1 |
Roth WM. Activism or Science, Technology Education as Byproduct of Capacity Building. Journal for Activism in Science & Technology Education. 2009;1(1):16-31.
|
2 |
장지영, 문지영, 유효숙, 최경희, Joseph Krajcik. 과학과 관련된 사회, 윤리적 문제(SSI)의 맥락에 따른 중학생들의 인성적 태도와 가치관 분석. 한국과학교육학회지. 2012;32(7):1124-1138.
과학기술학회마을
DOI
|
3 |
유승엽. 원자력발전에 대한 국민 신뢰감 회복 PR 정책방향. 디지털정책관리학회. 2013;11(10):287-294.
|
4 |
조선대학교. 방사선조사 의료용품에 대한 국민이해도 제고 방안 연구. 과학기술부. 2005.
|
5 |
John W, Malone J. Consumer willingness to purchase and to pay more for potential benefits of irradiated fresh food products. Agribusiness 1990;6(2):163-178.
DOI
|
6 |
Foster A. The Impact of Consumer Acceptance on Trade in Irradiated Foods. Journal of British Food. 1990;92(5):28-34.
|
7 |
조경영, 문주현. 원자력시설 주변 지역주민의 원자력에 대한 인식조사. 대한방사성폐기물학회. 2011;9(3):181-189.
|
8 |
김태호. 원자력발전의 안전성 담보 시스템에 대한 법적 검토: 발전용 원자로에 대한 리스크 관리를 중심으로. 행정법이론실무학회 행정법 연구. 2011;30:39-65.
|
9 |
고려대학교. 원자력 안전문화 프로그램의 효과성 향상 방안. 한국원자력연구소. 2006.
|
10 |
김민훈. 원자력 안전규제에 대한 법제 고찰. 부산대학교 법학연구. 2012;53(2):53-77.
|
11 |
Hodson D. Time for Action: Science Education for an Alternative Future. International Journal of Science Education. 2003;25(6):645-670.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Slovic P. Perception of Risk from Radiation, London; Earthscan Publication Ltd. 2000:264-274.
|
13 |
Honkanen P, Verplanken B. Understanding Attitudes towards Genetically Modified Food: The Role of Values and Attitude Strength. Journal of Consumer Policy. 2004;27:401-420.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Bem D. The Concept of Risk in the Study of Human Behavior. In J. Dowie, P. Lefrere II, (Eds.), Risk and Chance, Milton Keynes, England, The Open University Press. 1980;1-15.
|
15 |
이재신. 미디어 형식과 위험 메시지 구성이 감정적 위험인식과 행위의도에 미치는 영향. 인지과학. 2012;23(4):457-485.
과학기술학회마을
|
16 |
조성경, 오세기. 원자력시설 및 정책의 수용성에 영향을 미치는 인식인자 도출에 관한 이론적 고찰. 한국에너지공학회지. 2002;11(4):332-341.
과학기술학회마을
|
17 |
박균성. 원자력 안전법제의 재검토. 행정법이론실무학회 행정법연구. 2012;33:169-190.
|
18 |
Bird DK, Haynes K, Honert RVD, McAneney J, Poortinga W. Nuclear Power in Australia: A Comparative Analysis of Public Opinion Regarding Climate Change and the Fukushima Disaster. Energy Policy (In Press).
|
19 |
Siegrist M, Visschers VHM. Acceptance of Nuclear Power: The Fukushima Effect. Energy Policy. 2012;59:112-119.
|
20 |
Prati G, Zani B. The Effect of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident on Risk Perception, Antinuclear Behavioral Intentions, Attitude, Trust, Environmental Beliefs, and Values. Environment and Behavior. 2012;45:782-798.
|
21 |
Yamamura E. Experience of Technological and Natural Disaster and their Impact on the Perceived Risk of Nuclear Accidents After the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster in Japan 2011: A Cross-country Analysis. The Journal of Socio-Economics. 2012;41:360-363.
DOI
|
22 |
김효정, 김미라. 방사선조사 식품에 대한 소비자의 태도. 대한가정학회지. 2003;41(5):119-130.
|
23 |
Slovic P. Perception of Risk: Reflection on the Psychometric Paradigm. In D. Golding & S. Krimsky(Eds.) Theory of Risk. 1992;117-152.
|
24 |
Slovic P. Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics and Science: Surveying the Risk Assessment Battlefield. London: Earthscan Publication Ltd. 2000;390-412.
|
25 |
Showers DE, Shrigley RL, Lobert L. Effect of Knowledge and Persuasion on High School Students' Attitudes toward Nuclear Power Plant. J. Research in Science Teaching. 1995;32:29-43.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Krimsky S. The Role of Theory in Risk Studies. Social Theories of Risk, Praeger, New York. 1992:3-23.
|
27 |
Slovic P. Perception of Risk. Science, 1987;236:280-285.
DOI
|
28 |
Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein D, Read D, Combs B. How Safe is Safe enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes towards Technological Risks and Benefits. Policy Sciences. 1978;9(2):127-152.
DOI
|
29 |
김재윤. 원자력과 방사성물질등의 위험에 대한 형법적 보호. 법학연구. 2012;45:289.
|
30 |
Peter E, Slovic P. The Role of Affect and Worldviews as Orienting Dispositions in the Perception and Acceptance of Nuclear Power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1996;26:1427-1453.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
31 |
김대근, 전현욱. 후기현대사회의 위험관리를 위한 형법 및 형사정책연구(I): 선진 과학기술사회의 위험관리 형사정책. 경제.인문사회연구회 협동연구 총서; 한국형사정책연구원. 2012.
|
32 |
Zeidler DL, Sadler TD, Simmons ML, Howes EV. Beyond STS: A Research-based, Framework for Socioscientific Issues Education. Science Education. 2005;89:357-377.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
33 |
Sadler TD. Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues: A Critical Review of the Research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2004;41:513-536.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
34 |
Slovic P. Perceived Risk, Trust, and Democracy. Risk Analysis. 1993;13(6):675-682.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
35 |
Roberts DA. Scientific literacy. In Abell SK. Lederman NG(Eds.); Handbook of Research on Science Education. 2007;729-780.
|