Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2021.31.3.327

A Comparative Analysis of Healthcare-Associated Infection Policy in South Korea and Its Implications in Coronavirus Disease 2019  

Jeong, Yoolwon (Ministry of Health and Welfare)
Kim, Kinam (Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency)
Publication Information
Health Policy and Management / v.31, no.3, 2021 , pp. 312-327 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Infection prevention and control (IPC) to manage healthcare-associated infection (HCAI) has emerged as one of the most significant public health issues in Korea. The purpose of this study is to draw implications in IPC policies by analyzing the context, process, and major actors in policy development and comparatively analyzing IPC policy contents of Korea with three other countries. Additionally, IPC policies were analyzed in the context of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to provide implications for future pandemics and HCAI events. Methods: This study incorporates a qualitative approach based on document and content analysis, applying codes and thematic categorization. IPC policy contents are comparatively analyzed by adopting the concept model, developed by the World Health Organization, which consists of core components of IPC structure at the national and facility level. Results: National IPC policies were developed within a complex social and political context, through the involvement of various stakeholders. IPC policies in Korea place a high emphasis on establishing IPC programs and built environments in healthcare facilities, whereas there were potentials for improvement in policies involving patients and promoting a safety culture. IPC policies, which currently focus on general hospitals and certain functions of hospitals, should further be expanded to target all healthcare facilities and functions, to ensure more efficient and sustainable IPC responses in the current and future disease outbreaks. Conclusion: IPC is a complex policy arena and lessons learned from the analysis of existing policies in the context of COVID-19 should provide valuable strategic implications for future policies.
Keywords
Health policy; Policy making; Infection control; COVID-19; Republic of Korea;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kim SW. Improving patient safety through prevention of healthcare associated infections. J Korean Med Assoc 2015;58(2):116-122. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2015.58.2.116.   DOI
2 Clinical Excellence Commission. Infection prevention and control practice handbook [Internet]. 2020. Haymarket (NSW): Clinical Excellence Commission; 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 17]. Available from: https://www.cec.health.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/383239/IPC-Practice-Handbook-2020.PDF.
3 World Health Organization. Minimum requirements for infection prevention and control programs. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.
4 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim infection prevention and control recommendations for healthcare personnel during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2021 [cited 2021 Mar 17]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/infection-control-recommendations.html.
5 European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Infection prevention and control and preparedness for COVID-19 in healthcare settings: sixth update (9 February 2021). Stockholm: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control; 2021.
6 Walt G, Gilson L. Reforming the health sector in developing countries: the central role of policy analysis. Health Policy Plan 1994;9(4):353-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/9.4.353.   DOI
7 O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med 2014;89(9):1245-1251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.   DOI
8 Leichter HM. A comparative approach to policy analysis: health care policy in four nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1979.
9 Schmeer K. Guidelines for conducting a stakeholder analysis. Bethesda (MD): Partnerships for Health Reform, Abt Associates Inc.; 1999.
10 Aghdassi SJS, Hansen S, Bischoff P, Behnke M, Gastmeier P. A national survey on the implementation of key infection prevention and control structures in German hospitals: results from 736 hospitals conducting the WHO Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF). Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2019;8:73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0532-4.   DOI
11 Aghdassi SJ, Grisold A, Wechsler-Fordos A, Hansen S, Bischoff P, Behnke M, et al. Evaluating infection prevention and control programs in Austrian acute care hospitals using the WHO infection prevention and control assessment framework. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2020;9:92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-00761-2.   DOI
12 World Health Organization. Health care without avoidable infections: the critical role of infection prevention and control. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
13 World Health Organization. Guidelines on core components of infection prevention and control programs at the national and acute health care facility level. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
14 Ministry of Health and Welfare. National policy for prevention and management of healthcare-associated infection 2018-2022 [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2018 [cited 2021 Mar 17]. Available from: http://www.mohw.go.kr/react/al/sal0301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=04&MENU_ID=0403&page=1&CONT_SEQ=345237.
15 World Health Organization. Report on the burden of endemic health care-associated infection worldwide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
16 Song JH, Kim S, Kim KM, Choi SJ, Oh HS, Park ES, et al. Prospective estimation of extra health care costs and hospitalization due to nosocomial infections in Korean hospitals. Korean J Healthc Assoc Infect Control Prev 1999;4(2):157-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14192/kjicp.1999.4.2.157.   DOI
17 Lee J. The present and future of infection control policy in Korea. Korean J Healthc Assoc Infect Control Prev 2020;25(2):70-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14192/kjicp.2020.25.2.70.   DOI
18 Jun B. Middle East respiratory syndrome outbreak and infectious disease control in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc 2015;58(7):590-593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2015.58.7.590.   DOI
19 Kim Y. Healthcare policy and healthcare utilization behavior to improve hospital infection control after the Middle East respiratory syndrome outbreak. J Korean Med Assoc 2015;58(7):598-605. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2015.58.7.598.   DOI
20 World Health Organization. Infection prevention and control during health care when coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is suspected or confirmed. Interim guidance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.
21 World Health Organization. Infection prevention and control healthcare facility response for COVID-19: interim guidance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.
22 NSW Ministry of Health. Infection prevention and control policy [Internet]. St. Leonards (NSW): NSW Ministry of Health; 2017 [cited 2021 Mar 17]. Available from: https://www1.health.nsw.gov.au/pds/ActivePDSDocuments/PD2017_013.pdf.
23 Department of Health, Republic of South Africa. The national infection prevention and control policy and strategy [Internet]. Cape Town: Department of Health, Republic of South Africa; 2007 [cited 2021 Mar 17]. Available from: https://www.knowledgehub.org.za/system/files/elibdownloads/2019-07/IPC%2520Policy.pdf.
24 National Assembly, Health and Welfare Committee. Reports of annual audit of government agencies by the National Assembly [Internet]. Seoul: National Assembly; 2017 [cited 2021 Mar 17]. Available from: http://likms.assembly.go.kr/record/index.jsp.
25 Department of Health, Republic of South Africa. National infection prevention and control strategic framework [Internet]. Cape Town: Department of Health, Republic of South Africa; 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 17]. Available from: https://www.nicd.ac.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/National-Infection-Prevention-and-Control-Strategic-Framework-March-2020-1.pdf.
26 Healthcare Improvement Scotland. Healthcare associated infection standards [Internet]. Edinburgh: Healthcare Improvement Scotland; 2015 [cited 2021 Mar 17]. Available from: https://www.healthcareimprovementscotland.org/our_work/standards_and_guidelines/stnds/hai_standards_2015.aspx.
27 NHS National Services Scotland. National infection prevention and control manual [Internet]. Glasgow: NHS National Services Scotland; 2013 [cited 2021 Mar 17]. Available from: https://www.nipcm.scot.nhs.uk/.
28 National Assembly, Health and Welfare Committee. Reports of annual audit of government agencies by the National Assembly [Internet]. Seoul: National Assembly; 2015 [cited 2021 Mar 17]. Available from: http://likms.assembly.go.kr/record/index.jsp.
29 Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency; Ministry of Health and Welfare. Guideline for healthcare facility management on COVID-19 [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2021 [cited 2021 Jun 25]. Available from: http://ncov.mohw.go.kr/upload/ncov/file/202104/1617239052038_20210401100412.pdf.
30 Saidi T, Salie F, Douglas TS. Towards understanding the drivers of policy change: a case study of infection control policies for multi-drug resistant tuberculosis in South Africa. Health Res Policy Syst 2017;15(1):41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0203-y.   DOI