Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2002.12.2.092

Self-regulation of a Health Information On the Internet  

정영철 (한국보건사회연구원)
이견직 (협성대학교 보건관리학과)
Publication Information
Health Policy and Management / v.12, no.2, 2002 , pp. 92-114 More about this Journal
Abstract
While making a vigorous discussion about self-regulation for exponential growth of harmful health information on the Internet, many countries lave made various efforts to select and circulate high quality health information on the Internet. The purpose of this study Is to review the serf-regulation methods of health information on the Internet and to suggest quality control methods of health information on the Internet suitable for Korea. Self-regulation methods of the health information on the Internet include ‘content rating system(or content selection system)’, ‘codes of conduct or guideline’, ‘internet hot-line’, ‘education for information providers and consumers’. Any self-regulation method should be used with other methods. We can regulate health information on the Internet effectively by using both self-regulation methods and compulsive methods such as law. Also information providers, information consumers, specialists, consumer representatives, scholars, governments officers should take part in doing these efforts and make concern.
Keywords
internet heath information; self-regulation; content selection; health information guideline; internet hot-line;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 정보통신부. 해외 민간분야의 인터넷 정보내용 감시망 실태조사. 2001.2
2 보건복지부, 한국보건사회연구원. 보건복지지식정보화 비전수립연구. 2001
3 황성기, 최승훈. 인터넷컨텐츠 자율규제의 개념과 장치들. 정보와 사회, 한국정보사회학회, 2001.3
4 정보통신윤리위원회. 자율규제와 인터넷 핫라인(2). 정보통신윤리 2001; 8: 32-33
5 신정하, 성홍관, 김철환, 고재성, 우광훈. 간염관련정보 분석을 통해 국내 인터넷 의료정보의 적절성 평가. 대한의료정보학회지 2000; 6(3): 73-88
6 Eygenbach G. MedCERTAIN Project 1st Progress Report. 2001
7 유승호. 사이버커뮤니케이션론: 공동체, 지역, 그리고 윤리. 녹두, 2000
8 정영철, 박현애. 인터넷상의 건강정보 평가체계 개발. 대한의료정보학회지 2000; 6(1): 53-66
9 Waltennan J, Machill M. Protecting our children on the internet: Towards a new culture of responsibility. Bertelsmann Foundation Publishers, Gutersloh, 2000
10 Iadad AR, et al. Rating health information on the internet-navigating to knowledge or to babel? Journal of the American Medical Association 1998: 279; 611-614
11 Pew Internet & American Life Project. The online health care revolution. 2000.11
12 손애리. 건강관련 인터넷사이트 평가를 위한 기준. 한국보건통계학회지 2000; 25(2): 97-107
13 강남미, 김진, 탁계래, 현태선. 인터넷상의 국내 건강정보사이트의 평가기준. 대한의료정보학회지 1999; 5(1): 119-124
14 Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health. Wired for health and well-being: the emergence of interactive health communication. US Department of Health and Human Services, US Government Printing Office, 1999
15 정보통신윤리위원회. SafeSurfing 보고서. 2001.3
16 Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the internet: caveant lector et viewor: Let the reader and viewer bewareleditorialJ. Journal of the American Medical Association 1997: 277: 1244-1245
17 한국인터넷정보센터. 인터넷 이용자수 및 이용형태에 관한 설문조사 결과 보고서. 2002.1