Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/jkstro.2009.27.1.10

Results of Radiation Therapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus  

Chun, Ha-Chung (Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Hanyang University College of Medicine)
Lee, Myung-Za (Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Hanyang University College of Medicine)
Publication Information
Radiation Oncology Journal / v.27, no.1, 2009 , pp. 10-14 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and prognostic factors for patients treated with postoperative radiation therapy following surgery or with radiation therapy alone for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 132 esophageal cancer patients treated with postoperative radiation therapy following surgery or patients who were treated with radiation therapy alone at our institution from 1989 to 2006. Thirty-five patients had stage II disease, 88 patients had stage III disease and nine patients had stage IV disease. Tumors were located at the upper esophagus in 18 patients, the mid esophagus in 81 patients and the distal esophagus in 33 patients. Sixty patients were treated with radiation therapy alone and 72 patients were treated with postoperative radiation therapy following surgery. Eight patients received a dose less than 40 Gy and 78 patients received a dose of 40 to 50 Gy. The remaining 46 patients received a dose of 50 to 60 Gy. The majority of patients who underwent postoperative radiation therapy received a dose of 45 Gy. Results: Actuarial survival rates for all of the patients at two years and five years were 24% and 5%, respectively. The median survival time was 11 months. Survival rates for patients who underwent postoperative RT at two years and five years were 29% and 8%, respectively. The corresponding survival rates for patients who received radiation alone were 18% and 2%, respectively. Survival rates at two years and five years were 43% and 15% for stage II disease, 22% and 2% for stage III disease and 0% and 0% for stage IV disease, respectively; these findings were statistically significant. Two-year survival rates for patients with upper, middle and distal esophageal cancer were 19, 29% and 22%, respectively. Although there was a trend of slightly better survival for middle esophageal tumors, this finding was not statistically significant. Complete response to radiation was achieved in 13 patients (22%) and partial response to radiation was achieved in 40 patients (67%) who received radiation alone. No response to radiation was noted in seven patients (12%). A statistically significant difference in survival rates was seen between patients that had a complete response and patients that had a partial response. Two-year survival rates for patients that had a complete response versus patients that had a partial response were 31% and 17%, respectively. There were no survivors for patients with no response as determined at two-year follow-up. Conclusion: We conclude that radiation therapy is an effective treatment for esophageal cancer. Stage and response to radiation therapy were noted to be prognostic factors. A more effective treatment modality is needed to improve long term survival because of the relatively dismal prognosis for this tumor.
Keywords
Esophageal cancer; Radiation therapy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Muller JM, Erasmi H, Stelzner M, Zieren U, Pichelmaier H. Surgical therapy of esophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1990;77:845-857   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Drucker MH, Mansour KA, Hatcher CR, et al. Esophageal carcinoma, an aggressive approach. Ann Thorac Surg 1979;28:133-138   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
3 Sykes AJ, Burt PA, Slevin NJ, Stout R, Marrs JE. Radical radiotherapy for carcinoma of the esophagus: an effective alternative to surgery. Radiother Oncol 1998;48:15-21   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Stahl M, Stuschke M, Lehmann N, et al. Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2310-2317   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Demeester TR, Barlow AP. Surgery and current management for cancer of the esophagus and cardia. Curr Probl Cancer 1988;12:241-247
6 Okawa T, Kita M, Tanaka M, et al. Result of radiotherapy for inoperable locally advanced esophageal cancer. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 1989;17:49-54   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Earlam R, Cunhamelo JR. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a critical review of radiotherapy. Br J Surg 1980;67:457-461   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Goodner J. Surgical and radiation treatment of cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Am J Roentgenol 1969;105:523-528   DOI
9 Wu HK, Park SW, Park CI. Long term follow up after radiation therapy alone for esophageal carcinoma. J Korean Soc Ther Radiat Oncol 1998;16:441-446
10 Earlam R, Johnson L. 101 Esophageal cancer: a surgeon uses radiotherapy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1990;72:32-40   PUBMED
11 Pearson JG. The value of radiotherapy in the management of squamous esophageal cancer. Br J Surg 1971;58:794-798   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Harrison L, Fohel T, Picone J, et al. Radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Surg Oncol 1988;37:40-43   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Ahn SJ, Chung WK, Nah BS, Nam TK. External beam radiotherapy alone in advanced esophageal cancer. J Korean Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 2000;18:11-16
14 Hancock SL, Glatstein E. The radiotherapy result of esophageal cancer. Semin Oncol 1984;11:144-158   PUBMED
15 Nishimura Y, One K, Imamura M, et al. Postoperative radiation therapy for esophageal cancer. Radiat Med 1989;77:88-94
16 Graham AJ, Shrive FM, Ghali WA, et al. Defining the optimal treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer: a systemic review and decision analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:1257-1264   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Petrovich Z, Langholz B, Formenti S, et al. Management of carcinoma of the esophagus: the role of radiotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol 1991;14:80-86   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Rades D, Lang S, Schild SE, Alberti E. Prognostic value of haemoglobin levels during concurrent radiochemotherapy in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Clin Oncol 2006;18:139-144   DOI   ScienceOn