Browse > Article

A Contextual Study of the Pluralization of Sexuality Represented in Mainstream Fashion and Anti-Fashion Since the Late $19^{th}$ Century  

Choi, Kyung-Hee (Dept. of Apparel & Textile Design, Konkuk University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Costume / v.57, no.5, 2007 , pp. 166-182 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to reinterpret sexuality represented in fashion since the latter half of the 19th century in a contextual view, on the basis of Foucauldian idea of post-structural sexuality. As for research methodology, literary research was undertaken from the conception of sexuality to a historical review of the culture and dress. Foucault maintains the view of plural sexuality, which floats by power relationship between dominant and oppositional discourses in a specific historical context. In contextual approach sexual ideology codified in fashion since the latter 19C shows the following aspects: First, the traditional sexual ideology in the latter 19C is a capitalist value, which gives a priority to bourgeois man's profits, and the Victorian discourses of sexuality constructs the dichotomized fashion of the period. Next, the former half of the $20^{th}$ C is regarded as the period of conformity rather than opposition with various alternatives appropriated to the mainstream, so the traditional sexual ideology in fashion of this period is still preserved. Finally, in post-capitalism period of the latter 20C a variety of anti-fashion visualized plural sexuality from the enormous oppositional discourses. Although it doesn't all mean deconstruction of sexuality in fashion by the anti-fashion re-appropriated without oppositional meanings, pluralization of sexuality implies dynamics of sexual discourses in the next historical period. As a result, fashion since the latter 19C has been changed as a means for expressing age and sexual desire out of gender and class. And mainstream fashion in even postmodern period keeps the modern value on the center of the hegemonic heterosexual masculinity though the increase of Androgynous Femininity in women's fashion may connote the meaning of femininity. The plural sexuality represented in fashion has a contextual flexibility, thus sexuality floats with a specific socio-cultural context and fashion represents a masquerade as an identity vehicle.
Keywords
context; sexuality; pluralization; mainstream fashion; anti-fashion;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Foucault, Michel. 이규현 역 (1997). 性의 歷史 - 제 1권 앎의 의지. 서울: 나남출판
2 Butler, Judith (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge, p. 22
3 Kuhne, Thomas. (Ed.) (1996). Mannergeschichte- Geschlechtergeschichte. 조경식, 박은주 역 (2001). 남성의 역사. 서울: 솔, pp. 201-234
4 Entwistle, Joanne and Wilson, Elizabeth (Eds.). (2001), Body dressing. New York, Oxford: Berg, pp, 165-180
5 Entwistle, Joanne (2000). The fashioned body, Cambridge: Polity, p. 116
6 Buckley, Cheryl and Fawcett. Hilary. (2002). Fashioning the feminine. New York: LB. Tauris, PP. 55-57
7 McLaren, Angus (1999). Twentieth century sexuality: A history. 임진영 역(2003). 20세기 성의 역사. 서울: 현실문화연구, pp, 25-44
8 Flugel, J.C. (1930). The psychology of clothes. London: Hogarth Press, pp, 111-112
9 조현순 (2001). 주디스 버틀러의 젠더 정체성 이론 패러디, 수행성, 복종, 우울증을 중심으로. 영미문학 페미니즘, 9(1), p. 179
10 김정선 (1996). 빅토리아 시대 유행복식과 반유행복식운동에 나타난 여성성과 인체미에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 석사학위논문, pp. 7-28
11 Edwards, Tim (1997). Men in the mirror: Men's fashion, masculinity and consumer society. London: Cassell, P. 19
12 Evans, Caroline and Thornton, Minna (1989). Women and fashion. London & New York: Quartet books