Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15204/jkobgy.2012.25.3.117

Clinical Study on the Effect of Chuna Manupulation in Treating Postpartum Patients with Low Back Pain and Pelvic Girdle Pain  

Lee, Sung-Cheul (Dept. of Oriental Obstetrics & Gynecology, Gang-Nam Jaseng Hospital of Oriental Medicine)
Bae, Sang-Eun (Dept. of Oriental Obstetrics & Gynecology, Gang-Nam Jaseng Hospital of Oriental Medicine)
Kim, Hee-Jeong (Dept. of Oriental Obstetrics & Gynecology, Gang-Nam Jaseng Hospital of Oriental Medicine)
Kim, In-Joong (Dept. of Oriental Obstetrics & Gynecology, Gang-Nam Jaseng Hospital of Oriental Medicine)
Shin, Joon-Sik (Dept. of Oriental Obstetrics & Gynecology, Gang-Nam Jaseng Hospital of Oriental Medicine)
Kim, Chul-Soo (Dept. of Oriental Obstetrics & Gynecology, An-San Jaseng Hospital of Oriental Medicine)
Ahn, Young-Tae (Dept. of Oriental Obstetrics & Gynecology, Bu-Chun Jaseng Hospital of Oriental Medicine)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Obstetrics and Gynecology / v.25, no.3, 2012 , pp. 117-131 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives: This study was designed to observe the effect of chuna manupulation in alleviating the symptoms of postpartum patients with low back pain and pelvic girdle pain. Methods: Targeted by outpatient 30 postpartum patients, A group was patients who were treated with acupuncture, traditional Korean medicine, physical therapy, B group was patients who were treated with acupuncture, traditional Korean medicine, physical therapy, and chuna manupulation. After 2-months, the progress of symptoms was evaluated by visual analogue scale(VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) and Pain drawing. Results: 1. Group A and B were analyzed for general characteristics, with an average age of both groups, average weeks at admission after delivery, parity and method of delivery, weight gain and BMI during pregnancy were no significant differences in. 2. VNRS improvement in the rate of group A was $2.84{\pm}4.73$, VNRS improvement in the rate of group B was $4.85{\pm}1.49$. Between the two groups was statistically significant. 3. ODI improvement rate in group A was $10.14{\pm}4,39$, ODI improvement rate in Group B was $15.16{\pm}3.41$. Between the two groups was statistically significant. 4. Patients who received acupuncture, traditional Korean medicine, physical therapy, and chuna manupulation. in group B compared pubis, thighs, buttocks showing more effective in pain relief than group A, who received only acupuncture, traditional Korean medicine, physical therapy. Conclusions: In case of postpartum patients with low back pain and pelvic girdle pain, it is more effective to treat with Integrated traditional Korean therapy and chuna manupulation than to treat with only integrated traditional Korean therapy.
Keywords
Postpartum; Low Back Pain; Pelvic girdle pain; Chuna manupulation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 최묘경 등. 요통 환자에 대한 임상 분석. 가정의학회지. 1991;12(3):17-22.
2 석세일. 척추 외과학. 제3판. 서울:최신의학사. 1999:177.
3 Wang SM, et al. Auricular acupuncture as a treatment for pregnant women who have low back and posterior pelvic pain: a pilot study. American journal obstetrics & gynecology. 2009; 271:1-9.
4 Ostgaard HC, Andersson GB. Low back pain postpartum. Spine. 1992; 17:53-5.   DOI
5 김경모, 박소연, 이충휘. 요통 환자의 일반적 특성에 따른 한국어판 오스웨스티리 장애 설문지의 라쉬분석. 한국 전문 물리치료학회지. 2011;18(2):35-42.
6 송병기. 한방 부인과학 제2판. 서울:행림출판. 1992:98, 194, 472-3.
7 대한 한방부인과학회 편저. 한방 여성의학. 서울:의성당. 2012:692, 765, 775.
8 Giles LG, Muller R. a randomized clinical trial comparing medication, acupuncture, and spinal manipulation. Spine. 2003;28(14):1490-503.
9 신병철 등. 정형추나의학. 서울:척추 신경추나의학회. 2006:4, 58-9.
10 Guerreiro, et al. Acupuncture for low back pain in pregnancy-a prospective, quasi-randomised, controlled study. Acupunct Med. 2004;22(2):60-7.   DOI
11 Elden, et al. Effects of acupuncture and stabilising exercises as adjunct to standard treatment in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain: Randomised single blind controlled trial. Epub. 2005;330(7494):761.
12 Stugea B, Holma I, Vilestad N. To treat or not to treat postpartum pelvic girdle pain with stabilizing exercises?. Manual Therapy. 2006;11:337-43.   DOI
13 Robinson HS, et al. Pelvic girdle pain: Potential risk factors in pregnancy in relation to disability and pain intensity three months postpartum. Manual therapy. 2010;15:522-8.   DOI
14 심미정. 산후 여성의 임신중 요통, 요통장애와 분만 중 통증에 관한 연구. 여성건강간호학회지. 2004;10(1): 8-14.
15 대한 통증학회편저. 통증의학. 서울: 군자출판사. 2000:36.
16 Fairbank J, Pynsent P. The Owenstry disability index. Spine. 2000;25:2940-52.   DOI
17 전국한의과대학 재활의학 교실 편저. 한방 재활의학과학. 서울:성원당. 1995: 307-13.
18 박정율. 만성요통의 진단과 치료. 가정의학회지. 2001;22(9):1349-62.
19 Stuge B. Diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2010;130(21):2141-5.   DOI
20 대한 산부인과학회 교과서편찬위원회. 산과학. 서울:칼빈서적. 1997:332, 745-8.
21 대한 산부인과학회. 산과학. 서울:군자출판사. 2007:358-60, 477.
22 김시영, 이인선. 産後風의 원인에 대한 文獻的 考察. 대한한방부인과학회지. 1993;6(1):117-24.
23 蘇誠煉, 沈紹功 主編. 中醫痛症大成. 福健:福健科學技術出版社. 1996:296-99.
24 신병철 등. 정형추나의학. 서울:척추 신경추나의학회. 2006:44.
25 Davis DC. The discomforts of pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nursing. 1996;25(1):73-81.   DOI
26 DeJoseph JF, Cragin L. Biomedical and feminist perspectives on low back pain during pregnancy. Orthopedic Nursing. 1998;33(4):713-24.
27 심미정. 임부의 요, 골반통 완화 프로그램 효과. 전남대학교대학원. 2002: 7-11.
28 Ostgaard HC, Andersson GB, Karlsson K. Prevalence of back pain in pregnancy. Spine. 1991;16(5):549-52.   DOI
29 정희원. 근육학 총설. 서울:목과토. 2002:480-9.
30 Albert H, Godskesen M, Westergaard J. Prognosis in four syndromes of pregnancyrelated pelvic pain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(6): 505-10.   DOI
31 Gutke A, Ostgaard HC, Oberg B. Pelvic girdle pain and lumbar pain in pregnancy:a cohort study of the consequences in terms of health and functioning. Spine. 2006;31(5):149-55.   DOI