1 |
Brenner David J., McCollough CH., Ortho Colin G.: It is time to retire the computed tomography dose index (CTDI) for CT quality assurance and dose optimization. For the proposition. Medical Physics, 33, 1189-1190, 2006
|
2 |
Boone JM.: The trouble with CTD100. Medical Physics, 34(4), 1364-1371, 2007
DOI
|
3 |
McCollough CH.: It is time to retire the computed tomography dose index (CTDI) for CT quality assurance and dose optimization. Against the proposition. Medical Physics, 33(5), 1190-1191, 2006
|
4 |
Dixon RL.: Restructuring CT dosimetry-a realistic strategy for the future Requiem for the pencil chamber. Medical Physics, 33(1), 3973-3976, 2006
DOI
|
5 |
Sarabjeet Singh, Mannudeep K. Kalra, James HT, Mahadevappa M.: Automatic Exposure Control in CT: Applications and Limitations. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 8, 446-449, 2011
DOI
|
6 |
Grant K, Schmidt B.: CARE kV: automated dose-optimized selection of x-ray tube voltage. Available at: http://www.medical.siemens.com/siemens/en_US/gg_ct_FBAs/files/Case_Studies/CarekV_White_Paper.pdf, 2012
|
7 |
Paul DD, Oliver Langner, Dipl Ing, Michael Lell, WA Kalender.: Effects of Adaptive Section Collimation on Patient Radiation Dose in Multisection Spiral CT. Radiology, 252(1), 140-147, 2009
DOI
|
8 |
Erin Ange, Nazanin Yaghmai, Cecilia Matilda Jude, et al.: Dose to Radiosensitive Organs During Routine Chest CT: Effects of Tube Current Modulation. American Journal of Roentgenology, 193(5), 1340-1345, 2009
DOI
|
9 |
David J. Brenner, Eric J. Hall.: Computed Tomography - An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2277-2284, 2007
|
10 |
Hsieh J.: Computed tomography: principles, design, artifacts, and recent advances. Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press, 2003
|
11 |
Shope TB, Gagne RM, Johnson GC.: A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography. Medical Physics, 8(4), 488-495, 1981
DOI
|
12 |
Platten D, Castellano I, Chapple C, et al.: Radiation dosimetry for wide-beam CT scanners: recommendations of a working party of the institute of physics and engineering in medicine.The British Journal of Radiology, 86(1027), 2013
|
13 |
Marilyn J., Bernhard S., David Bradley, et al.: Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape. Radiology, 233(2), 515-522, 2004
DOI
|
14 |
Zhou H, Boone JM.: Monte Carlo evaluation of CTD(infinity) in infinitely long cylinders of water, polyethylene and PMMA with diameters from 10 mm to 500 mm. Medical Physics, 35(6), 2424-2431, 2008
DOI
|
15 |
Chang-Lae Lee, Hee-Joung Kim, Yong Hyun Chung, et al.: GATE Simulations of CTDI for CT Dose. Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 54(4), 1702-1708, 2009
DOI
|
16 |
Nickoloff EL, Dutta AK, Lu ZF.: Influence of phantom diameter, kVp and scan mode upon computed tomography dose index. Medical Physics, 30(3), 395-402, 2003
DOI
|
17 |
S. Jan, G. Santin, D. Strul, et al.: GATE - Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 49(19), 4543-4561, 2004
DOI
|
18 |
Dowsett DJ, Kenny PA, Johnston R.E.: The Physics of Diagnostic Imaging (2nd ed.). London: Hodder Education. p. 430. ISBN 9781444113396, 2006
|
19 |
Michael F. McNitt-Gray: AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT Radiation Dose in CT1, RadioGraphics 22(6), 1541-1553, 2002
DOI
|
20 |
Meyer P, Buffard E, Mertz L, Kennel C, Constantinesco A, Siffert P.: Evaluation of the use of six diagnostic X-ray spectra computer codes. The British Journal of Radiology, 77(915), 224-30, 2004
DOI
|
21 |
Boone JM, Geraghty EM, Seibert JA, Wootton-Gorges SL.: Dose Reduction in Pediatric CT: A Rational Approach. Radiology, 228(2), 352-60, 2003
DOI
|