Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5806/AST.2020.33.2.108

Latent fingerprint development from rubber gloves using MMD I (Multimetal deposition I)  

An, Jaeyoung (Graduate School of Forensic Science, Soonchunhyang UniUK Home Office Grading Systemversity)
Kim, Heesu (Graduate School of Forensic Science, Soonchunhyang UniUK Home Office Grading Systemversity)
Oh, Jungmin (Graduate School of Forensic Science, Soonchunhyang UniUK Home Office Grading Systemversity)
Han, Sooyong (Graduate School of Forensic Science, Soonchunhyang UniUK Home Office Grading Systemversity)
Yu, Jeseol (Graduate School of Forensic Science, Soonchunhyang UniUK Home Office Grading Systemversity)
Publication Information
Analytical Science and Technology / v.33, no.2, 2020 , pp. 108-114 More about this Journal
Abstract
Gloves are very important evidence at a crime scene; specifically, rubber gloves can be found easily at homes. Therefore, crime scene investigators attempt to develop fingerprints inside the rubber gloves that are discovered, for identifying unknown suspects. This study compared the effectiveness of three different methods that are used for developing latent prints on gloves with aging time. These were the powder, cyanoacrylate fuming, and multi-metal deposition I methods. The powder method achieved good results for 1-3 days of aged prints, and the cyanoacrylate fuming method worked well on 2-week-old prints. In comparison, multi-metal deposition I method developed good quality fingerprints for 6 weeks of aging time.
Keywords
Colloidal gold; Multimetal deposition I; rubber glove; Fingerprint;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 S. Bleay, V. Sears, R. Downham, H. Bandey, A. Gibson, V. Bowman, L. Fitzgerald, T. Ciuksza, J. Ramadani and C. Selway, 'Fingerprint Source Book v2.0 (second edition)', Home Office, London, 364-377, 2017.
2 G. Kausche and H. Rusha, Kolloid Z., 89(1) 21-26 (1939).   DOI
3 G. Frens, Nat. Phys. Sci., 241(105) 20-22 (1973).   DOI
4 G. Saunders, 'Multimetal deposition technique for latent fingerprint visualization', Final Progress Report to the U.S. Secret Service, Washington, D.C., 1989.
5 N. Jones, C. Lennard, M. Stoilovic and C. Roux, J. Forensic Ident., 53(4) 444-488 (2003).
6 N. Jones, 'Metal deposition techniques for the detection and enhancement of latent fingerprints on semi-porous surfaces' PhD Dissertation, University of Technology Sydney, Australia, 2002.
7 H. I. Lee, 'New Method for Developing Latent fingerprints', ID TECH, Korea, 2002.
8 B. Fisher and D. Fisher, 'Technique of Crime Scene Investigation', 8th Ed., CRC Press, Florida, 2004.
9 R. Ramotowski, 'Lee and Gaensslen's Advances in Fingerprint Technology', 3rd Ed., CRC Press, Florida, 2012.
10 J. Hunter, Int. J. Fingerprint Soc., 23(89), 91-93 (1997).
11 D. Rinhehart, J. Forensic Ident., 50(5), 443-446 (2000).
12 K. Sharma, G. Kannikanti, T. Baggi and J. Vaidya, Methods Appl. Fluoresc., 6(3) (2018).
13 A. Badiye and N. Kapoor, Egypt. J. Forensic Sci., 5(4) 166-173 (2015).   DOI
14 J. H. Park, J. Y. Ki and S. J. Kim, Kor. Pol. J. CSI, 1(1) 49-58 (2016).