1 |
P otter R, Haie-Meder C, Van Limbergen E, et al.: Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (II): concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy-3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology. Radiother Oncol, 78(1), 67-77, 2006
DOI
|
2 |
Lin LL, Mutic S, Low DA, LaForest R, Vicic M, Zoberi I, et al.: Adaptive brachytherapy treatment planning for cervical cancer using FDG-PET. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 67(1), 91-96, 2007
DOI
|
3 |
Wachter-Gerstner N, Wachter S, Reinstadler E, et al.: Bladder and rectum dose defined from MRI based treatment planning for cervix cancer brachytherapy: comparison of dose-volume histograms for organ contours and organ wall, comparison with ICRU rectum and bladder reference point. Radiother Oncol, 68(3), 269-276, 2003
DOI
|
4 |
Pelloski CE, Palmer M, Chronowski GM, et al.: Comparison between CT-based volumetric calculations and ICRU reference-point estimates of radiation doses delivered to bladder and rectum durin IIIg intracavitary radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 62(1), 131-137, 2005
DOI
|
5 |
A namaria RY, Robert JA, Christoper GM, et al.: Long-term outcome after radiotherapy for FIGO stage IIIB and IVA carcinoma of the cervix, 67(5), 144-1450, 2007
DOI
|
6 |
A ndrzej R, Zaneta WF, Krystyna B, et al.: Incidence of radiation toxicity in cervical cancer and endometrial cancer patients treated with radiotherapy alone versus adjuvant radiotherapy, 17, 332-338, 2012
DOI
|
7 |
Barillot I, Horiot JC, Maingon P, et al.: Comparison of Computed Tomography and MRI-based clinical target volume vontours at the time of brachytherapy for cervical cancer, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys., 96(4), 793-800, 2016
DOI
|
8 |
T amaki T, Miyaura K, Murakami T, et al.: The use of trans-applicator intracavitary ultrasonography in brachytherapy for cervical cancer: phantom study of a novel approach to 3D image-guided brachytherapy, J Contemp Brachytherapy, 9(2), 151-157, 2017
|
9 |
W achter-Gerstner N, Wachter S, Reinstadler E, et al.: The impact of sectional imaging on dose escalation in endocavitary HDR-brachytherapy of cervical cancer: results of a prospective comparative trial. Radiother Oncol, 68(1), 51-59, 2003
DOI
|
10 |
S t-Amant P, Foster W, Froment MA, et al.: Use of 3D transabdominal ultrasound imaging for treatment planning in cervical cancer brachytherapy: Comparison to magnetic resonance and computed tomography, Brachytherapy, article in press, 2017
|
11 |
A lfredo P: Image fusion techniques in permanent seed implantation, J Contemp Brachytherapy, 2(3), 98-106, 2010
|
12 |
P elloski CE, Palmer M, Chronowski GM, et al.: Comparison between CT-based volumetric calculations and ICRU reference-point estimates of radiation doses delivered to bladder and rectum during intracavitary radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 62(1), 131-137, 2005
DOI
|
13 |
N atascha WG, Stefan W, Evi R, et al.: Bladder and Rectum dose defined from MRI based treatment planning for cervix cancer brachytherapy: comparison of does-volume histograms for organ contours and organ wall, comparison with ICRU rectum and bladder reference point, 68, 269-276, 2003
DOI
|
14 |
H aie-Meder C, Potter R, Van Limbergen E, et al.: Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV. Radiother Oncol, 74(3), 235-245, 2005
DOI
|