Browse > Article

Analysis of the Importance of Subjects to Improve the Educational Curriculum in the Radiological Science - Focused on Radiological Technologists -  

Kim, Jung-Hoon (Dept. of Radiological Science, College of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Pusan)
Ko, Seong-Jin (Dept. of Radiological Science, College of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Pusan)
Kang, Se-Sik (Dept. of Radiological Science, College of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Pusan)
Kim, Dong-Hyun (Dept. of Radiological Science, College of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Pusan)
Kim, Chang-Soo (Dept. of Radiological Science, College of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Pusan)
Publication Information
Journal of radiological science and technology / v.35, no.2, 2012 , pp. 125-132 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study a group of experts and clinical radiological technologists were surveyed to evaluate the clinical importance of current subjects in the radiological sciences. For the data collection and analysis, an open-ended questionnaire was distributed to the group of experts, and a multiple choice questionnaire was distributed to radiological technologists. Subjects were classified into 9 groups for analysis of the importance of subjects, and in regard to the questionnaire design for measurement of variables, departments and type of hospital were set up as independent variables, and the 9 groups of subjects were set up as dependent variables. As a result, clinical radiological technologists perceived Diagnostic Imaging Technology and practical courses, including general radiography, CT and MRI, as the most clinically necessary subjects, and the group of experts placed most weight on basic courses for the major. The result of this study suggests that the curriculum should be revised in a way that combines theory and practice in order to foster radiological technologists capable of adapting to the rapidly changing healthcare environment.
Keywords
radiological science education; educational curriculum; radiological technologists;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 교육법전편찬회, 2007년 개정판 교육법전 부록, (주)교학사, 2007
2 김남선: 지역사회개발학과와 지역개발학과 교과목 비교분석을 통한 지역사회개발학과 교과과정 개선방안, 지역사회개발연구원 : 22(2), 387-416, 1997
3 이은송: 전문대학 사회체육과 특성화에 따른 학과명 및 교과목 선호도 조사연구, 학국체육교육학회지, 7(2), 46-54, 2002
4 고성진, 김화곤, 강세식, 박병래, 김창수: 방사선학과대학원 교육과정에 대한 연구, 방사선기술과학, 29(4), 293-301, 2006
5 허준: 방사선사 교육의 새로운 흐름, 방사선기술과학, 27(4), 5-9, 2004
6 최종학, 이상석, 김영일, 권달관, 김흥태, 임한영: 방사선학과의 4년제 대학 교육과정에 대한 연구, 방사선기술과학, 18(2), 87-102, 1995
7 의료기사등에 관한 법률, 법률 제 7148호, 2004
8 Jannette Collins, MEd, Ella A. Kazerooni, Kay H. Vydareny, Caroline E. Blane, Mark A. Albanese, Carolyn E. Prucha: Journal Publications in Radiologic Education A Review of the Literature, 1987-1997, Acad Radiol, 8, 31-41, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
9 유광열, 김성수, 안성민: 원자력산업 중견전문인력 양성을 위한 전문대학 교육과정 개발, 방사선기술과학, 28(1), 33-44, 2005
10 유광열, 김현수: 대학 방사선학과 학생들의 임상실습에 대한 만족도 현황과 발전방향, 방사선기술과학, 29(4), 303-310, 2006
11 고성진, 강세식, 김정훈, 최석윤, 김창수: 방사선학과대학원 교육의 국내외 현황 및 분석, 한국콘텐츠학회, 10(7), 305-316, 2010
12 강세식, 김창수, 최석윤, 고성진, 김정훈: 방사선학과 교육과정 개선을 위한 교육과정 평가, 한국콘텐츠학회, 11(5), 242-251, 2011
13 정성무 외 8명 : 원격교육연수원의 솔루션기능분석, 한국교육학술정보원, 연구보고서 RR 2007-3, 2007
14 김자미, 김창수, 이원규: 해외 이러닝 품질관리 동향 조사 보고서, 한국콘텐츠학회, 10(7), 449-458, 2010
15 한국보건의료인국가시험원: 방사선사 직무분석, 2000
16 이윤희, 박재현: 교육과정 개선을 위한 방사선사 직무분석, 방사선기술과학, 34 (3), 221-229, 2011