Fairchild, Color Appearance Model, WILEY, 2007.
8 C. E. sgood, G. J. Suci, and P. H. Tannenbaum, The measurement of meaning. Urbana, University of Illinois Press, 1957.
9 S. R. Fernandez, M. D. Fairchild, and K. Braun, "Analysis of observer and cultural variability while generating "preferred"color reproductions of pictorial images," Journal of Imaging Science and Technology, Vol.49, No.1, pp96-104, 2005.
10 S. N. Yendrikhovskij, F. J. J. Blommaert, and H. de Ridder, "Representation of memory prototype for an object color," Color Research and Application, Vol.24, No.6, pp52-67, 1999.   DOI
11 김은영, "국어 감정 동사 연구", 전남대학교대학원 박사학위논문, 2004.
12 노연숙, 하동환, "사진의 주관적 화질 평가 방법; 요인 분석을 통한 평가 항목 선정을 중심으로", 한국콘텐츠학회지, 제10권, 제8호, pp186-197, 2010.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
13 박수진, 정우현, 현재현, 신수진, "사진 이미지와 관련된 감성 어휘 분석 및 색 유무에 따른 감성 반응 비교", 한국감성과학회지, 제7권, 제1호, pp41-49, 2004.   과학기술학회마을
14 박형주, "객관적 화질 평가 요소를 기반으로 한 주관적 화질 평가 방법 연구", 중앙대학교 첨단영상대학원 박사학위 논문, 2011.
15 신수진, 한재현, 정우현, 박수진, "사진영상의 표현양식 기술체계를 위한 기법과 심미적 인상의 관계 분석", 한국사진학회지, 제11호, pp72-79, 2004
16 신순자, 형용사의 분류, 어문논집, 숙명여대 국문학과, 1991.
17 양병화, 다변량 데이터 분석법의 이해, 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스. 2006.
18 이구형, "감성과 감정의 이해를 통한 감성의 체계적 측정 평가", 감성과학회지, 제1권, 제1호, pp.113-122, 1998.   과학기술학회마을
19 이구형, "인간감성의 특징과 감성측정 평가 방법", 한국감성과학회 연차학술대회논문집, pp37-42, 1997.
20 장은혜, 최상섭, 이경화, 손진훈, "TV 화질에 대한 감성평가 척도 개발", 감성과학회지, 제12권, 제1호, pp121-128, 2009.
21 정현원, 나건, "감성 평가를 위한 감성의 의미 재정립과 어휘 체계에 관한 연구", 대한인간공학회, 제26권, 제3호, pp17-25, 2007.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
22 C. Boust, H. Brettel, F. Vienot, S. Berche, and G. Alquie, "Color Enhancement of Digital images by Experts and Preference Judgments by Observer," The Journal of imaging science and technology, Vol.50, No.1, pp.1-11, 2006.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 B. W. Keelan, Handbook of Image Quality; Characterization and Prediction, New York: Marcel Dekker, 2002.