Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2017.00493

Set-up errors in head and neck cancer treated with IMRT technique assessed by cone-beam computed tomography: a feasible protocol  

Delishaj, Durim (Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Santa Chiara)
Ursino, Stefano (Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Santa Chiara)
Pasqualetti, Francesco (Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Santa Chiara)
Matteucci, Fabrizio (Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Santa Chiara)
Cristaudo, Agostino (Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Santa Chiara)
Soatti, Carlo Pietro (Department of Radiation Oncology, "A. Manzoni" Hospital)
Barcellini, Amelia (Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori)
Paiar, Fabiola (Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Santa Chiara)
Publication Information
Radiation Oncology Journal / v.36, no.1, 2018 , pp. 54-62 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate set-up errors, suggest the adequate planning target volume (PTV) margin and image-guided radiotherapy frequency in head and neck (H&N) cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) assessed by kV cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: We analyzed 360 CBCTs in 60 patients with H&N cancer treated with IMRT. The target delineation was contoured according to ICRU62. PTVs were generated by adding a 3-5 mm margin in all directions to the respective clinical target volumes. The kV CBCT images were obtained at first three days of irradiation and weekly thereafter. The overall mean displacement, range, systematic (${\Sigma}$) and random (${\sigma}$) errors were calculated. Adequate PTV margins were calculated according to the van Herk formula ($2.5{\Sigma}+0.7r$). Results: The mean of set-up errors was less than 2 mm in any direction. The overall frequency of set-up displacements greater than 3 mm was 3.9% in medial-lateral (ML) direction, 8% in superior-inferior (SI) direction, and 15.5% in anterior-posterior (AP) direction. The range of translations shifts was 0-9 mm in ML direction, 0-5 mm in SI direction and 0-10 mm in AP direction, respectively. After systematic set-up errors correction, the adequate margin to overcome the problem of set-up errors was found to be less than 3 mm. Conclusion: Image-guided kV CBCT was effective for the evaluation of set-up accuracy in H&N cancer. The kV CBCT at first three fractions and followed-by weekly appears adequate for reducing significantly set-up errors in H&N cancer treated with IMRT technique. Finally, 3-5 mm PTV margins appear adequate and safe to overcome the problem of set-up errors.
Keywords
Head and neck cancer; Radiotherapy; Chemotherapy; Cone-beam computed tomography; IMRT technique; Oncology;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Houghton F, Benson RJ, Tudor GS, et al. An assessment of action levels in imaging strategies in head and neck cancer using TomoTherapy. Are our margins adequate in the absence of image guidance? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2009;21:720-7.   DOI
2 Dionisi F, Palazzi MF, Bracco F, et al. Set-up errors and planning target volume margins in head and neck cancer radiotherapy: a clinical study of image guidance with on-line cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Clin Oncol 2013;18:418-27.   DOI
3 Bissonnette JP, Moseley D, White E, Sharpe M, Purdie T, Jaffray DA. Quality assurance for the geometric accuracy of conebeam CT guidance in radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;71(1 Suppl):S57-61.   DOI
4 McKenzie A, van Herk M, Mijnheer B. Margins for geometric uncertainty around organs at risk in radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2002;62:299-307.   DOI
5 Pisani L, Lockman D, Jaffray D, Yan D, Martinez A, Wong J. Setup error in radiotherapy: on-line correction using electronic kilovoltage and megavoltage radiographs. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;47:825-39.   DOI
6 Wang J, Bai S, Chen N, et al. The clinical feasibility and effect of online cone beam computer tomography-guided intensitymodulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2009;90:221-7.   DOI
7 Johansen J, Bertelsen A, Hansen CR, Westberg J, Hansen O, Brink C. Set-up errors in patients undergoing image guided radiation treatment. Relationship to body mass index and weight loss. Acta Oncol 2008;47:1454-8.   DOI
8 Barker JL Jr, Garden AS, Ang KK, et al. Quantification of volumetric and geometric changes occurring during fractionated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer using an integrated CT/linear accelerator system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;59:960-70.   DOI
9 Xu F, Wang J, Bai S, et al. Detection of intrafractional tumour position error in radiotherapy utilizing cone beam computed tomography. Radiother Oncol 2008;89:311-9.   DOI
10 Velec M, Waldron JN, O'Sullivan B, et al. Cone-beam CT assessment of interfraction and intrafraction setup error of two head-and-neck cancer thermoplastic masks. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;76:949-55.   DOI
11 Zhang L, Garden AS, Lo J, et al. Multiple regions-of-interest analysis of setup uncertainties for head-and-neck cancer radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;64:1559-69.   DOI
12 Clarizio M, Zani M, Delishaj D, et al. EP-1619: Comparison between two different commercial thermoplastic mask systems in image-guided radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol 2015;115:S887-S888.   DOI
13 Osman SO, de Boer HC, Astreinidou E, Gangsaas A, Heijmen BJ, Levendag PC. On-line cone beam CT image guidance for vocal cord tumor targeting. Radiother Oncol 2009;93:8-13.   DOI
14 van Kranen S, van Beek S, Rasch C, van Herk M, Sonke JJ. Setup uncertainties of anatomical sub-regions in head-andneck cancer patients after offline CBCT guidance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;73:1566-73.   DOI
15 Pasqualetti F, Bocci G, Mey V, et al. Akt1 rs2498801 is related to survival in head and neck squamous cell cancer treated with radiotherapy. Anticancer Res 2015;35:269-71.
