Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2012.30.1.36

Radial displacement of clinical target volume in node negative head and neck cancer  

Jeon, Wan (Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Wu, Hong-Gyun (Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Song, Sang-Hyuk (Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Kim, Jung-In (Department of Radiation Oncology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital)
Publication Information
Radiation Oncology Journal / v.30, no.1, 2012 , pp. 36-42 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the radial displacement of clinical target volume in the patients with node negative head and neck (H&N) cancer and to quantify the relative positional changes compared to that of normal healthy volunteers. Materials and Methods: Three node-negative H&N cancer patients and five healthy volunteers were enrolled in this study. For setup accuracy, neck thermoplastic masks and laser alignment were used in each of the acquired computed tomography (CT) images. Both groups had total three sequential CT images in every two weeks. The lymph node (LN) level of the neck was delineated based on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) consensus guideline by one physician. We use the second cervical vertebra body as a reference point to match each CT image set. Each of the sequential CT images and delineated neck LN levels were fused with the primary image, then maximal radial displacement was measured at 1.5 cm intervals from skull base (SB) to caudal margin of LN level V, and the volume differences at each node level were quantified. Results: The mean radial displacements were 2.26 (${\pm}1.03$) mm in the control group and 3.05 (${\pm}1.97$) in the H&N cancer patients. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the mean radial displacement (p = 0.03). In addition, the mean radial displacement increased with the distance from SB. As for the mean volume differences, there was no statistical significance between the two groups. Conclusion: This study suggests that a more generous radial margin should be applied to the lower part of the neck LN for better clinical target coverage and dose delivery.
Keywords
Head and neck neoplasms; Radiotherapy; Image-guided; Lymph nodes;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ferlito A, Rinaldo A, Devaney KO, et al. Prognostic signifi cance of microscopic and macroscopic extracapsular spread from metastatic tumor in the cervical lymph nodes. Oral Oncol 2002;38:747-51.   DOI
2 Magnano M, De Stefani A, Lerda W, et al. Prognostic factors of cervical lymph node metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Tumori 1997;83:922-6.
3 Mamelle G, Pampurik J, Luboinski B, Lancar R, Lusinchi A, Bosq J. Lymph node prognostic factors in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Am J Surg 1994;168:494-8.   DOI
4 Stringer SP. Current concepts in surgical management of neck metastases from head and neck cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 1995;9:547-54.
5 Gregoire V, Levendag P, Ang KK, et al. CT-based delineation of lymph node levels and related CTVs in the node-negative neck: DAHANCA, EORTC, GORTEC, NCIC, RTOG consensus guidelines. Radiother Oncol 2003;69:227-36.   DOI
6 van Asselen B, Raaijmakers CP, Lagendijk JJ, Terhaard CH. Intrafraction motions of the larynx during radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;56:384-90.   DOI
7 Linthout N, Verellen D, Tournel K, Storme G. Six dimensional analysis with daily stereoscopic x-ray imaging of intrafraction patient motion in head and neck treatments using five points fixation masks. Med Phys 2006;33:504-13.   DOI
8 Zhang L, Garden AS, Lo J, et al. Multiple regions-of-interest analysis of setup uncertainties for head-and-neck cancer radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;64:1559-69.   DOI
9 Gilbeau L, Octave-Prignot M, Loncol T, Renard L, Scalliet P, Gregoire V. Comparison of setup accuracy of three different thermoplastic masks for the treatment of brain and head and neck tumors. Radiother Oncol 2001;58:155-62.   DOI
10 de Boer HC, van Sornsen de Koste JR, Creutzberg CL, Visser AG, Levendag PC, Heijmen BJ. Electronic portal image assisted reduction of systematic set-up errors in head and neck irradiation. Radiother Oncol 2001;61:299-308.   DOI
11 Boda-Heggemann J, Walter C, Rahn A, et al. Repositioning accuracy of two different mask systems-3D revisited: comparison using true 3D/3D matching with cone-beam CT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;66:1568-75.   DOI
12 van Kranen S, van Beek S, Rasch C, van Herk M, Sonke JJ. Setup uncertainties of anatomical sub-regions in head-andneck cancer patients after offline CBCT guidance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;73:1566-73.   DOI
13 Pehlivan B, Pichenot C, Castaing M, et al. Interfractional setup errors evaluation by daily electronic portal imaging of IMRT in head and neck cancer patients. Acta Oncol 2009;48:440-5.   DOI
14 National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Recent application of the NCRP public dose limit recommendation for ionizing radiation. Bethesda: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; 2004. NCRP statement no. 10.
15 Barker JL Jr, Garden AS, Ang KK, et al. Quantification of volumetric and geometric changes occurring during fractionated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer using an integrated CT/linear accelerator system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;59:960-70.   DOI
16 McBain CA, Henry AM, Sykes J, et al. X-ray volumetric imaging in image-guided radiotherapy: the new standard in ontreatment imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;64:625-34.   DOI