Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2019.29.2.112

Designing the Sickness Benefit Scheme in South Korea: Using the Implication from Schemes of Advanced Nations  

Jung, Hyun Woo (Department of Public Health Sciences, Korea University Graduate School)
Sohn, Minsung (Department of Health and Care Administration, The Cyber University of Korea)
Chung, Haejoo (Department of Public Health Sciences, Korea University Graduate School)
Publication Information
Health Policy and Management / v.29, no.2, 2019 , pp. 112-129 More about this Journal
Abstract
Currently, the South Korean Government does not provide sickness benefits from the National Health Insurance, which is different from most other Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries. The sickness benefit guarantees a part of lost income due to injuries or diseases. The purpose of this study is to propose a sickness benefit scheme for South Korea. To this end, we compare health care systems, sickness benefit schemes, and delivery systems of those in Germany, Japan, and Sweden, focusing on the seven categories: management authority, object, level of payment, duration of payment, qualification requirements, connection with paid sick leave of workplace, and financial resources, and as to delivery system, the six categories: the number of procedures, transferring document between institutions, whether or not utilizing electronic reporting system, applicant, and administrative convenience. Based on the implications derived from the case study, we propose the sickness benefit scheme and its delivery pathway and other details for South Korea. This study is first to propose the sickness benefit for health insurance in Korea with its level of details. More studies should follow with case studies of other countries, as well as productive debates to build a feasible and sustainable sickness benefit system in South Korea.
Keywords
Sickness benefit; Paid sick leave; Delivery system;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Yoon SG. Park Won Soon's another experiment of universal welfare "Seoul-type paid sick leave" to succeed? Newsis. 2018 Dec 7.
2 Choi HY. 'Half' industrial accident insurance 50 years ... "let's reform". Pressian. 2014 Jul 10.
3 Lee JW, Jeon GH, Jung JH, Lee JY, Baek IR, Ryu GC, et al. Social security system of major countries, Germany. Sejong: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2012.
4 Frick B, Malo MA. Labor market institutions and individual absenteeism in the European Union: the relative importance of sickness benefit systems and employment protection legislation. Ind Relat J Econ Soc 2008;47(4):505-529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1468-232x.2008.00533.x.
5 Voss M, Floderus B, Diderichsen F. Changes in sickness absenteeism following the introduction of a qualifying day for sickness benefit: findings from Sweden Post. Scand J Public Health 2001;29(3):166-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/140349401316983572.   DOI
6 Park YS. Statistics of wireless communication service subscriber line [Internet]. Gwacheon: Ministry of Science and ICT; 2018 [cited 2019 Mar 10]. Available from: https://www.msit.go.kr/web/msipContents/ contentsView.do?cateId=mssw67&artId=1387738.
7 Yon YJ. Seoul City introduces 'Seoul-type paid sick leave'. Labortoday. 2018 Apr 5.
8 Lee YJ. Seoul-type paid sick leave will be launched next year. Seoul Traffic Broadcasting System. 2018 Dec 18.
9 Suh MJ. Hwang Byeong-rae was re-elected as the head of the union chairman of the Korean National Health Insurance Service and said he would push for the introduction of the sickness benefit system. Medipana. 2018 Dec 25.
10 Chung HJ, Sohn MS, Kim JM, Kim JS, Jung HW, Che X, et al. Analyzing uncovered health care services of municipal hospital and establishing the health care coverage expansion strategy: focused on the Seoul-type paid sick leave system and innovative health security policy. Seoul: Seoul Health Foundation; 2018.
11 Choi ET. The minister of Health and Welfare agreed with the free vaccination for rotaviral infection, but he said it should be considered carefully, and so is the sickness benefit. Dailypharm. 2017 Jul 27.
12 Park EC. Moon Jae-in Government's plan for benefit expansion in National Health Insurance. Health Policy Manag 2017;27(3):191-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2017.27.3.191.   DOI
13 Do HR. Ahead of the presidential election, 57% of public opinion responded that the new government should make a decision on THAAD. Mediaus. 2017 Apr 18.
14 Kim CG. 56.5% of respondents said "THAAD deployment should be decided by the next government". OhmyNews. 2017 Apr 19.
15 Williams C, Lapeyre F. Dependent self-employment: trends, challenges and policy responses in the EU. Geneva: International Labour Office, Development and Investment Branch, Employment Policy Department; 2017.
16 Lee SY, Kim KT. Path to poverty of sick workers and fictional Korean social security. Korea Soc Policy Rev 2017;24(4):113-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17000/kspr.24.4.201712.113.   DOI
17 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Towards better social and employment security in Korea. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2018.
18 Raub A, Chung P, Batra P, Earle A, Bose B, Jou J, et al. Paid leave for personal illness: a detailed look at approaches across OECD countries. Los Angeles (CA): World Policy Analysis Center; 2018.
19 Choi ID, Kim JS. Introduction of sickness benefit program in health insurance: focus on the system design and estimating finance. Korean Soc Secur Assoc 2007;23(2):221-247.
