Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2020.30.4.461

The Effect of Converting Health Insurance Qualification on Medical Use  

Na, Young-Kyoon (Health Insurance Research Institute, National Health Insurance Service)
Cha, Yerin (Health Insurance Research Institute, National Health Insurance Service)
Kim, Nayoung (Health Insurance Research Institute, National Health Insurance Service)
Lee, Youngjae (Division of Medical Assistance, Office for Social Welfare Policy, Ministry of Health and Welfare)
Lee, Yong-Gab (Health Insurance Research Institute, National Health Insurance Service)
Lim, Seungji (Health Insurance Research Institute, National Health Insurance Service)
Publication Information
Health Policy and Management / v.30, no.4, 2020 , pp. 460-466 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study is to analyze whether there is a change in patterns of medical use among those likely to be converted their health insurance qualifications when the family support rule is alleviated. There is no empirical analysis that converting health insurance qualification will affect the increase in medical use. Methods: For analysis, data were extracted from the national health insurance eligibility and medical care database. To identify analysis targets similar to that of medical aids' characteristics among health insurance coverage, we compared income, property level, and medical use patterns through basic statistical analysis and used a difference-in-difference (DID) analysis to estimate the net effect of changes in medical use following the change of qualifications. Results: The main results are as follows. The results show that those who are under the 5% income group (1st income group) of health insurance coverage are the most similar to the medical aids group. DID analysis shows that changes in the medical use of people who maintain their national insurance qualification and who are not. As a results, the number of hospitalized days of converting group was reduced by 3.5 days while outpatient days were increased by 1.8 days. Conclusion: As a result, there was not much difference in the patterns of medical use for the under 5% income group who are likely to be eligible for expanded medical aids when the family support rule is alleviated. In addition, more than 30% of them are in arrears with their health insurance premiums, causing inconvenience in using medical services. These findings suggest the need of abolishing the criteria obligated to support family, and great efforts should be made to contribute to non-paid poor and remove their medical blind spot.
Keywords
Medical use; Family support rule; Medical aids; The insured; Health insurance coverage; Qualification;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 6  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Shin HW. A study on the evaluation of medical aid system and the establishment of basic plan. Sejong: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2017.
2 Joo JM, Kwon SM. Difference in outpatient medical expenditure and physician practice patterns between Medicaid and health insurance patients. Health Policy Manag 2009;19(3):125-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2009.19.3.125.   DOI
3 Shin YS, Shin HW, Hwang DK, Noh IC. Monitoring for the financial efficiency of medical aid. Sejong: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2006.
4 Shin YS. Direction to go for medical aid. Health Welf Policy Forum 2010;(167):28-38.
5 Yoon HS. Reforming the medical aid: preemptive system for improving poverty policy. KDI Focus 2011;(8):1-8.
6 Lee YJ. Differences of cancer patient's health care utilizations between medical aid program and national health insurance in the elderly. J Korea Contents Assoc 2011;11(5):270-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2011.11.5.270.   DOI
7 Shin HW, Yoon JH, Lee CS, Lim JW, Hwang SM. A study on the analysis and improvement of care behavior of medical aid patients. Sejong: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2012.
8 Lee HJ. Healthcare utilization and out-of-pocket spending of medical aids recipients in South Korea: a propensity score matching with National Health Insurance participants. Korean J Health Econ Policy 2016;22(2):22-49.
9 Park YH, Lee YJ. Qualitative analysis of medical usage patterns of medical aid patients. J Korea Contents Assoc 2017;17(9):39-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.09.039.   DOI
10 Dimick JB, Ryan AM. Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach. JAMA 2014;312(22):2401-2402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.16153.   DOI
11 Athey S, Imbens GW. Identification and inference in nonlinear difference-in-differences models. Econometrica 2006;74(2):431-497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00668.x.   DOI
12 Kim S, Kim MH, Kim CY, Seo SH, Yoo WS, Lee YS, Lee JY. A survey on the livelihood health insurance defaulters and the improvement of the system. Seoul: People's Health Institute; 2017.
13 Lee YJ. Medical care utilization between national health insurance and medical assistance in elderly patients. J Korea Contents Assoc 2017;17(4):585-595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.04.585.   DOI
14 Gertler PJ, Martinez S, Premand P, Rawlings LB, Vermeersch CM. Impact evaluation in practice. 2nd ed. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2016.
15 National Health Insurance Service. Health care and health insurance main statistics. Wonju: National Health Insurance Service; 2020.
16 Son BD. The family support obligation rule in the national basic livelihood security system: its limitation and way forward. Health Welf Policy Forum 2019;(275):32-45.
17 Song MK. Experiences of health care utilization among medical aid excessive users in Korea [dissertation]. Seoul: Hanyang University; 2015.
18 Kim ES, Nam JJ, Kim MY, Ko IS, Lee DM, Kim KS. A study on the long-term medical aid patients' healthcare utilization and improvement of medical healthcare. Seoul: University of Yonsei College of Nursing; 2017.