Browse > Article

A Study on the Architectural Paradigms expressed in Fashion since 1990s -Focusing on the Similarity of Spatial Construction Systems-  

Yang, Hee-Young (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Sookmyung Women's University)
Yang, Sook-Hi (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Sookmyung Women's University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Costume / v.56, no.7, 2006 , pp. 85-100 More about this Journal
Abstract
Fashion related with architectural paradigms includes concept of the space utilization beyond fashions field. Such a fashions concept is able to enlarge as a spatial system like architecture. Interface between fashion and architecture is originated in thinking of the rhizome, which understands fashions field within various relationships between environment of the city and fashion. The existing construction systems of fashion is not sufficient in fashions roles as the space that wearing changing body continuously. Consequently, accommodation of architectural paradigms in fashion depends on new recognition about function and space. Architectural paradigms expressed in fashion since 1990s was classified as follows: 1 modular system of Le Corbusier & Archigram, 2 deconstruction, 3 reconstruction, 4 nomadic architecture. Such a paradigms has been easy to combination among fashion and architecture and furniture. Deconstruction and reconstruction fashion revealed process toward completion, and reappeared architectural consideration about process of change toward incompletion. There are acknowledged formative characteristics as follows: mobility, changeability, multi-function, mutual combinative, openness, and fluidity. This study shows that fashion is essential device determined city environment construction in 21C, and revels that fashion has been highlighted as a presage of new spatial economy received architectural construction systems.
Keywords
architectural paradigms; modular system; deconstruction; reconstruction; nomadic architecture;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 이건섭 (2005). 20세 기 건축의 모힘. 서울; 수유산방, p. 35
2 Bradley Quinn (2003). The Fashion of Architecture. New Yark: Berg, p. 80
3 Bradley Quinn (2003) The Fashion of Architecture. New Yark: Berg, p. 8
4 Bradley Quinn (2003). The Fashion of Architecture. New Yark: Berg, 112-115
5 Kosuke Tsumura, 검색일 : 2006년 4월 5일, 자료출처 http://www.finalhome.com/
6 하지수, 김민자 (2002). 20세 기 기능주의 패션디자인의 미적 가치외 조형성. 복식, 52 (6), pp. 85-102
7 오현선 (2003). 몸의 관점으로 본 현대건축의 표현앙상 연구. 국민대학교 석사학위논문, p. 44
8 오현선 (2003). 몸의 관점으로 본 현대건축의 표현앙상 연구. 국민대학교 석사학위논문, p. 11
9 원윤경 (2002). 르 꼬르뷔지에 건축에서 신체인식에 관 한 언구 국민대학교 석사학위논문, p. 49
10 Simon thorougood, 검색일 : 2006년 4윌 7일 자료출처 http://www.google/simon thorougood/
11 강림아, 이효진 (2003) 현대패션에 표현된 증세 종교복 이미지의 조형성 연구. 복식문화연구, 11(5), pp 737-752
12 박정남 (2002) 시대적 변천에 따른 유동적 공간의 특 성에 관한 연구. 건국대학교 석사학위논문, P. 21
13 전혜창 (2002) 그리스 조상에 나타난 복식의 조형성 연구 -드레이퍼리와 주름을 중심으로 . 패션비지니스, 6(1). pp. 102-115
14 이봉덕, 양숙희 (2001), 파코라반 작품에 표현된 다원 주의. 복식문화연구, 9(1), pp. 141-153