Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2010.22.4.489

Behavior of Columns Due to Variation of Performance Influencing Factors Based on Performance Based Design  

Yun, Sung-Hwan (Dept. of Civil Engineering, Hanyang University)
Choi, Min-Choul (Structure Division, Seoyeong Engineering Co., Ltd.)
Kang, Yoon-Sig (Dept. of Civil Engineering, Hanyang University)
Park, Tae-Hyo (Dept. of Civil Engineering, Hanyang University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute / v.22, no.4, 2010 , pp. 489-498 More about this Journal
Abstract
The performance evaluation of reinforcement concrete structure is carried out as a function of the following performance influencing factors: (1) the strength of concrete, (2) longitudinal reinforcement, (3) transverse reinforcement, (4) aspect ratio, and (5) axial force. With various values of the five parameters, eigenvalue analysis and non-linear static analysis were performed to investigate the structural yield displacement, yield basis shear force, and static performance of ductility ratio. In addition, the performance evaluation is carried out according to the modified capacity spectrum method (FEMA-440) using the results of non-linear static analysis, and the effect of each parameter on performance point is analyzed. Based on the result of eigenvalue analysis and non-linear static analysis indicates, that the natural period and the ductility ratio are affected more by the structural properties than the material properties. In case of the analysis of the criterion of performance points, the effect of section shape is one of the important factors together with natural period and ductility ratio.
Keywords
performance evaluation; performance influencing factor; eigenvalue analysis; non-linear static analysis; modified capacity spectrum method;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., and Park, R., “Theoretical Stress-Strain Model for Confined Concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 114, No. 8, 1988, pp. 1804-1826.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Elnashai, A. S., Papanikolaou, V., and Lee, D. H., “ZeusNLA Program for Inelastic Dynamic Analysis of Structures,” Mid-America Earthquake Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA, 2001, 139 pp.
3 Lee, D. H., Kim, D. K., and Park, T. H., “Earthquake Response Analysis of RC Bridges Using Simplified Modeling Approaches,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 324, Nos. 3-5, 2009, pp. 640-665.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Ang, B. G., Priestley, M. J. N., and Park, R., “Ductility of Reinforced Bridge Piers Under Seismic Loading,” Report 81-3, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, February, 1981, 109 pp.
5 Park, R. and Sampson, R. A., “Ductility of Reinforced Concrete Sections in Seismic Design,” ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 69, No. 9, 1972, pp. 543-551.
6 Priestley, M. J. N. and Park, R., “Strength and Ductility of Concrete Bridge Columns Under Seismic Loading,” ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 84, No. 1, 1987, pp. 61-76.
7 Dodd, L. L. and Cooke, N., “Capacity of Circular Bridge Columns Subjected to Base Excitation,” ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 97, No. 2, 2000, pp. 297-307.
8 ATC, “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings,” ATC-40 Report, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, 1996, pp. 8-1-8-66.
9 UBC-97, “Uniform Building Code,” International Conference of Building Officials, 1997, 492 pp.
10 Li, B. and Park, R., “Confining Reinforcement for High-Strength Concrete Columns,” ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 101, No. 3, 2004, pp. 314-324.
11 Razvi, S. and Saatcigglu, M., “Confinement Model for High-Strength Concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 125, No. 3, 1999, pp. 281-288.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 FEMA, “Improvement on Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures,” FEMA-440, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 2005, pp. 6-1-6-10.