Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2020.14.3.203

The Alignment Evaluation for Patient Positioning System(PPS) of Gamma Knife PerfexionTM  

Jin, Seong Jin (Gamma Knife center, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University)
Kim, Gyeong Rip (Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital)
Hur, Beong Ik (Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Hospital)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology / v.14, no.3, 2020 , pp. 203-209 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to assess the mechanical stability and alignment of the patient positioning system (PPS) of Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion(LGK PFX). The alignment of the PPS of the LGK PFX was evaluated through measurements of the deviation of the coincidence of the Radiological Focus Point(RFP) and the PPS Calibration Center Point(CCP) applying different weights on the couch(0, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 kg). In measurements, a service diode test tool with three diode detectors being used biannually at the time of the routine preventive maintenance was used. The test conducted with varying weights on the PPS using the service diode test tool measured the radial deviations for all three collimators 4, 8, and 16 mm and also for three different positions of the PPS. In order to evaluate the alignment of the PPS, the radial deviations of the correspondence of the radiation focus and the LGK calibration center point of multiple beams were averaged using the calibrated service diode test tool at three university hospitals in Busan and Gyeongnam. Looking at the center diode for all collimators 4, 8, and 16 mm without weight on the PPS, and examining the short and long diodes for the 4 mm collimator, the means of the validation difference, i.e., the radial deviation for the setting of 4, 8, and 16 mm collimators for the center diode were respectively measured to 0.058 ± 0.023, 0.079 ± 0.023, and 0.097 ± 0.049 mm, and when the 4 mm collimator was applied to the center diode, the short diode, and the long diode, the average of the radial deviation was respectively 0.058 ± 0.023, 0.078 ± 0.01 and 0.070 ± 0.023 mm. The average of the radial deviations when irradiating 8 and 16 mm collimators on short and long diodes without weight are measured to 0.07 ± 0.003(8 mm sd), 0.153 ± 0.002 mm(16 mm sd) and 0.031 ± 0.014(8 mm ld), 0.175 ± 0.01 mm(16 mm ld) respectively. When various weights of 50 to 90 kg are placed on the PPS, the average of radial deviation when irradiated to the center diode for 4, 8, and 16 mm is 0.061 ± 0.041 to 0.075 ± 0.015, 0.023 ± 0.004 to 0.034 ± 0.003, and 0.158 ± 0.08 to 0.17 ± 0.043 mm, respectively. In addition, in the same situation, when the short diode for 4, 8, and 16 mm was irradiated, the averages of radial deviations were 0.063 ± 0.024 to 0.07 ± 0.017, 0.037 ± 0.006 to 0.059 ± 0.001, and 0.154 ± 0.03 to 0.165 ± 0.07 mm, respectively. In addition, when irradiated on long diode for 4, 8, and 16 mm, the averages of radial deviations were measured to be 0.102 ± 0.029 to 0.124 ± 0.036, 0.035 ± 0.004 to 0.054 ± 0.02, and 0.183 ± 0.092 to 0.202 ± 0.012 mm, respectively. It was confirmed that all the verification results performed were in accordance with the manufacturer's allowable deviation criteria. It was found that weight dependence was negligible as a result of measuring the alignment according to various weights placed on the PPS that mimics the actual treatment environment. In particular, no further adjustment or recalibration of the PPS was required during the verification. It has been confirmed that the verification test of the PPS according to various weights is suitable for normal Quality Assurance of LGK PFX.
Keywords
Gamma Knife $Perfexion^{TM}$; Patient Positioning System; Service Diode test tool; Radial Deviation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 C. Lindquist, I. Paddick, "The Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion and comparisons with its predecessors", Neurosurgery, Vol. 61, pp. 130-140, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000316276.20586.dd
2 J. Regis, M. Tamura, C. Guillot, S. Yomo, X. Muracciolle, M. Nagaje, Y. Arka, D. Porcheron, "Radiosurgery with the world's first fully robotized Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion in clinical use: A 200-patient prospective, randomized, controlled comparison with the Gamma Knife 4C", Neurosurgery, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 346-355, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000337578.00814.75   DOI
3 B. I. Hur, "Comparisons between the Two Dose Profiles Extracted from Leksell GammaPlan and Calculated by Variable Ellipsoid Modeling Technique", Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 9-17, 2017. https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2017.11.1.9   DOI
4 M. Zeverino, M. Jaccard, D. Patin, N. Ryckx, M. Marguet, C. Tuleasca, L. Schiappacasse, J. Bourhis, M. Levivier, F. O. Bochud, R. Moeckli, "Commissioning of the Leksell Gamma Knife Icon", Medical Physics, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 355-363, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12052   DOI
5 A. H. Maitz, A. Wu, L. D. Lunsford, J. C. Flickinger, D. Kondziolka, W. D. Bloomer, "Quality assurance for gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery", International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 1465-1471, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(95)00577-L   DOI
6 J. Novotny, J. P. Bhatnagar, A. Niranjan, M. A. Quader, M. S. Huq, G. Bednarz, J. C. Flickinger, D. Kondziolka, L. D. Lunsford, "Dosimetric comparison of the Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion and 4C", Journal of Neurosurgery, Vol. 109, No. 6, pp. 8-14, 2008. https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS/2008/109/12/S3   DOI
7 S. J. Jin, S. J. Kim, W. S. Seo, B. I. Hur, "Comparative Analysis of Treatment Planning System and Dose Distribution of Gamma knife PerfexionTM using EBT-3 Film", Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 509-515, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2017.11.6.509   DOI