Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2010.10.5.343

Radiation Dose during Fluoroscopy at the Organ from Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy  

Moon, Sung-Ho (삼성서울병원 비뇨기과)
Jung, Hong-Ryang (한서대학교 방사선학과)
Lim, Cheong-Hwan (한서대학교 방사선학과)
Publication Information
The Journal of the Korea Contents Association / v.10, no.5, 2010 , pp. 343-350 More about this Journal
Abstract
We measured the radiation exposure for 55 persons (male: 36, female: 19) who was diagnosed with kidney and ureter stones and received ESWL. The absorbed dose was measured at the organ which is expected to absorb relatively much radiation (kidney, bladder, liver). The radiation dose measurement voltage 80kVp, current of 5mA as a fixed model of the human body by using the Rando phantom with Radiophotoluminescent Glass Dosimeter. Absorbed dose was measured for two times (5 minute and 10 minute, each) and converted to effective dose. Mean number of treatment was 1.8 times (1~4) per patient was the mean time of radiation exposure533 seconds (248-2516). For the treatment of right renal stone, the effective dose of right kidney, left kidney, liver and bladder was 2.458mSv, 0.152mSv, 1.404 mSv and 0.019mSv, respectively. For the treatment of left renal stone, the effective dose of right kidney, left kidney, liver and bladder was 2.496mSv, 0.252mSv, 0.178 mSv, and 0.017mSv, respectively. For the treatment of distal ureter stone, the effective dose of right kidney, left kidney and bladder was 0.009mSv, 0.01mSv and 3.742mSv, respectively.
Keywords
ESWL; Rando Phantom; RPL Glass Dosimeter; Fluorotime; Radiation Dose;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 B. F Wall and D. Hart, Revised radiation dose for typical X-ray examinations, Br J Radiol, pp.437-439, 1997.
2 F. M. Edwards, “Dose response models and methods of risk prediction and causation estimation,” Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 16, pp.118-130, 1987.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 E. R. Ritenour, “Health effects of low level radiation: carcinogenesis, teratogenesis and mutagene sis,” Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 16, pp.106-107, 1986.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Radiaition and your patient a guide for medical practitioners, National commission on radiological protection and measurement report 85, Pergamon, Oxford, pp.9-1, 2001.
5 C. Haussy, E. Schmiedt, D. Jocham, W. Brendel, B. Forssmann, Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves, Lancet, pp.1265-1268, 1980.
6 P. Sandilos, I. Tsalafoutas, G. Koutsokalis, and P. Karaiskos, “Radiation doses to patients from extracorporeal shock wave ithotripsy,” Health phys, Vol.90, No.6, pp.583-587, 2006.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 K. Perisinakis, J. Damilakis, P. Anezinis, I. Tzagaraki, and H. Varveris, “Assessment of patint effective radiation dose and associated radiogenic risk from extracorporeal shok wave lithotripsy,” Health Phys, Vol.83, No.6, pp.947-853, 2002.
8 F. L Vanswearingen, D. L Mccullough, R. Dyer, and B. Appel, “Radiation exposure to patients during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy,” J Urol 138, pp.18-20, 1987.
9 W. Huda, J. Bews, and A. P. Saydak, “Radiation doses in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy,” Br J Radiol 62, pp.921-926, 1989.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 W. H Bush, D. Jones, and R. P. Gibbons, “Radiation dose to patient and personnel during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy,” J Urol138, pp.716-719, 1987.
11 김병훈, 정영철, 장혁수, 박철희, “시술자에 따른 체외충격파쇄석술의 성공률”, 대한비뇨기과학지, 제46권, 제3호, pp.270-274, 2005.
12 A Macnamara and P Hoskins, “Patient radiation dose during lithotripsy,” Br J Radiol72, pp.495-498, 1999.   DOI
13 정일형, 양대열, 김하영, “초음파 조준장치를 이용한 중부요관 결석의 정위치 체외충격파쇄석술”, 대한비뇨기과학지, 제44권, 제2호, pp.134-138, 2003.
14 R. F. Bury, “Radiation hazards in urological practice,” BJU Int 89, pp.505-509, 2002.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedure. National commission on radiological protection and measurement report 85, Pergamon, Oxford, pp.1-48, 2000.
16 Recommendation of the international commission on radiological protection, National commission on radiological protection and measurement report 60, Pergamon, Oxford, pp.1-3, 1991.