Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12717/DR.2017.21.3.229

A Simple Confocal Microscopy-based Method for Assessing Sperm Movement  

Kim, Sung Woo (Animal Genetic Resources Research Center, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Kim, Min Su (Animal Genetic Resources Research Center, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Kim, Chan-Lan (Animal Genetic Resources Research Center, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Hwang, In-Sul (Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Jeon, Ik Soo (Animal Genetic Resources Research Center, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Publication Information
Development and Reproduction / v.21, no.3, 2017 , pp. 229-235 More about this Journal
Abstract
In the field of reproductive medicine, assessment of sperm motility is a key factor for achieving successful artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization, or intracellular sperm injection. In this study, the motility of boar sperms was estimated using real-time imaging via confocal microscopy. To confirm this confocal imaging method, flagellar beats and whiplash-like movement angles were compared between fresh and low-temperature-preserved ($17^{\circ}C$ for 24 h) porcine sperms. Low-temperature preservation reduced the number of flagellar beats from $11.0{\pm}2.3beats/s$ (fresh sperm) to $5.7{\pm}1.8beats/s$ and increased the flagellar bending angle from $19.8^{\circ}{\pm}13.8^{\circ}$ (fresh) to $30.6^{\circ}{\pm}15.6^{\circ}$. These data suggest that sperm activity can be assessed using confocal microscopy. The observed motility patterns could be used to develop a sperm evaluation index and automated confocal microscopic sperm motility analysis techniques.
Keywords
Confocal microscope; Sperm motility; Low Temperature preservation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Foote RH, Henderson CR, Bratton RW (1951) Some biases to consider in measuring fertility in artificial insemination. J Dairy Sci 34:490.
2 Holt C, Holt WV, Moore HD, Reed HC, Curnock RM (1997) Objectively measured boar sperm motility parameters correlate with the outcomes of on-farm inseminations: Results of two fertility trials. J Androl 18:312-323.
3 Immler S, Pryke SR, Birkhead TR, Griffith SC (2010) Pronounced within-individual plasticity in sperm morphometry across social environments. Evolution 64:1634-1643.   DOI
4 Kozdrowski R, Dubiel A, Bielas W, Dzieciol M (2007) Two protocols of cryopreservation of goat semen with the use of computer-assisted semen analysis system. Acta Veterinaria Brno 76:601-604.   DOI
5 Lavara R. Moce E, Lavara F, De Castro MPV, Vincente JS (2005) Do parameters of seminal quality correlate with the results of on-farm inseminations in rabbits? Theriogenology 64:1130-1141.   DOI
6 Menkveld R, Holleboom CA, Rhemrev JP. (2011) Measurement and significance of sperm morphology. Asian J Androl 13:59-68.   DOI
7 Morales PK, Overstreet JW (1988) The relationship between the motility and morphology of spermatozoa in human semen. J Androl 9:241-247.   DOI
8 Patel DV, McGhee CN (2007) Contemporary in vivo confocal microscopy of the living human cornea using white light and laser scanning techniques: a major review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 35:71-88.   DOI
9 Phillips DM (1972) Comparative analysis of mammalian sperm motility. J Cell Biol 53:561-573.   DOI
10 Rikmenspoel R (1965) The tail movements of bull spermatozoa. Observations and model calculations. Biophys J 5:365-392.   DOI
11 Smith KD, Rodriguez-Rigau LJ, Steinberger E (1977) Relation between indices of sperm analysis and pregnancy rate in infertile couples. Fertil Steril 28:1314-1319.   DOI
12 Suttle JM, Moore HDM, Peirce EJ, Breed WG (1988) Quantitative studies on variation in sperm head morphology of the hopping mouse, Notomys alexis. J Exp Zool 247:166-171.   DOI
13 Verstegen J, Iguer-Ouada M, Onclin K (2002) Computer assisted semen analyzers in andrology research and veterinary practice. Theriogenology 57:149-179.   DOI
14 King GJ, Macpherson JW (1973) A comparison of two methods for boar semen collection. J Anim Sci 36:563-565.   DOI
15 Vyt P, Maes D, Rijsselaere T, Dejonckheere E, Castryck F, Soom AV (2004) Motility Assessment of porcine spermatozoa: A comparison of methods. Reprod Dom Anim 39:447-453.   DOI
16 Ward PI (1998) Intraspecific variation in sperm size characters. Heredity 80:655-659.   DOI
17 Yoshida M, Yoshida K (2011) Sperm chemotaxis and regulation of flagellar movement by $Ca^{2+}$. Mol Hum Repord 17:457-465.   DOI
18 Amann RP (1989) Can the fertility potential of a seminal sample be predicted accurately? J Androl 10:89-98.   DOI
19 Amann RP, Wabersk D (2014) Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA): Capabilities and potential developments. Theriogenology 81:5-17.   DOI
20 Amelar RD, Dubin L, Schoenfeld C (1973) Semen analysis. An Office technique. Urology 2:607-611.
21 Barros C, Fujimoto M, Yanagimachi R (1973) Failure of zona penetration of hamster spermatozoa after prolonged preincubation in a blood serum fraction. J Reprod Fertil 35:89-95.   DOI
22 Betancourt M, Resendiz A, Fierro ECYR (2006) Effect of two insecticides and two herbicides on the porcine sperm motility patterns using computer-assistedsemen analysis (CASA) in vitro. Reprod Toxicol 22:508-512.   DOI
23 Coetzee K, Kruger TE, Lombard CJ (1999) Repeatability and variance analysis on multiple computer-assisted (IVOS) sperm morphology readings. Andrologia 31:163-168.   DOI
24 Bonilla E, Xu EY (2008) Identification and characterization of novel mammalian spermatogenic genes conserved from fly to human. Mol Hum Reprod 14:137-142.   DOI
25 Brokaw CJ, Josslin R, Bobrow L (1974) Calcium ion regulation of flagellar beat symmetry in reactivated sea urchin spermatozoa. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 58:795-800.   DOI
26 Calhim S, Immler S, Birkhead TR (2007) Postcopulatory sexual selection is associated with reduced variation in sperm morphology. PLoS ONE 2(5):e413.   DOI
27 Cummins JM (1982) Sperm size, body mass, and reproduction in mammals. In: Andre J, editor. The Sperm Cell. The Hague, Martinus Nijholf, pp 395-398.
28 David I, Kohnke P, Lagriffoul G, Praud O, Plouarboue F, Degond P, Druart X (2015) Mass sperm motility is associated with fertility in sheep. Anim Reprod Sci 161:75-81.   DOI
29 Eisenbach M (1999) Sperm chemotaxis. Rev Reprod 4:56-66.   DOI
30 Farrel PB, Presicce GA, Brockett CC, Foote RH (1998) Quantification of bull sperm characteristics measured by computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) and the relationship to fertility. Theriogenology 49:871-879.   DOI
31 Feldmann J, Nelson RW (1996) Canine and feline endocrinology and reproduction. Edited by W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp. 718-733.
32 Fetterlof PM, Rogers BJ (1990) Prediction of human sperm penetrating ability using computerized motion parameters. Mol Reprod Dev 27:326-331.   DOI