20 Krankenkassen Zentrale. Sickness benefit: regular benefit of the statutory health insurance [Internet]. Berlin: Krankenkassen Zentrale; 2018 [cited 2018 Nov 23]. Available from: https://www.krankenkassenzentrale.de/wiki/krankengeld.
21 Shin KC. Policy measures for consolidating sickness benefits. Korean Soc Secur Assoc 2011;27(1):133-156.
22 Jung HJ. Including health insurance into stabilizing social insurance finances is an illegal attempt [Internet]. Seoul: People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy; 2016 [cited 2018 Nov 23]. Available from: https://www.peoplepower21.org/Welfare/1438066.
23 Moon SW, Choi EH, Kim SH, Lee JW. The current situation and implication of the paid sick leave system in major countries. Wonju: National Health Insurance Service; 2015.
24 Kim JS. A research on sickness benefit. Soc Secur Law Rev 2016;5(1):1-29.
25 Kim KT, Lee SY. Comparative analysis of sickness benefits abroad and proposal for its introduction in Korea. Soc Welf Policy 2018;45(1):148-177.   DOI
26 Bonoli G. Classifying welfare states: a two-dimension approach. J Soc Policy 1997;26(3):351-372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279497005059.   DOI
27 Kim SO, Kim YR, Chung HJ. Status of health security system in major countries and reform trends, Germany. Wonju: Health Insurance Policy Institute, National Health Insurance Service; 2014.
28 Lee YG. Reforms of the German Public Health Insurance during the last twenty years and their lessons for the Korean National Health Insurance. Health Soc Welf Rev 2009;29(2):186-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2009.29.2.186.   DOI
29 European Commission. Your social security rights in Germany. Brussels: European Commission; 2018.
30 Jung JW. A comparative study on the income security system of the sick or injured workers. J Labor Policy 2009;9(4):225-259.
31 Kim KH. A comparative study on the health insurance system of Korea, Japan and Taiwan. Healthc Policy Forum 2017;14(4):85-91.
32 Lim HJ. Relation between central and local government in Japan after decentralization: case study on welfare policies in the Shiga prefecture. Korean J Japanol 2015;104:279-300. DOI: https://doi. org/10.15532/kaja.2015.08.104.279.   DOI
33 Japan Health Insurance Association. When I was absent from work due to illness or injury [Internet]. Tokyo: Japan Health Insurance Association; 2016 [cited 2018 Nov 24]. Available from: https://www.kyoukaikenpo.or.jp/.
34 Kim DH, Gwon JH, Yoo AJ, Moon YP. Status of health security system in major countries and reform trends, Japan. Wonju: Health Insurance Policy Institute, National Health Insurance Service; 2014.
35 Social Security Administration. Social security programs throughout the world: Asia and the Pacific, 2016 [Internet]. Woodlawn (MD): Social Security Administration; 2017 [cited 2019 Mar 10]. Available from: https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/progdesc/ssptw/2016-2017/asia/index.html.
36 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Public expenditure on disability and sickness cash benefits in % GDP [Internet]. Paris: OECD Statistics; 2017 [cited 2019 Mar 10]. Available from: http://stats.oecd.org/.
37 Arvidsson N, Hedman J, Segendorf B. Cashless society: when will merchants stop accepting cash in Sweden: a research model. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52764-2_8.
38 Kim YM. A study on the German Health Insurance System and institutional changes after reunification. Korean Soc Secur Law Assoc 2017;6(2):67-102.
39 Schon BB. Sick benefit: this will give you money if you are sick longer. FINANZTIP. 2018 Mar 8.
40 Social Insurance Collection Integration Promotion Planning Team. Swedish social insurance system [Internet]. Seoul: Korea Employers Federation; 2008 [cited 2018 Nov 23]. Available from: http://www.kefplaza.com/.
41 Swedish Social Insurance Agency. Sickness benefit for employees [Internet]. Stockholm: Swedish Social Insurance Agency [cited 2018 Nov 26]. Available from: https://www.forsakringskassan.se/privatpers/sjuk/anstalld/sjukpenning.
42 Yun YD, Lee SH, Ghang HR, Gwak DS. Status of health security system in major countries and reform trends, Sweden. Wonju: Health Insurance Policy Institute, National Health Insurance Service; 2014.
43 Social Security Administration. Social security programs throughout the world: Europe, 2018 [Internet]. Woodlawn (MD): Social Security Administration; 2018 [cited 2019 Mar 10]. Available from: https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/progdesc/ssptw/2018-2019/europe/index.html.
44 Soderberg E, Mussener U. Entitlement to sickness benefits in Sweden: the social insurance officers experiences. Environ Health Insights 2008;2:13-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4137/ehi.s858.
45 Jung KH, Kim YH, Lee JH. Social security system of major countries, Sweden. Sejong: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2012.
46 Dagens Arena. Employees at forsakringskassan: only statistics that count. Stockholm: Dagens Arena; 2013.
47 Andren D. 'Never on a sunday': economic incentives and short-term sick leave in Sweden. Appl Econ 2005;37(3):327-338. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1080/0003684042000295287.   DOI
48 Park JS, Lee JW. Burden of proof in industrial accident compensation insurance actions. Korea Univ Law Rev 2011;63:37-72.