Browse > Article

A Study of the Couplant Effects on Contact Ultrasonic Testing  

Kim, Young-H. (School of Mechanical Engineering, Sungkyunwan University)
Song, Sung-Jin (School of Mechanical Engineering, Sungkyunwan University)
Lee, Sung-Sik (Korea Inspection & Engineering Co. Ltd.)
Lee, Jeong-Ki (Korea Inspection & Engineering Co. Ltd.)
Hong, Soon-Shin (Korea Advanced Inspection Technology, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)
Eom, Heung-Seop (Integrated Safety Assessment Team, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)
Publication Information
Abstract
The amplitude of a back-wall echo depends on the reflection coefficient of the interface between a transducer and a test material when using contact pulse-echo ultrasonic testing. A couplant is used to transmit ultrasonic energy across the interface, but has an influence on the amplitude of the pulse-echo signal. To investigate the couplant effect on pulse-echo ultrasonic testing, back-wall echoes are measured by using various couplants made of water and glycerine in a carbon and austenitic stainless steel specimens. The amplitude of the first back-wall echo and the apparent attenuation coefficient increases with the acoustic impedance of the couplant. The couplant having a higher value of the transmission coefficient is more effective for flaw detection. The reflection coefficient should be known in order to measure the attenuation coefficient of the test material.
Keywords
ultrasonics; contact method; couplant; glycerine; apparent attenuation coefficient;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Vincent, A. (1987) Influence of wearplate and coupling layer thickness on ultrasonic velocity measurement, Ultrasonics. Vol. 25, pp. 237-243
2 Kinsler, L. B., Frey, A. R., Coppens, A. B. and Sanders, J. V.(1980) Fundamentals of Acoustics, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, pp. 124-134 & p. 462
3 Golis, M. J. (1992) 'The Ultrasonic Level III Study Guide,' ASNT, Columbus, OH, pp. 13-19
4 Birks, A. S., Green, Jr., R. E. and Mcintire, P. (1991) Ultrasonic Testing, Nondestructive Testing Handbook, 2nd ed., Vol. 7, ASNT, Columbus, OH, pp. 377-390
5 Rose, J. L. and Meyer, P. A. (1974) Ultrasonic Signal-Processing Concepts for Measuring the Thickness of Thin Layer, Mater. Eval, Vol. 32, No. 2 32(2), pp. 249-225
6 Store R. A. (1991) Practice for the Measurement of the apparent Attenuation of longitudinal Ultrasonic Waves by Immersion Method, ASTM Section, 3, Volume 0303, E664-78, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 263-265