Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2009.21.4.389

Behavior and Capacity of Compression Lap Splice in Confined Concrete with Compressive Strength of 40 and 60 MPa  

Chun, Sung-Chul (Architectural Technology Research Team, Daewoo Institute of Construction Technology, Daewoo E&C Co.,Ltd)
Lee, Sung-Ho (Architectural Technology Research Team, Daewoo Institute of Construction Technology, Daewoo E&C Co.,Ltd)
Oh, Bo-Hwan (Architectural Technology Research Team, Daewoo Institute of Construction Technology, Daewoo E&C Co.,Ltd)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute / v.21, no.4, 2009 , pp. 389-400 More about this Journal
Abstract
A compression lap splice can be calculated longer than a tension lap splice in high strength concrete according to current design codes. Including effects of transverse reinforcement, a compression splice becomes much longer than a tension splice. Effects of transverse reinforcement and bar size on strength and behavior of compression lap splice, which always exist in actual structures, have been investigated through experimental study of column tests with concrete strength of 40 and 60 MPa. The results of the tests with bar diameters of 22 and 29 mm show that there is no size effect of bar diameter on compression lap splice. Bond strength of small bar diameter may increase. However, large diameters of re-bars are used in compression member and the size effect of re-bars does not have to be considered in compression lap splice. Confined specimens have twice of calculated strengths by current design codes. New design equations for the compression lap splice including the effects of transverse reinforcement are required for practical purpose of ultra-high strength concrete. End bearing is enhanced by transverse reinforcement placed at ends of splice not by transverse reinforcement within splice length. As more transverse reinforcement are placed, the stresses developed by bond linearly increase. The transverse reinforcements at ends of splice a little improve the strength by bond. Because the stresses developed by bond in compression splice with transverse reinforcement are nearly identical to or less than those in tension splice with same transverse reinforcement, strength increment of compression splice is attributed to end bearing only.
Keywords
compression lap splice; bond; end bearing; transverse reinforcement; bar size;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Furche, J. and Eligehausen, R., “Lateral Blow-Out Failure of Headed Studs Near a Free Edge,” Anchors in Concrete-Design and Behavior, SP-130, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 1991, pp. 235-252
2 ACI Committee 349, “Commentary on Code Requirement for Nuclear Safety-Related Concrete Structures (ACI 349-97),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 1997, 33 pp.
3 Azizinamini, A., Chisala, M., and Ghosh, S. K., “Tension Development Length of Reinforcing Bars Embedded in High Strength Concrete,” Engineering Structures, Vol. 17, No. 7, 1995, pp. 512-522   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Cairns, J., “Strength of Compression Splices: A Reevaluation of Test Data,” ACI Journal, Vol. 82, No. 4, 1985, pp. 510-516
5 한국콘크리트학회, 콘크리트구조설계기준 해설, 한국콘크리트학회, 2008, 523 pp.
6 Arthur, P. D. and Cairns, J., “Compression Laps of Reinforcement in Concrete Colulmns,” The Structural Engineer, Vol. 56, No. 13, 1978, pp. 9-12, 19
7 ACI Committee 408, “Bond and Development of Straight Reinforcing Bars in Tension (ACI 408R-03),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI., USA, 2003, 49 pp.
8 Darwin, D., “Concrete Q&A-Splice Length Anomaly,”Concrete International, Vol. 27, No. 10, Oct. 2005, 96 pp.
9 천성철, 이성호, 오보환, “횡보강근 없는 40, 60 MPa 콘크리트에서 철근 압축이음의 거동과 강도,” 콘크리트학회 논문집, 21권, 3호, 2009, pp. 291-302   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Cairns, J. and Arthur, P. D., “Strength of Lapped Splices in Reinforced Concrete Columns,” ACI Journal, Proceedings, Vol. 76, No. 2, 1979, pp. 277-296
11 ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-08) and Commentary,” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich., USA, 2008, 465 pp.
12 Orangun, C. O., Jirsa, J. O., and Breen, J. E., “A Reevaluation of Test Data on Developoment Length and Splices,”ACI Journal, Proceedings, Vol. 74, No. 3, 1977, pp. 114-122
13 CSA A23.3-04, “Design of Concrete Structures,” Canadian Standard Associate,” Ontario, Canada, 2004, 214 pp.
14 NZS 3101:2006, “Concrete Structures Standard,” New Zealand Standard, Wellington, New Zealand, 2006
15 Comite Euro-International du Beton, “CEB-FIP Model Code,”London, Thomas Telford, 1990, 437 pp.
16 Canbay, E. and Frosch, R. J., “Bond Strength of Lap-Spliced Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 102, No. 4, 2005, pp. 605-614
17 Pfister, J. F. and Mattock, A. H., “High Strength Bars as Concrete Reinforcement, Part 5: Lapped Splices in Concentrically Loaded Columns,” Journal, PCA Research and Development Laboratories, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1963, pp. 27-40.
18 Leonhardt, F. and Teichen, K.-T., Compression Joints of Reinforcing Bars (Drucke-St$\ddot{o}$sse von Bewehrungsst$\ddot{a}$ben), Deutscher Ausschuss f$\ddot{u}$r Stahlbeton, Berlin, 1972