Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2017.11.5.413

Analysis of Factors Related to Pain Relief on Modified Mammography  

Jang, Myung Mi (Department of Dignostic Radiology, Seoul National University Boramae hospital)
Kim, Hwa Sun (Department of Radiological Technology, Ansan University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology / v.11, no.5, 2017 , pp. 413-421 More about this Journal
Abstract
Mammography, the basic test for finding and treating increased breast cancer, gives the anxiety of cancer and radiation exposure to most women. In addition, it gave very severe compression pain, so we studied the degree of pain and tried to reduce the pain. The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the modified imaging technique and the basic imaging technique based on clinical experience, respectively. The subjects of this study were 160 women from 30 to 60 years old who visited to Seoul Boramae Hospital operated by Seoul National University Hospital from February to March 2017 for breast screening. Modified 80 persons and 80 persons were divided into two groups, and each group was asked to fill out questionnaires sequentially without knowing the subjects. The first method is a modified method in which an automatic pedal is divided into four or more presses, a manual pressure is used together, and an attitude is described in detail. Secondly, we used only the automatic pedal compression method and press it within 1-3 times. In the mean of the pain distribution, the experimental group (modified method) was 2.49 and the control group (basic method) had an average of 4.86, which showed 48.8% less pain. In this modified method, the pain scores of the experimental group were lower than those of the control group, and the degree of the pain was statistically significant.
Keywords
Breast cancer; Mammography; Compression pain;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 S. S. Kang, "Usefulness Evaluation of Mammographic Image," Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 49-54, 2004.
2 L. Arnold, "Patient Care, Communication, and Safety in the Mammography Suite," Radiologic Technology, Vol. 88, No, 1, pp. 33-47, 2016.
3 P. Mattsson, "Mammography-Related Breast Pain Is Associated with Migraine," Cephalalgia, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 616-23, 2009.   DOI
4 M. Dustler, I. Andersson, H. Brorson, P. Frojd, S. Mattsson, A. Tingberg, S. Zackrisson, D. Fornvik, "Breast Compression in Mammography: Pressure Distribution Patterns," Acta Radiologica, Vol. 53, No. 9, pp. 973-80, 2012.   DOI
5 F. D. G. Baldisserotto, S. Elias, I. D. C. G. Silva, A. C. P. Nazario, "The Relationship between Estrogen Receptor Gene Polymorphism and Mammographic Density in Postmenopausal Women," Climacteric, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 369-80, 2013.   DOI
6 N. Maloney, M. Koch, D. Erb, H. Schneider, T. Goffman, D. Elkins, C. Laronga, "Impact of Race on Breast Cancer in Lower Socioeconomic Status Women," The Breast Journal, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 58-62, 2006.   DOI
7 S. Malkov, J. A. Shepherd, C. G. Scott, R. M. Tamimi, L. Ma, K. A. Bertrand, F. Couch, M. R. Jensen, A. P. Mahmoudzadeh, B. Fan, A. Norman, K. R. Brandt K, V. S. Pankratz, C. M. Vachon, K. Kerlikowske. "Mammographic Texture and Risk of Breast Cancer by Tumor Type and Estrogen Receptor Status," Breast Cancer Research, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 1, 2017.   DOI
8 S. S. Ko, S. K. Kim, S. I. Kim, B. W. Park, K. S. Lee, "Body Mass Index as a Risk and Prognostic Factor of Breast Cancer," Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research, Vol. 63, No. 6, pp. 449-457, 2002.
9 R. K. Ross, A. Paganini-Hill, P. C. Wan, M. C. Pike, "Effect of Hormone Replacement Therapy on Breast Cancer Risk: Estrogen Versus Estrogen Plus Progestin," Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol.92, No. 4, pp. 328-32, 2000.   DOI
10 K. Kerlikowske, L. Ichikawa, D. L. Miglioretti, D. S. Buist, P. M. Vacek, R. Smith-Bindman, B. Yankaskas, P. A. Carney, R. Ballard-Barbash, "Longitudinal Measurement of Clinical Mammographic Breast Density to Improve Estimation of Breast Cancer Risk," Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 99,No. 5, pp. 386-95, 2007.   DOI