Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2017.40.2.11

Image Evaluation and Exposure Dose with the Application of Tube Voltage and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction of Low Dose Computed Tomography  

Moon, Tae-Joon (Dept. of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center)
Kim, Ki-Jeong (Dept. of Radiology, Wonkwang University Hospital)
Lee, Hye-Nam (Dept. of Radiology, Gimsangyeong Internal Medicine Clinic)
Publication Information
Journal of radiological science and technology / v.40, no.2, 2017 , pp. 261-267 More about this Journal
Abstract
The study has attempted to evaluate and compare the image evaluation and exposure dose by respectively applying filter back projection (FBP), the existing test method, and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) with different values of tube voltage during the low dose computed tomography (LDCT). With the image reconstruction method as basis, chest phantom was utilized with the FBP and ASIR set at 10%, 20% respectively, and the change of tube voltage (100 kVp, 120 kVp). For image evaluation, back ground noise, signal-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-noise ratio (CNR) were measured, and, for dose assessment, CTDIvol and DLP were measured respectively. In terms of image evaluation, there was significant difference in ascending aorta (AA) SNR and inpraspinatus muscle (IM) SNR with the different amount of tube voltage (p < 0.05). In terms of CTDIvol, the measured values with the same tube voltage of 120 kVp were 2.6 mGy with no-ASIR and 2.17 mGy with 20%-ASIR respectively, decreased by 0.43 mGy, and the values with 100 kVp were 1.61 mGy with no-ASIR and 1.34 mGy with 20%-ASIR, decreased by 0.27 mGy. In terms of DLP, the measured values with 120 kVp were $103.21mGy{\cdot}cm$ with no-ASIR and $85.94mGy{\cdot}cm$ with 20%-ASIR, decreased by $17.27mGy{\cdot}cm$ (about 16.7%), and the values with 100 kVp were $63.84mGy{\cdot}cm$ with no-ASIR and $53.25mGy{\cdot}cm$ with 20%-ASIR, a decrease by $10.62mGy{\cdot}cm$ (about 16.7%). At lower tube voltage, the rate of dose significantly decreased, but the negative effects on image evaluation was shown due to the increase of noise.
Keywords
Chest Phantom; Low dose CT; Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction; Voltage;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 World Cancer Report 2008, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2008
2 Q Li, F Li, K Suzuki, J Shiraishi: Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Thoracic CT, Semin Ultrasound CT MR, 26(5), 357-363, 2005   DOI
3 Lee YJ, Han JY: Current Trends in Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Lung Cancer, Korean Journal of Medicine, 80(5), 529-531, 2011
4 Lee CH, Goo M, Ye HJ: Radiation dose modulation techniques in the multi detector CT era: from basics to practice, Radio Graphics, 28(2), 1451-1459, 2008
5 Smith AB, Dillon WP, Lau BC: Radiation dose reduction strategy for CT protocols: successful implementation in neuro radiology section, Radiology, 247(2), 499-506, 2008   DOI
6 Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A: Innovations in CT Dose Reduction Strategy: Application of the Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm, AJR, 194, (1), 191-199, 2010   DOI
7 A. K. Hara, R. G. Paden, and A. C: Silva, Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT, feasibility study, AJR, 193(2,) 764-771, 2009   DOI
8 Heyer CM, Mohr PS, Lemburg SP, et al: Image quality and radiation exposure at pulmonary CT angiography with 100 or 120kVp protocol: Prospective raddomized study, Radiology, vol. 245, 577-583, 2007   DOI
9 Libby DM, Wu N, Lee IJ, Farooqi A, Smith JP, Pasmantier MW, et al. : CT screening for lung cancer: the value of short-term CT follow-up. J. Chest, Vol. 129, 1039-42, 2006   DOI
10 MacRedmond R, McVey G, Lee M, Costello RW, Kenny D, Foley C, et al.: Screening for lung cancer using low dose CT scanning: results of 2 year follow up, J. Thorax, Vol. 61, 54-56, 2006
11 Naidich DP, Marshall CH, Gribbin C, Arams RS, McCauley DI: Low-dose CT of the lungs: preliminary observations, Radiology, Vol. 175, 729-731, 1990   DOI
12 A. K. Hara, R. G. Paden, and A. C.: Silva, Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT, feasibility study, AJR, 193(2), 764-771, 2009   DOI
13 Diederich S, Wormanns D, Heindel W: Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT, European Journal of Radiology, Vol. 45, 2-7, 2003   DOI
14 Bach PB, Jett JR, Pastorino U, Tockman MS, Swensen SJ, Begg CB: Computed tomography screening and lung cancer outcomes, JAMA., Vol. 297, 953-961, 2007   DOI
15 J Anthony Seibert, Gray T barnes, Robert G Gould: Specification, Acceptance testing and quality control of diagnostic X-ray imaging equipment, Medical physics monograph, 20(1), 899-936, 1991
16 K. Sauer and C. bouman: A local update strategy for iterative reconstruction from projections, IEEE Trans, on Signal Processing, 41(2), 1993
17 Hara, AK, Paden, RG, Silva, AC: Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Reducing Body Radiation Dose at CT, feasibility study, AJR, 193(3), 764-771, 2009   DOI