Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5916/jkosme.2013.37.6.611

Comparison of emission characteristics between fuel injection systems with echanical cam and electric control type on low speed 2 stroke diesel engine for ship propulsion  

Lee, Sang Deuk (Department of Ship Operation, Korea Maritime and Ocean University)
Koh, Dae Kwon (Department of Mechanical System Engineering, Pukyong National University)
Jung, Suk Ho (Department of Mechanical System Engineering, Pukyong National University)
Abstract
Many researches have been carried out consistently for the green ship owing to its economic increasement, efficiency and convenience. One of them is an electronic controlled marine diesel engine. However, we are suffered from dissemination of above engine, due to its anxiety about safety and reliability. In order to solve these problems in this study, emission characteristics test of main propulsive two-stroke diesel engine, equipped both electronic control and cam drive fuel injection systems, has been performed and evaluated under the various load conditions. From the test results, we have confirmed that exhaust gas emission characteristics of the electronic control system is similar to the cam drive system in eco-mode operation, but NOx in emission mode has been decreased 100ppm or more in full load condition. HC emission from the electronic control system is decreased 10~20ppm at 50% load, and 35~40ppm at 25% load in comparison to cam drive system. In fuel consumption, it is considered that 7g/kWh is decreased than the value of cam drive system at 700bar of injection pressure, which is 200bar higher than cam drive system.
Keywords
Green ship; Electronic control system; Cam drive system; Main engine; Emission;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 J. Hlousek, Common Rail System for Large Diesel Engines", CIMAC Congress 2004, no. 117, pp. 1-6, 2004.
2 T. S. Kundsen, C. E. Egeberg, O. Grone, and N. Kjemtup, "The MC/MC-C engines and their development to meet present and future demands", CIMAC Congress 2004, no. 81, pp. 1-12, 2004.
3 T. S. Knudsen and C. E. Egeberg, "Design of the new two-stroke engines from MAN diesel A/S", CIMAC Congress 2007, no. 68, pp. 1-13, 2007.
4 H. Brunner, M. Betschart and S. Fankhauser, "Common-rail Wartsila two-stroke engines in practice", CIMAC Congress 2007, no. 77, pp. 1-14, 2007.
5 M. Sugihara, K. Edo, and T. Tanida, "Creating a whole range of benefits with the Mitsubishi UEC eco-engine", CIMAC Congress 2007, no. 75, pp. 1-10, 2007.
6 M. Flory and J. Hiltner, "Engine control system development using rapid prototyping hardware and software", CIMAC Congress 2007, no. 179, pp. 1-13, 2007.
7 G. Stumpp and M. Ricco, Common Rail - An Attractive Fuel Injection System for Passenger Car DI Diesel Engines, SAE Technical Paper Series, no. 960870, pp. 183-191, 1996.
8 U. Flaig, W. Polach and G. Ziegler, Common Rail System (CR-System) for Passenger Car DI Diesel Engines; Experiences with Applications for Series Production Projects, SAE Technical Paper Series, no. 1999-01-0191, pp. 1-10, 1999.