Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2010.51.6.391

Predictors of PSA Screening Among Men Over 40 Years of Age Who Had Ever Heard about PSA  

Seo, Hyung-Seok (Department of Sports Medicine, Konyang University)
Lee, Nam-Kyu (Department of Urology, Soonchunhyang University)
Publication Information
Investigative and Clinical Urology / v.51, no.6, 2010 , pp. 391-397 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate social and behavioral factors associated with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in men in California, United States, who were over 40 years of age and had ever heard about PSA screening. Materials and Methods: This survey was administered as a random-digit-dialing telephone survey to produce reliable estimates of medium-sized counties. It surveyed 42,000 households and interviewed 58,407 people randomly. It considered socioeconomic status and health behavior as affecting PSA screening. Access to health care was measured as having regular health care access. The main outcome measure was self-report of ever having undergone PSA screening at least once in the respondent's lifetime. Results: Of 8,864 respondents, 82.2% were White, 7.7% were Latin, 4.2% were African American, and 5.9% were Asian. The respondents' mean age was 60.13 years. Age was the significant factor for PSA screening. Respondents aged 50-59 years were 3.5 times as likely to have undergone PSA screening as were those aged 40-49 years (OR=3.49, p$\leq$0.001). Race was not statistically significant after considering other factors. People who had never married had statistically significantly lower screening than did people who were married (OR=0.71, p=0.001). Poverty levels were statistically significant in both the unadjusted and the adjusted analysis. People who had no regular health care access were much less likely to have undergone PSA screening than were people who had regular health care access (OR=0.22, p=0.001). Conclusions: The likelihood of PSA screening was positively associated with increased age, marital status (married), higher socioeconomic status (higher federal poverty level and higher educational attainment), and health care access. However, there was no statistically significant association of PSA screening with race, employment, exercise, smoking, or drinking status.
Keywords
Mass screening; Prostate-specific antigen;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By SCOPUS : 3
연도 인용수 순위
1 Pearlman DN, Rakowski W, Ehrich B, Clark MA. Breast cancer screening practices among black, Hispanic, and white women: reassessing differences. Am J Prev Med 1996;12:327-37.
2 Klein EA, Platz EA, Thompson IM. Epidemiology, etiology, and prevention of prostate cancer. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, editors. Campbell-Walsh urology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2007;2854-73.
3 Smith RA, von Eschenbach AC, Wender R, Levin B, Byers T, Rothenberg D, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: update of early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers. Also: update 2001-- testing for early lung cancer detection. CA Cancer J Clin 2001; 51:38-75.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Resnick MJ, Canter DJ, Guzzo TJ, Bruker BM, Bergey M, Sonnad SS, et al. Does race affect postoperative outcomes in patients with low-risk prostate cancer who undergo radical prostatectomy? Urology 2009;73:620-3.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Phillips KA, Kerlikowske K, Baker LC, Chang SW, Brown ML. Factors associated with women's adherence to mammography screening guidelines. Health Serv Res 1998;33:29-53.
6 Potosky AL, Breen N, Graubard BI, Parsons PE. The association between health care coverage and the use of cancer screening tests. Results from the 1992 National Health Interview Survey. Med Care 1998;36:257-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Ross LE, Coates RJ, Breen N, Uhler RJ, Potosky AL, Blackman D. Prostate-specific antigen test use reported in the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Prev Med 2004;38:732-44.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Breen N, Wagener DK, Brown ML, Davis WW, Ballard-Barbash R. Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:1704-13.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Liu L, Cozen W, Bernstein L, Ross RK, Deapen D. Changing relationship between socioeconomic status and prostate cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:705-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Smith DS, Bullock AD, Catalona WJ, Herschman JD. Racial differences in a prostate cancer screening study. J Urol 1996;156: 1366-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Clegg LX, Reichman ME, Miller BA, Hankey BF, Singh GK, Lin YD, et al. Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Cancer Causes Control 2009;20:417-35.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Stattin P, Holmberg E, Bratt O, Adolfsson J, Johansson JE, Hugosson J. Surveillance and deferred treatment for localized prostate cancer. Population based study in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden. J Urol 2008;180:2423-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Jones BA, Liu WL, Araujo AB, Kasl SV, Silvera SN, Solar-Vila H, et al. Explaining the race difference in prostate cancer stage at diagnosis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17:2825- 34.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Sirovich BE, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Screening men for prostate and colorectal cancer in the United States: does practice reflect the evidence? JAMA 2003;289:1414-20.   DOI   ScienceOn