Browse > Article

A Study of the Aesthetics of Mimesis in 2000s Fashion  

Yang, Su-Mi (Dept. of Clothing & Textile, Pusan National University)
Kwon, Mi-Jeong (Dept. of Clothing & Textile, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Costume / v.59, no.10, 2009 , pp. 38-50 More about this Journal
Abstract
Since Homeros in Greece, Mimesis was thought to be an art to imitate the nature, and it means an imitation of the nature classically. Mimetic theories were set to be a kind of art work in the era of Renaissance, and the terminology of mimesis was widely used to replace it with an originality in the 15th century. The purpose of this study is to understand the aesthetics of mimesis expressed in 2000s fashion. For this purpose, I investigated the theories of the mimesis, categorized the definition, then applied those categories for 2000s fashion. Documentary studies were conducted through aesthetics, fashion books and demonstrative studies were processed by analyzing photos from collection fashion magazines and fashion site of internet. In the history of aesthetics, the mimesis could be defined into three categories; the similarity and the representation mimesis, the symbol mimesis and the abstraction mimesis. In fashion, the representation mimesis included a natural and a folk, a period that of 1900s and ancient representation mimesis. The symbol mimesis included psychology and fear symbol mimesis. The abstraction mimesis included hard color, a geometric simplification and distortion mimesis. Analysis on the mimesis expressed in 2000s modern fashion may provide an excellent method for understanding human aesthetic in costume.
Keywords
mimesis; representation mimesis; symbol mimesis; abstraction mimesis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 W. Tatarukiewicz(1980). A history of six ideas
2 손 효주 역(1990). 미학의 기본 개념사. 미진사, p. 311
3 손 효주 역(1990). 미학의 기본 개념사. 미진사, p. 314-315
4 G. Luk$\acute{a}$cs (1963). Die Eigenart des $\ddot{A}$sthetischen I. Werke, Bd.11, Luchterhand, pp. 352-353
5 이현경 역(2005). 미의 역사. 열린 책들, p. 346
6 이길우, 이선관, 임호일, 한동원 역(1996). 진리와 방법. 문학동네, p. 171
7 Charles-Pierre Bru (1955). Esth$\acute{e}$tique de L'abstraction. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, p. 300
8 Stephen Bann (1980). 'Abstract art - a language?' in Toward a new Art: essays on the background to abstract art 1910-1920. The Galley, London. pp. 130-133
9 Collection. 2003-2004 S/S Paris and Milano, 동아 TV, p. 44
10 Collection. 2004-2005 F/W Paris and Milano. 동아TV, p. 50
11 STYLE.COM. 2009 F/W Alexander McQueen, 자료검색일 2009.8.25, 자료출처 www.style.com
12 Werner Jung (1995). Von der Mimesis zur Simulation
13 T. W. Adorno (1970). $\ddot{A}$sthetische Theorie. Suhrkamp, Frankfrut/M, Bd.7, p. 169
14 Marilyn J. Horn, Lois M. Gurel (1981). The Second Skin
15 진성모 (2003). 현대복식에 표현된 변형에 관한 연구. 국민대 논총, p. 534
16 G. Luk$\acute{a}$cs (1963). Die Eigenart des $\ddot{A}$sthetischenII. Werke Bd.12, Luchterhand, p. 356
17 장희창 역(2006). 미메시스에서 시뮬라시옹까지. 경성대학교출판부. pp. 15-99
