Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12717/DR.2016.20.3.219

Long Cut Straw Provides Stable the Rates of Survival, Pregnancy and Live Birth for Vitrification of Human Blasotcysts  

Lee, Jung-Woo (Agaon Fertility Clinic)
Cha, Jeong-Ho (Agaon Fertility Clinic)
Shin, Sun-Hee (Agaon Fertility Clinic)
Kim, Yun-Jeong (Agaon Fertility Clinic)
Lee, Seul-Ki (Agaon Fertility Clinic)
Cha, Hye-Jin (Agaon Fertility Clinic)
Kim, Ji-Hae (Agaon Fertility Clinic)
Ahn, Ji-Hyun (Agaon Fertility Clinic)
Kim, Hye-Young (Agaon Fertility Clinic)
Pak, Kyung-Ah (Agaon Fertility Clinic)
Yoon, Ji-Sung (Agaon Fertility Clinic)
Park, Seo-Young (Agaon Fertility Clinic)
Park, Choon-keun (College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University)
Publication Information
Development and Reproduction / v.20, no.3, 2016 , pp. 219-225 More about this Journal
Abstract
Most of the commercial devices for vitrification are directly immersed into the warming solution (WS) for increasing of warming rate. However, the previous modified cut standard straw (MCS) which has reported is difficult to immerse into the WS. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the long cut straw (LCS) could be useful as a stable tool for vitrified-warmed human blastocysts. A total of 138 vitrified-warmed cycles were performed between November 2013 and November 2014 (exclusion criteria: women ${\geq}38$ years old, poor responder, surgical retrieval sperm, and severe male factor). The artificial shrinkage was conducted using 29-gauge needles. Ethylene glycol and dimethyl sulfoxide (7.5% and 15% (v/v)) were used as cryoprotectants. Freezing and warming were conducted using the LCS tool. The cap of LCS was removed using the forceps in the liquid nitrogen ($LN_2$) and then directly immersed into the first WS for 1 min at $37^{\circ}C$ (1 M sucrose). Only re-expanded blastocysts were transferred after it was cultured in sequential media for 18-20 h. A total of 294 blastocysts were warmed, and all were recovered (100%). Two hundred eighty-five embryos were survived (96.9%). The vitrified-warmed blastocysts of all patients were transferred without any cancellation. We were able to achieve a reasonable implantation (24.2%), following by clinical pregnancy (36.2%), which then continued to ongoing pregnancy (36.2%), and live birth (31.2%). Using LCS is achieved the acceptable rates of survival, pregnancy and live birth. Therefore, the LCS could be considered as a stable and simple tool for human embryo vitrificaton.
Keywords
Human blastocysts; Long cut straw; Vitrification; Survival; Clinical outcomes;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bielanski A, Bergeron H, Lau P, Devenish J (2003) Microbial contamination of embryos and semen during long term banking in liquid nitrogen. Cryobiology 46:146-152.   DOI
2 Bielanski A, Nadin-Davis S, Sapp T, Lutze-Wallace C (2000) Viral contamination of embryos cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen. Cryobiology 40:110-116.   DOI
3 Bielanski A, Vajta G (2009) Risk of contamination of germplasm during cryopreservation and cryobanking in IVF units. Hum Reprod 24:2457-2467.   DOI
4 Cobo A, Kuwayama M, Perez S, Ruiz A, Pellicer A, Remohi J (2008) Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop method. Fertil Steril 89:1657-1664.   DOI
5 De Munck N, Santos-Ribeiro S, Stoop D, Van de Velde H, Verheyen G (2016) Open versus closed oocyte vitrification in an oocyte donation programme: A prospective randomized sibling oocyte study. Hum Reprod 31:377-384.
6 Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB (2000) Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 73:1155-1158.   DOI
7 Gvakharia M, Adamson GD (2011) Implementation of an inexpensive method of vitrification and warming of human cleavage-stage embryos using cut standard straws. Fertil Steril 95:2552-2553.   DOI
8 Jung YJ, Cheon YP (2014) Improvement of the vitrification method suppressing the disturbance of meiotic spindle and chromosome systems in mature oocytes. Dev Reprod 18:117-125.   DOI
9 Kim HJ, Kim CH, Lee JY, Kwon JH, Hwang D, Kim KC (2010) Effect of cryopreservation day on pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer. Korean J Reprod Med 37:57-64.
10 Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Ieda S, Kato O (2005a) Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Reprod Biomed Online 11:608-614.   DOI
11 Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O, Leibo SP (2005b) Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 11:300-308.   DOI
12 Lim JG, Heo YT, Min, SG Min BY, Uhm SJ, Kim NH (2013) Clinical outcomes of vitrified-thawed embryo transfer using a pull and cut straw method. Obstet Gynecol Sci 56:182-189.   DOI
13 Loutradi KE, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Papanikolaou EG, Pados G, Bontis I, Tarlatzis BC (2008) Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 90:186-193.   DOI
14 Marco-Jimenez F, Jimenez-Trigos E, Almela-Miralles V, Vicente JS (2016) Development of cheaper embryo vitrifycation device using the minimum volume method. PLOS one 11:1-9.
15 Mukaida T, Oka C, Goto T, Takahashi K (2006) Artificial shrinkage of blastocoeles using either a micro-needle or a laser pulse prior to the cooling steps of vitrification improves survival rate and pregnancy outcome of vitrified human blastocysts. Hum Reprod 21:3246-3252.   DOI
16 Rall WF, Fahy GM (1985) Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at $-196^{\circ}C$ by vitrification. Nature 313:573-575.   DOI
17 Vajta G, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM (2015) Open versus closed systems for vitrification of human oocytes and embryos. Reprod Biomed Online 30:325-333.   DOI
18 Shin MR, Choi HW, Kim MK, Lee SH, Lee H, Lim CK (2011) In vitro development and gene expression of frozen-thawed 8-cell stage mouse embryos following slow freezing or vitrification. Clin Exp Reprod Med 38:203-209.   DOI
19 Vajta G, Kuwayama M. Improving cryopreservation systems (2006). Theriogenology 65:236-244.   DOI
20 Vajta G, Nagy ZP (2006) Are programmable freezers still needed in the embryo laboratory? Review on vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online 12:779-796.   DOI
21 Vanderzwalmen P, Zech N, Prapas Y, Panagiotidis Y, Papatheodorou A, Lejeune B, Jareno D, Vanderzwalmen S, Ectors F (2010) Closed carrier device: A reality to vitrify oocytes and embryos in aseptic conditions. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 38:541-546.   DOI
22 Youssry M, Ozmen B, Zohni K, Diedrich K, Al-Hasani S (2008) Current aspects of blastocyst cryopreservation. Reprod Biomed Online 16:311-320.   DOI