Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2005.15.1.078

Sticky Cost Behavior Analysis of General Hospitals in Korea  

Yang Dong Hyun (Department of Health services Administration Graduate School of Public Health, Inje Univ)
Lee Youn Tae (Korea Health Industry Development Institute)
Park Kwang Hoon (The University of Seoul)
Publication Information
Health Policy and Management / v.15, no.1, 2005 , pp. 78-96 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this empirical study is to investigate whether costs are 'sticky' -that is, whether costs increase more when revenues rises than they decrease when revenues falls by an equivalent amount by using the financial data fromf korean general hospital Financial data used in this study were obtained from the Database of Korean Health Industry Development Institute and analyzed using multiple regression model in dummy variables. The main results of this study are as follows: First, we found, for 69 Korean general hospitals for 3 years(2000~2002), that total hospital costs, hospital labor costs, hospital administrative costs were sticky, these costs provided strong support for the sticky costs hypothesis 1, but hospital material costs were shown to be proportional to sales revenues. Second, this results provided strong support for the hypotheses that the' degree of stickiness was lower in sales revenues declining that were preceded by revenue-declining periods (hypothesis 2-1), and that stickiness was less pronounced in a second successive year of revenue decline(hypothesis 2-2). Third, this results provided strong support for the hypothesis(hypothesis 3) that stickiness was greater hospitals that employ relatively more people to support their sales revenues(hypothesis 4) that stickiness was greater for hospital that used relatively more assets to support their sales revenues. After all, a managerial implication of this study was that sticky cost, for the general hospital, could be recognized and controlled.
Keywords
Sticky Cost Behavior; Hospital Costs; Labor Costs; Administrative Costs;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 김성기, 안숙찬. 원가관리 회계. 서울: 다산출판사, 1995
2 김중식. 현대관리회계. 서울: 형설출판사; 1998
3 안태식.이석영.정형록, 한국제조기업의 비대칭적 원가행태, 경영학연구, 2004 :33-3
4 Noreen E, Soderastrom N. Are overhead costs Strictly Proportional to Activity? Evidence from hospital departments. Journal of Accounting and Economics 1994:255-278
5 Noreen E, Soderastrom N. The Accuracy of Proportional Cost Models: Evidence from Hospital Service Departments. Review of Accounting Studies 1997:2:89-114   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Raffish N, Turney PB. The CAM-I glossary of activity-based management (2nd ed): 1991
7 Rotch W. Activity-based costing in services industries: Emerging practices in cost management. Edited by Brinker BJ, Warren, Gorgam & Lamont, 1991, p.F2-5
8 Shank JK, Govindarajan V. Strategic cost management and the value chain. Journal of Cost Management, 1992; Winter: 5-21
9 Anderson, M. C. Banker, R. D. and S,Janakiraman, Are selling, general and administrative costs 'sticky'? Journal of Accounting Research 2003:41:47-63   DOI   ScienceOn
10 한국보건산업진흥원, 병원경영분석, 문영사, 2000-2002
11 Anderson SW. Measuring the impact of Product mix heterogeneity on manufacturing Overhead Cost. The Accounting Review 1995;70(3):363-387
12 Cooper R, Kaplan RS. The Design of Cost Management System: Text, Cases, and Reading .Upper Saddle River,NJ:Prentice Hall 1998
13 Noreen,E, Conditions Under Which Activity-Based Cost System Provide Relevant Costs. Journal of Management Accounting Research 1991:3:159-168