Browse > Article

Humor Expressed in Modern Fashion  

이윤진 (건국대학교 의류학과)
박명희 (건국대학교 의상학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Costume / v.53, no.5, 2003 , pp. 33-48 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to define the moaning and features of humor in modern fashion. by examining how it's being grafted into fashion, based on artistic expression including collage, assemblage, photo montage, graffiti, transformation, distortion, exaggeration and optical illusion. Beside. humor of fashion is to examine not only laugh and fun but also formative expression and creativity. Furthermore, it is to enlarge the range of conception for future fashion. The findings of this study could be described as below: The features of humorous fashion by collage and assemblage boiled down to unexpectedness, disharmony and creativity. The photo montage was marked by popularity, reproduction and recreativity, and graffiti was characterized by attention, simpleness, and amusement. And there were unexpectedness, creativity and strangeness in transformation, distortion, magnification and optical illusion. The meaning of humorous fashion that carries such features could eventually be summarized into the followings : First, the fashion, from which collage, assemblage, photo montage. graffiti, transformation, distortion, magnification and optical illusion were detected. could be sorted out into several categories that used different things : introduction of objects of different nature, dramatic impression and wit based on photo montage technique, introduction of comic components and infant image, and destruction of aesthetic principles. Second, the substance of humor in art could be applied to fashion design as well as visual art. Humor is a property related to accidental, unexpected incident, behavior, situation or idea, and it puts laugh, disharmony or awkwardness in fashion. Third, spicing fashion with humor could serve to draw people's attention, break down the barrier among people exposed to dry sentiment, and connect the public with art.
Keywords
Distortion; Exaggeration; Optical illusion;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 한얼유머동호회 (2002). 유머학. 미래문화사. p. 68
2 김미조 (1995), 한국 TV 유머 광고에 관한 연구. 서강대학교 대학원 석사학위논문. p. 12
3 광고 연구 (1999). 제 42호. pp. 133-157
4 박강희 (1988). 미학사전. 서울 : 논장편집부. p. 401
5 편집부 엮음 (1993). 미학사전. 논장. p. 401
6 문지사 (1977). 문예대사전. p. 110
7 Janet Fox. (1974). Modular Art Education. Iowa University of Huston Press. p. 4
8 http://www.lacos.do.kr
9 정홍숙 (1995). 근대 복식 문화사. 교문사. pp. 16-17
10 정주옥 (1999). 골계미의 지도 방향 연구 -김유정과 채만식의 작품을 중심으로-. 아주대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문, p. 5
11 http://www.interiors.co.kr/interior/dic/ta/ta5.htm
12 박강희 (1998). 미학사전. 논장 편집부. p. 399
13 Arthur Asa Berger. (1976). Anatomy of the Joke. Journal of Communication. pp. 113-114
14 박진아 (1998). 낙서화와 키스헤링 ( Keith Haring)의 회화에 관하여. 홍익대학교 대학원 석사학위논문. p. 7
15 이금란 (1992). 현대인의 소외현상에 관한 시각적 표현 - Deformation을 중심으로 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문. pp. 16-17
16 Aaron Schapf. 문범역(역). (1988). 미술과 사진. 미진 신서. p. 332
17 Encyclopedia Britannica. (1974). Knowledge in depth. 9. p. 5
18 천장옥 (1999). 패러디 활동이 유아의 조망수용능력에 미치는 효과 연구. 인제대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문. p. 22
19 S. V. humor. (1970). The New Book of Knowledge. New York: Grolier Incorploated. p. 65
20 김정재 (2000). 건축의장론 예니. p. 179
21 향림서원 (2000). 두산세계 대백과사전. p. 435
22 http://news.naver.com/news_read.php?oldid=1997 010600000290042&s=0.173.347&e =75.252.420
23 박진아 (1998). Keith Haring의 회화에 관하여. 홍익대학교 대학원 석사학위논문. p. 68
24 김정재 (2000). 건축의장론. 예니. p. 180
25 L. Hutcheon 김상구, 윤여복 엮 (1992). A Theory of Parody-The Teaching of Twentieth century Art Form. 패러디이론. 문예출판사. pp. 55-56
26 Michel Laclotte. (1978). Petit Larousse de la Peinture Paris. p. 361
27 Arthur Pollard. 송낙현(역). (1978). 풍자. 서울대학교 출판부. p. 95
28 월간미술 편집부 (1998). 미술용어대사전. 월간미술, p.64
29 김용환 (1992). 광고에 있어서 유우머 소구효과에 관한 연구. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문. p. 6
30 J. N. Hook. S. V. humor. (1970). The World Book Encyclopedia. U.S.A Field Enterprises Educational Cooperation. pp. 18-19
31 서성록 (1989). 포스트 모던 패러디와 차용된 표절. 월간 미술. p. 23
32 민중서림 편집부 (1990). 엣센스 영한사전. 민중서림. p. 1024
33 정주옥 (1999). 골계미의 지도 방향 연구 -김유정과 채만식의 작품을 중심으로-. 아주대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문. p. 6
34 http://kr.encycl.yahoo.com/final.html?id=105475