Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2014.24.2.172

Trends and Factors Affecting Participation Rate in Korean National Health Screening among People with Disabilities  

Yun, Ji Eun (Division for Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency)
Lim, Borami (Department of Rehabilitation Standard & Policy, Korea National Rehabilitation Research Institute)
Ho, Seung Hee (Department of Rehabilitation Standard & Policy, Korea National Rehabilitation Research Institute)
Publication Information
Health Policy and Management / v.24, no.2, 2014 , pp. 172-180 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: People with disabilities have higher prevalence rates and earlier onset of chronic disease than the non-disabled; therefore, their participation in health screening is important. This study evaluates the participation rate and trends in health screening of people with disabilities, and examines the association between their participation rate and disability characteristics, and socioeconomic status. Methods: Data on disability-related characteristics were collected from the National Disability Registry, and participants' corresponding health examination data were taken from the Korean National Health Insurance Corporation between 2002 and 2011. A total of 873,819 participants aged ${\geq}20$ years were analyzed in this study. Results: The rate of participation of people with disabilities in health screening has increased each year, but their participation rate is lower than that of the total population. The participation rate was lower in females than in males; the elderly group than in the younger group; those who live in city areas than rural areas; self-employed for health insurance than employees; those with an internal organ disability than those with an external physical disability; those with a severe disability than those with a mild disability; and those with a short-term disability than for those with a long-term disability. Conclusion: The factors associated with participation rate are age, sex, socioeconomic status, and disability characteristics. These findings indicate that health check-ups of people with disabilities should be promoted using an approach that takes into account the large individual differences in socioeconomic status and disability characteristics in this population.
Keywords
Health screening; Disabled persons; Participation rate; National health programs;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 7  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Lemon S, Zapka J, Puleo E, Luckmann R, Chasan-Taber L. Colorectal cancer screening participation: comparisons with mammography and prostate-specific antigen screening. Am J Public Health 2001;91(8):1264-1272.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Han MY, Chung CW. Breast cancer screening behaviors in working women. Korean J Women Health Nurs 2006;12(4):363-370.   과학기술학회마을
3 Kuroishi T, Hirose K, Suzuki T, Tominaga S. Effectiveness of mass screening for breast cancer in Japan. Breast Cancer 2000;7(1):1-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Kmietowicz Z. WHO insists screening can cut breast cancer rates. BMJ 2002;324(7339):695.   DOI
5 Sarkeala T. Performance and effectiveness of organised breast cancer screening in Finland. Acta Oncol 2008;47(8):1618.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Yeo J, Jeong H. Determinants of health screening and its effects on health behaviors. Korean J Health Policy Admin 2012;22(1):49-64.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Kang S, You CH, Kwon YD. The determinants of the use of opportunistic screening programs in Korea. J Prev Med Public Health 2009;42(3):177-182.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Pharr JR, Bungum T. Health disparities experienced by people with disabilities in the United States: a Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System study. Glob J Health Sci 2012;4(6):99-108.   DOI
9 Liu SY, Clark MA. Breast and cervical cancer screening practices among disabled women aged 40-75: does quality of the experience matter? J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2008;17(8):1321-1329.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Allerton L, Emerson E. British adults with chronic health conditions or impairments face significant barriers to accessing health services. Public Health 2012;126(11):920-927.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Lee H, Ho S, Kang HG, Lee SY. A study on disability database and applicable system to provide continuous and comprehensive rehabilitation service. Korean J Health Policy Admin 2011;21(2):279-308.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Soskolne V, Marie S, Manor O. Beliefs, recommendations and intentions are important explanatory factors of mammography screening behavior among Muslim Arab women in Israel. Health Educ Res 2007;22(5):665-676.   DOI
13 Sutton S, Bickler G, Sancho-Aldridge J, Saidi G. Prospective study of predictors of attendance for breast screening in inner London. J Epidemiol Community Health 1994;48(1):65-73.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Clark MA, Rakowski W, Ehrich B, Rimer BK, Velicer WF, Dube CE, et al. The effect of a stage-matched and tailored intervention on repeat mammography(1). Am J Prev Med 2002;22(1):1-7.   DOI
15 Reichard A, Stolzle H, Fox MH. Health disparities among adults with physical disabilities or cognitive limitations compared to individuals with no disabilities in the United States. Disabil Health J 2011;4(2):59-67.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Armour BS, Thierry JM, Wolf LA. State-level differences in breast and cervical cancer screening by disability status: United States, 2008. Womens Health Issues 2009;19(6):406-414.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Chun SM, Hwang B, Park JH, Shin HI. Implications of sociodemographic factors and health examination rate for people with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012;93(7):1161-1166.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Champion V, Maraj M, Hui S, Perkins AJ, Tierney W, Menon U, et al. Comparison of tailored interventions to increase mammography screening in nonadherent older women. Prev Med 2003;36(2):150-158.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Ministry of Health and Welfare. National survey on persons with disabilities 2008. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2009.