18 Stephen Bann (1980). 'Abstract art - a language?' in Toward a new Art: essays on the background to abstract art 1910-1920. The Galley, London p. 139
19 이주영 (1998). 추상미술과 미메시스. 한국미학예술학연구, 8, p. 102
20 김희숙 (2005). 꽃의 이미지를 활용한 패션조형 연구 : 미메시스 개념을 중심으로. 홍익대학교 대학원 석사학위논문, pp. 22-97
21 STYLE.COM. 2008 F/W Gareth Pugh, 자료검색일 2009.8.15, 자료출처 www.style.com
22 자료검색일 2009.7.1, 자료출처http://blog.naver.com/mirva/15
23 Durix, Jean-Pierre(1998). Mimesis, Genres and Post-Colonial Discourse: Deconstructing Magic Realism. New York: Macmillian, p. 45
24 Hans Georg Gadamer(1900). Wahrheit und Methode
25 Aristoteles (1947). Poetica, R. Mckeon, Introduction to Aridtotle. New York: Random House, p. 627
26 이화연, 민동원, 손미영 역 (1995). 의복: 제2의 피부. 도서출판 까치, p. 199
27 이주영 (1998). 루카치의 미술관: 회화에 있어서의 리얼리즘. 문예미학, 4, p. 203
28 Collection, 2004-2005 S/S Paris and Milano, 동아 TV, pp. 23, 49, 103
29 STYLE.COM. 2009 S/S Junya Watanabe, 자료검색일 2009.8.9, 자료출처 www.style.com
30 Duncan, Alastair (1994). Art Nouveau. World of Art. New York: Thames and Hudson, pp. 7-36
31 진중권 (2009). 미학오디세이I. 휴머니스트, p. 126
32 Umberto, Eco (2004). Storia della Bellezza
33 Collection. 2004-2005 F/W Paris and Milano, 동아 TV, p. 80
34 Wood, Ghislaine (2003). Traditional Motifs Essential Art Deco. London: VA&A Publications, p. 21
35 신혜경 (2009). 대중문화의 기만 혹은 해방 벤야민&아도르노. 김영사, p. 149
36 Jen-Luc Daval (1988). Histoire de la peinture abstraite. Hansan, Paris, p. 151
37 한국경제신문, 2006.7.30, 공포패션. 자료검색일2009.7. 10, 자료출처 http://www.hankyung.com
38 Ian Chilvers & Harold Osborne (1988). The Oxford Dictionary of Art. Oxford University Press, p. 61
39 J. Fr$\ddot{u}$chtl (1986). Mimesis: Konstellation eines Zentralbegriffs bei Adorno. K$\ddot{O}$nigshausen & Neumann, W$\ddot{u}$rzbrug, pp. 211-212
40 STYLE.COM, 2004 S/S Christian Dior, 자료검색일 2009.8.1, 자료출처www.style.com
41 자료검색일 2009.7.3, 자료출처 http://kr.dictionary.search.yahoo.com/search/
42 Walter Benjamin (1933). $\ddot{u}$ber das mimetische Verm$\ddot{o}$gen. in W.Benjamin, Gesammelte Schriften II-1, Suhrkamp, pp. 210-213
43 STYLE.COM. 2006 S/S Christian Dior. 자료검색일 2009.8.9, 자료출처 www.style.com
44 Museum of London. Art Deco Style. 자료검색일 2009.7.15, 자료출처 http://arthistory.heindorffhus.dk/frame-Style21-ArtDeco.htm.Retrievedon 2008-11-06
45 구민경 (2003). 예술과 현실의 관계에 비추어 본 미메시스. 단국대학교 대학원 석사학위논문, p. 17
46 Betty Kirke (1991). Madeleine Vionnet. 東海淸美 편저. 服飾美學. 東京: 求龍堂, p. 39
47 G. W. F. Hegel (1986). Vorlsungen $\ddot{u}$ber die $\ddot{A}$sthetik I, Werke, Bd.13, Suhrkamp, Frankfrut/M, p. 15, 178, 190
48 이주영 (1998). 루카치 미학연구. 철학박사 학위논문시리즈, 제15권, 서광사, p. 57
49 W. Tatarukiewicz(1980). A history of six ideas p. 348
50 E. Hamiton and H. Cairns(eds.)(1964), The collected dialogues of Plato including the letters. Bollingen series LXXI(N.T.: Pantheon Books), pp. 746-747 (Republic: VI,511d-e)
51 STYLE.COM, 2004 F/W YvesSaint Laurent, 자료검색일 2009.8.7, 자료출처 www.style.com
52 J. Harvey (1996). Men in Black. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press, p. 41
53 Hauffe, Thomas (1998). Design: A Concise History (1 ed.). London: Laurence King, p. 124