1 |
Stausberg J, Kiefer E. Homogeneity of the German diagnosis-related groups. Health Serv Manage Res 2010;23(4):154-159.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Wynn BO. Understanding Medicare severity-DRGs. Santa Monica (CA): RAND; 2007.
|
3 |
Wynn BO, Beckett MK, Hilborne LH, Scott M, Bahney B. Evaluation of severity-adjusted DRG systems. Santa Monica (CA): RAND; 2007.
|
4 |
Palmer GR, Reid B, Aisbett C, Fields S, Kearns D, Fetter R. Evaluating the performance of the Australian national diagnosis related groups. Sydney: Centre for Hospital Management and Information Systems Research, University of New South Wales; 1997.
|
5 |
Palmer G, Reid B. Evaluation of the performance of diagnosis-related groups and similar casemix systems: methodological issues. Health Serv Manage Res 2001;14(2):71-81.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Park HY, Park KD, Shin YS. On feasibility of ambulatory KDRGs for the classification of health insurance claims. Korean J Health Policy Admin 2003; 13(1):98-115.
과학기술학회마을
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Reid B, Palmer G, Aisbett C. The performance of Australian DRGs. Aust Health Rev 2000;23(2):20-31.
DOI
|
8 |
Rosenberg MA, Browne MJ. The impact of the inpatient prospective payment system and diagnosis-related groups: a survey of the literature. N Am Actuar J 2001;5(4):84-94.
DOI
|
9 |
Shin YS, Lee YS, Park HY, Yeom YK. Development and evaluation of Korean diagnosis related groups: medical service utilization of inpatients. Korean J Prev Med 1993;26(2):293-309.
과학기술학회마을
|
10 |
Lorenzoni L, Pearson M. Description of alternative approaches to measure and place a value on hospital products in seven OECD countries. OECD Health Working Papers, No. 56. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Publishing; 2011.
|
11 |
Mayes R. The origins, development, and passage of Medicare's revolutionary prospective payment system. J Hist Med Allied Sci 2007;62(1):21-55.
DOI
|
12 |
Metral P, Ducret N, Patris A, Steunou P. Improving case mix for description and funding in rehabilitation in France: additive model is better than tree-classification. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8(1):A2.
DOI
|
13 |
National Casemix and Classification Centre. AR-DRG definitions manuals [Internet]. Sydney: National Casemix and Classification Centre; 2011 [cited 2012 Jan 9]. Available from: http://nccc.uow.edu.au/ardrg/definitionsmanuals/index.html.
|
14 |
National Health Service Information Centre. HRG4 companion [Internet]. London: National Health Service Information Centre; 2011 [cited 2012 Feb 6]. Available from: http://www.ic.nhs.uk/webfiles/Services/casemix/HRG4%20Companion%20v1.1.pdf.
|
15 |
Hsia DC, Krushat WM, Fagan AB, Tebbutt JA, Kusserow RP. Accuracy of diagnostic coding for medicare patients under the prospective-payment system. N Engl J Med 1988;318(6):352-355.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Fischer W, Blanco J, Butt M, Hund M, Boldt C. Leistungsorientiertes tarifmodell rehabilitation (LTR). Neurol Rehabil 2010;3(16):1-18.
|
17 |
Frank RG, Lave JR. The psychiatric DRGs. Are they different? Med Care 1985;23(10):1148-1155.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Hsia DC, Ahern CA, Ritchie BP, Moscoe LM, Krushat WM. Medicare reimbursement accuracy under the prospective payment system, 1985 to 1988. JAMA 1992;268(7):896-899.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Kang GW, Park H, Shin YS. Refinement and evaluation of Korean diagnosis related groups. Korean J Health Policy Admin 2004;14(1):121-147.
과학기술학회마을
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Kawabuchi K. DRG/PPS and hospital management. Lee JH, translator. Gwangju: Korea Medical Consulting; 2000.
|
21 |
Kim YJ. The adequacy on DRG classification system in obstetric group [master's thesis]. Seoul: Yonsei University; 2003.
|
22 |
Lee SH. Problems of introduction of DRG payment in kidney disease and improvement plan. Seoul: Ewha Womans University; 2010.
|
23 |
Averill RF, Muldoon JH, Vertrees JC, Goldfield NI, Mullin RL, Fineran EC, et al. The evolution of casemix measurement using diagnosis related groups (DRGs). Wallingford (CN): 3M Health Information Systems; 1999.
|
24 |
Busse R, Geissler A, Quentin W, Wiley M. Diagnosis-related groups in Europe. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2011.
|
25 |
Casas M. Issues for comparability of DRG statistics in Europe: results from EURODRG. Health Policy 1991;17(2):121-132.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Fetter RB, Shin Y, Freeman JL, Averill RF, Thompson JD. Case mix definition by diagnosis-related groups. Med Care 1980;18(2 Suppl):iii, 1-53.
|
27 |
Casemix Design Authority. The casemix design framework 2009: performance measurement techniques. London: National Health Service Information Centre; 2009.
|
28 |
Choi MA. A study of KDRG classification system and factors related to length of stay using data mining methodology: for the case of cesarean section [master's thesis]. Seoul: Yonsei University; 2001.
|
29 |
Chae Y. Comparison of DRG classification systems in a number of countries [master's thesis]. Seoul: Ewha Womans University; 2001.
|
30 |
Averill RF, Goldfield NI, Hughes JS, Bonazelli J, Mccullough EC, Mullin R, et al. 3M APR DRG classification system version 29.0. definitions manual. Wallingford (CN): 3M Health Information Systems; 2011.
|