20 Krause JS, Saunders LL. Health, secondary conditions, and life expectancy after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92(11):1770-1775.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 World Health Organization. World report on disability. Geneva: World Health Organization: 2011.
22 Ministry of Health and Welfare. Ministry of Health and Welfare statistical year book 2013. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2013.
23 Yoo S, Lee J, Yoon S, An H. A study of factors related with a periodic general health examination. J Korean Data Anal Soc 2008;10(1):119-131.
24 Park SH, Kim CH, Kim EK. Factors associated with cancer screening rates of manufacturing workers. Korean J Occup Health Nurs 2013;22(3): 179-190.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Choi JS, Park JY, Han CH. The behavioral and educational factors affecting the breast self-examination and breast cancer screening. Korean J Health Educ Promot 2001;18(1):61-78.   과학기술학회마을
26 Kye SY, Park KH, Choi KS, Moon IO, Yun YO, Lim MK. Predictors of intention to undergo mammography among underutilizers. Korean J Health Educ Promot 2009;26(2):75-86.   과학기술학회마을
27 James AS, Campbell MK, Hudson MA. Perceived barriers and benefits to colon cancer screening among African Americans in North Carolina: how does perception relate to screening behavior? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11(6):529-534.
28 Honda K, Kagawa-Singer M. Cognitive mediators linking social support networks to colorectal cancer screening adherence. J Behav Med 2006; 29(5):449-460.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Tolma EL, Reininger BM, Evans A, Ureda J. Examining the theory of planned behavior and the construct of self-efficacy to predict mammography intention. Health Educ Behav 2006;33(2):233-251.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Menon U, Champion V, Monahan PO, Daggy J, Hui S, Skinner CS. Health belief model variables as predictors of progression in stage of mammography adoption. Am J Health Promot 2007;21(4):255-261.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Ministry of Health and Welfare. National survey on persons with disabilities 2011. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2012.
32 Russell KM, Monahan P, Wagle A, Champion V. Differences in health and cultural beliefs by stage of mammography screening adoption in African American women. Cancer 2007;109(2 Suppl):386-395.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Lee AK, Lee S, Jeong HJ, Han JT, Kwon HY, Park H, Kim S. Cost-effectiveness analysis of type 2 diabetes mellitus screening program of national health insurance. Health Soc Sci 2009;26(12):41-65.
34 Oh JS. The study on the influential factors on the health service utilization by chronic patients with disabilities: focused on the self-employed of national health insurance (master's thesis). Seoul: Yonsei University; 2005.
35 DeJong G. Primary care for persons with disabilities: an overview of the problem. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1997;76(3 Suppl):S2-S8.
36 Kroll T, Neri MT, Ho PS. Secondary conditions in spinal cord injury: results from a prospective survey. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29(15):1229-1237.   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Janz NK, Wren PA, Schottenfeld D, Guire KE. Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and behavior: a population-based study. Prev Med 2003; 37(6 Pt 1):627-634.   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Yoon YD, Seo SR, Kim HC. Evaluation of general health screening project. Seoul: National Health Insurance Policy Research Institute, National Health Insurance Corporation; 2010.
39 Puliti D, Miccinesi G, Collina N, De Lisi V, Federico M, Ferretti S, et al. Effectiveness of service screening: a case-control study to assess breast cancer mortality reduction. Br J Cancer 2008;99(3):423-427.   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Park JH, Lee JS, Lee JY, Hong JY, Kim SY, Kim SO, et al. Factors affecting national health insurance mass screening participation in the disabled. J Prev Med Public Health 2006;39(6):511-519.   과학기술학회마을