Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/jkstro.2010.28.1.50

External Auditing on Absorbed Dose Using a Solid Water Phantom for Domestic Radiotherapy Facilities  

Choi, Chang-Heon (Department of Radiation Applying Life Science, Seoul National University Graduate School)
Kim, Jung-In (Department of Radiation Applying Life Science, Seoul National University Graduate School)
Park, Jong-Min (Department of Radiation Applying Life Science, Seoul National University Graduate School)
Park, Yang-Kyun (Department of Radiation Applying Life Science, Seoul National University Graduate School)
Cho, Kun-Woo (Radiation Research, Korean Institute of Nuclear Safety)
Cho, Woon-Kap (Radiation Research, Korean Institute of Nuclear Safety)
Lim, Chun-Il (Korea Food and Drug Administration)
Ye, Sung-Joon (Department of Radiation Applying Life Science, Seoul National University Graduate School)
Publication Information
Radiation Oncology Journal / v.28, no.1, 2010 , pp. 50-56 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: We report the results of an external audit on the absorbed dose of radiotherapy beams independently performed by third parties. For this effort, we developed a method to measure the absorbed dose to water in an easy and convenient setup of solid water phantom. Materials and Methods: In 2008, 12 radiotherapy centers voluntarily participated in the external auditing program and 47 beams of X-ray and electron were independently calibrated by the third party’s American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) task group (TG)-51 protocol. Even though the AAPM TG-51 protocol recommended the use of water, water as a phantom has a few disadvantages, especially in a busy clinic. Instead, we used solid water phantom due to its reproducibility and convenience in terms of setup and transport. Dose conversion factors between solid water and water were determined for photon and electron beams of various energies by using a scaling method and experimental measurements. Results: Most of the beams (74%) were within ${\pm}2%$ of the deviation from the third party's protocol. However, two of 20 X-ray beams and three of 27 electron beams were out of the tolerance (${\pm}3%$), including two beams with a >10% deviation. X-ray beams of higher than 6 MV had no conversion factors, while a 6 MV absorbed dose to a solid water phantom was 0.4% less than the dose to water. The electron dose conversion factors between the solid water phantom and water were determined: The higher the electron energy, the less is the conversion factor. The total uncertainty of the TG-51 protocol measurement using a solid water phantom was determined to be ${\pm}1.5%$. Conclusion: The developed method was successfully applied for the external auditing program, which could be evolved into a credential program of multi-institutional clinical trials. This dosimetry saved time for measuring doses as well as decreased the uncertainty of measurement possibly resulting from the reference setup in water.
Keywords
Quality assurance; External auditing; Solid water phantom; Dosimetry;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Almond PR, Biggs PJ, Coursey BM, et al. AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Med Phys 1999;26:1847-1870   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Seuntjens J, Olivares M, Evans M, Podgorsak E. Absorbed dose to water reference dosimetry using solid phantoms in the context of absorbed-dose protocols. Med Phys 2005;32:2945-2953   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Pruitt JS, Loevinger R. The photon-fluence scaling theorem for Compton-scattered radiation. Med Phys 1982;9:176-179   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Klein EE, Hanley J, Bayouth J, et al. Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators. Med Phys 2009;36:4197-4212   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Kutcher GJ, Coia L, Gillin M, et al. Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40. Med Phys 1994;21:581-618
6 Matsufuji N, Tomura H, Futami Y, et al. Relationship between CT number and electron density, scatter angle and nuclear reaction for hadron-therapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 1998;43:3261-3275   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Barendsen GW. Dose fractionation, dose rate and iso-effect relationships for normal tissue responses. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1982;8:1981-1997   DOI   ScienceOn