Browse > Article

Impact of Computed Tomography Slice Thickness on Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Plan  

Lee, Seoung-Jun (Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyungpook National University Hospital,)
Kim, Jae-Chul (Kyungpook National University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Radiation Oncology Journal / v.24, no.4, 2006 , pp. 285-293 More about this Journal
Abstract
$\underline{Purpose}$: This study was to search the optimal slice thickness of computed tomography (CT) in an intensity modulated radiation therapy plan through changing the slice thickness and comparing the change of the calculated absorbed dose with measured absorbed dose. $\underline{Materials\;and\;Methods}$: An intensity modulated radiation therapy plan for a head and neck cancer patient was done, first of all. Then CT with various ranges of slice thickness ($0.125{\sim}1.0\;cm$) for a head and neck anthropomorphic phantom was done and the images were reconstructed. The plan parameters obtained from the plan of the head and neck cancer patient was applied into the reconstructed images of the phantom and then absorbed doses were calculated. Films were inserted into the phantom, and irradiated with 6 MV X-ray with the same beam data obtained from the head and neck cancer patient. Films were then scanned and isodoses were measured with the use of film measurement software and were compared with the calculated isodeses. $\underline{Results}$: As the slice thickness of CT decreased, the volume of the phantom and the maximum absorbed dose increased. As the slice thickness of CT changed from 0.125 to 1.0 cm, the maximum absorbed dose changed ${\sim}5%$. The difference between the measured and calculated volume of the phantom was small ($3.7{\sim}3.8%$) when the slice thickness of CT was 0.25 cm or less. The difference between the measured and calculated dose was small ($0.35{\sim}1.40%$) when the slice thickness of CT was 0.25 cm or less. $\underline{Conclusion}$: Because the difference between the measured and calculated dose in a head and neck phantom was small and the difference between the measured and calculated volume was small when the slice thickness of CT was 0.25 cm or less, we suggest that the slice thickness of CT should be 0.25 cm or less for an optimal intensity modulated radiation therapy plan.
Keywords
Computed tomography; Slice thickness; Intensity modulated radiation therapy;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Dogan N, Leybovich LB, Sethi A. Comparative evaluation of Kodak EDR2 and XV2 films for verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2002;47:4121-4130   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Ma L, Geis PB, Boyer AL. Quality assurance for dynamic multileaf collimator modulated fields using a fast beam imaging system. Med Phys 1997;24:1213-1220   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Kang SK, Cho BC, Park HC, Bae HS. The effect of the CT voltages on the dose calculated by a commercial RTP system. J Korea Med Phys 2004;15:23-29
4 Mundt AJ, Roeske JC. Intensity modulated radiation therapy- a clinical perspective. Hamilton and London; BC Decker Inc, 2005:83-89
5 MacKenzie MA, Lachaine M, Murray B, Fallone BG, Robinson D, Field GC. Dosimetric verification of inverse planned step and shoot mulitileaf collimator fields from a commercial treatment planning system. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2002;3:97-109   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Agazaryan N, Solberg TD, Demarco JJ. Patient specific quality assurance for the delivery of intensity modulated radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2003;4:40-49   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Martin JM. The importance of computed tomography slice thickness in radiographic patient positioning for radiosurgery. Med Phys 1999;26:171-175   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Budgell GJ, Perrin BA, Mott JH, Fairfoul J, Mackay RI. Quantitative analysis of patient-specific dosimetric IMRT verification. Phys Med Biol 2005;50:103-119   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Xing L, Li JG. Computer verification of fluence map for intensity modulated radiation therapy. Med Phys 2000;27: 2084-2092   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Tsai JS, Wazer DE, Ling MN, et al. Dosimetric verification of the dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy of 92 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998;40:1213-1230   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Berthelet E, Liu M, Truong P, et al. CT slice index and thickness: Impact on organ contouring in radiation treatment planning for prostate cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2003; 4:365-373   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Papatheodorou S, Rosenwald JC, Zefkili S, Murillo MC, Drouard J, Gaboriaud G. Dose calculation and verification of intensity modulation generated by dynamic multileaf collimators. Med Phys 2000;27:960-971   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Shin KH, Park SY, Park DH, et al. Patient specific quality assurance of IMRT: quantitative approach using film dosimetry and optimization. J Korean Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 2005;23; 176-185   과학기술학회마을
14 James MG, Gary E, Avraham E, et al. Implementing IMRT in clinical practice: a joint document of the American society for therapeutic radiology and oncology and the American association of physicists in medicine. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;58:1616-1634   DOI   ScienceOn