16 Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65:5-29.   DOI
17 Marur S, Forastiere AA. Head and neck cancer: changing epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc 2008;83:489-501.   DOI
18 Stambuk HE, Karimi S, Lee N, Patel SG. Oral cavity and oropharynx tumors. Radiol Clin North Am 2007;45:1-20.   DOI
19 National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: head and neck cancer version II.2017 [Internet]. Fort Washington, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; c2018 [cited 2018 Mar 1]. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx.
20 Merlotti A, Alterio D, Vigna-Taglianti R, et al. Technical guidelines for head and neck cancer IMRT on behalf of the Italian association of radiation oncology: head and neck working group. Radiat Oncol 2014;9:264.   DOI
21 Bucci MK, Bevan A, Roach M 3rd. Advances in radiation therapy: conventional to 3D, to IMRT, to 4D, and beyond. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:117-34.   DOI
22 Forastiere AA, Zhang Q, Weber RS, et al. Long-term results of RTOG 91-11: a comparison of three nonsurgical treatment strategies to preserve the larynx in patients with locally advanced larynx cancer. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:845-52.   DOI
23 Lee N, Xia P, Fischbein NJ, Akazawa P, Akazawa C, Quivey JM. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head-andneck cancer: the UCSF experience focusing on target volume delineation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;57:49-60.   DOI
24 Ursino S, Faggioni L, Guidoccio F, et al. Role of perfusion CT in the evaluation of functional primary tumour response after radiochemotherapy in head and neck cancer: preliminary findings. Br J Radiol 2016;89:20151070.   DOI
25 Chao KS, Ozyigit G, Tran BN, Cengiz M, Dempsey JF, Low DA. Patterns of failure in patients receiving definitive and postoperative IMRT for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;55:312-21.   DOI
26 Parliament MB, Scrimger RA, Anderson SG, et al. Preservation of oral health-related quality of life and salivary flow rates after inverse-planned intensity- modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;58:663-73.   DOI
27 Ursino S, D'Angelo E, Mazzola R, et al. A comparison of swallowing dysfunction after three-dimensional conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a systematic review by the Italian Head and Neck Radiotherapy Study Group. Strahlenther Onkol 2017;193:877-89.   DOI
28 Eisbruch A, Kim HM, Terrell JE, Marsh LH, Dawson LA, Ship JA. Xerostomia and its predictors following parotid-sparing irradiation of head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;50:695-704.   DOI
29 Chao KS, Deasy JO, Markman J, et al. A prospective study of salivary function sparing in patients with head-and-neck cancers receiving intensity-modulated or three-dimensional radiation therapy: initial results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;49:907-16.   DOI
30 Delishaj D, Ursino S, Lombardo E, et al. Impact of treatment volumes in loco-regional failure of oral cancer in patients treated with IMRT. Radiother Oncol 2016;119:S985.
31 Jaffray DA, Siewerdsen JH, Wong JW, Martinez AA. Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002;53:1337-49.   DOI
32 Nielsen M, Bertelsen A, Westberg J, Jensen HR, Brink C. Cone beam CT evaluation of patient set-up accuracy as a QA tool. Acta Oncol 2009;48:271-6.   DOI
33 Den RB, Doemer A, Kubicek G, et al. Daily image guidance with cone-beam computed tomography for head-and-neck cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a prospective study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;76:1353-9.   DOI
34 Bortfeld T, van Herk M, Jiang SB. When should systematic patient positioning errors in radiotherapy be corrected? Phys Med Biol 2002;47:N297-302.   DOI
35 Korreman S, Rasch C, McNair H, et al. The European Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology-European Institute of Radiotherapy (ESTRO-EIR) report on 3D CT-based in-room image guidance systems: a practical and technical review and guide. Radiother Oncol 2010;94:129-44.   DOI
36 Stroom JC, Heijmen BJ. Geometrical uncertainties, radiotherapy planning margins, and the ICRU-62 report. Radiother Oncol 2002;64:75-83.   DOI
37 van Herk M. Errors and margins in radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2004;14:52-64.   DOI
38 Amer AM, Mackay RI, Roberts SA, Hendry JH, Williams PC. The required number of treatment imaging days for an effective off-line correction of systematic errors in conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer: a radiobiological analysis. Radiother Oncol 2001;61:143-50.   DOI
39 Delishaj D, Ursino S, Lombardo E, et al. OC-0274: Analysis of set-up errors in head and neck cancer treated with IMRT technique assessed by CBCT. Radiother Oncol 2016;119(Suppl 1):S127-S128.
40 Zeidan OA, Langen KM, Meeks SL, et al. Evaluation of imageguidance protocols in the treatment of head and neck cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;67:670-7.   DOI
41 Suzuki M, Nishimura Y, Nakamatsu K, et al. Analysis of interfractional set-up errors and intrafractional organ motions during IMRT for head and neck tumors to define an appropriate planning target volume (PTV)- and planning organs at risk volume (PRV)-margins. Radiother Oncol 2006;78:283-90.   DOI
42 Su J, Chen W, Yang H, et al. Different setup errors assessed by weekly cone-beam computed tomography on different registration in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Onco Targets Ther 2015;8:2545-53.