Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5806/AST.2019.32.5.185

Cyclodextrins' effect on the enatioseparation of some PPIs and capillary electrophoresis method development for determining rabeprazole enantiomers  

Choi, Yusung (College of Pharmacy, Kangwon National University)
Pham, Thuy-Vy (College of Pharmacy, Kangwon National University)
Mai, Xuan-Lan (College of Pharmacy, Kangwon National University)
Truong, Quoc-Ky (Pharmacy Faculty, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine)
Le, Thi-Anh-Tuyet (College of Pharmacy, Kangwon National University)
Nguyen, Thi-Ngoc-Van (Pharmacy Faculty, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy)
Lee, Gunhee (College of Pharmacy, Kangwon National University)
Kang, Jong-Seong (College of Pharmacy, Chungnam National University)
Mar, Woongchon (College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University)
Kim, Kyeong Ho (College of Pharmacy, Kangwon National University)
Publication Information
Analytical Science and Technology / v.32, no.5, 2019 , pp. 185-195 More about this Journal
Abstract
Over the past decades, chiral switch of the proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has been received widespread attention in therapeutic advantages as well as pharmaceutical analysis. In present study, the influence of cyclodextrins (CDs) on the chiral separation of four common PPIs (lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole) was investigated. The results demonstrated that capillary electrophoresis (CE) with dual CDs as a chiral selector system is a possible and promising method for the enantioseparation of these PPIs. Rabeprazole, which is the most challenging and acid-labile candidate among four PPIs, was selected for further development of the technique. To optimize CE condition, the effects of capillary parameters and background electrolytes on the enantioseparation were investigated. Finally, the best chiral separation was acheived by using sulfobutyl ether-${\beta}$-CD, and ${\gamma}$-CD as dual chiral selectors. The developed CE method not only provided the effective chiral separation but also showed the good stability of rabeprazole. The proposed method was successfully validated according to the International Conference on Harmonization guideline and effectively applied to determine rabeprazole enantiomers in commercial rabeprazole tablets, with recoveries ranging from 97.17 % to 103.29 % of the label content.
Keywords
Capillary electrophoresis; Enatioseparation; Cyclodextrins; Rabeprazole enantiomers; Proton pump inhibitors;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 M. E. El-kommos, P. Y. Khashaba, H. R. H. Ali, and M. M. El-wekil, J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol., 38(18), 1639-1659 (2015).   DOI
2 S. L. Bodhankar, B. B. Jain, B. P. Ahire, R. B. Daude, and P. P. Shitole, Indian J. Pharmaco., 38(5), 357-358 (2006).   DOI
3 V. Pai and N. Pai, World J Gastroenterol., 13(30), 4100-4102 (2007).   DOI
4 Q. Zhou, X. F. Yan, W. S. Pan, and S. Zeng, World J. Gastroenterol., 14(16), 2617-2619 (2008).   DOI
5 K. R. Lee, N. V. T. Nguyen, Y. J. Lee, S. Choi, J. S. Kang, and K. H. Kim, Arch Pharm. Res., 38(5), 826- 833 (2015).   DOI
6 M. Fillet, B. Chankvetadze, J. Crommen, and G. Blaschke, Electrophoresis, 20(13), 2691-2697 (1999).   DOI
7 J. M. Saz and M. L. Marina, J. Chromatogr. A, 1467, 79-94 (2016).   DOI
8 N. Cao, L. Liu, Y. B. Hao, L. L. Sun, Q. G. Zou, X. L. Ma, and K. H. Xiong, Anal. Methods, 8, 1405-1414 (2016).   DOI
9 L. N. Chennuru, T. Choppari, S. Duvvuri, and P. K. Dubey, J. Sep. Sci., 36(18), 3004-3010 (2013).   DOI
10 M. R. Kim, S. K. Yu, Q. K. Truong, X. L. Mai, H. K. Chung, J. S. Kang, and K. H. Kim, Arch. Pharm. Res., 40(3), 373-381 (2017).   DOI
11 R. N. Rao, A. N. Raju, and D. Nagaraju, Talanta, 70(4), 805-810 (2006).   DOI
12 R. Cirilli, R. Ferretti, B. Gallinella, E. De Santis, L. Zanitti, and F. L. Torre, J. Chromatogr. A, 1177(1), 105-113 (2008).   DOI
13 H. K. Chung, Q. K. Truong, X. L. Mai, Y. S. Choi, J. S. Kang, W. C. Mar, and K. H. Kim, Arch. Pharm. Res., 40(8), 962-971 (2017).   DOI
14 P. Estevez, S. Flor, O. Boscolo, V. Tripodi, and S. Lucangioli, Electrophoresis, 35(6), 804-810 (2014).   DOI
15 G. Hancu, L. A. Papp, and A. Rusu, Chromatographia, 78(3-4), 279-284 (2015).   DOI
16 J. J. B. Nevado, G. C. Penalvol, and R. M. R. Dorado, Anal. Chim. Acta., 533(2), 127-133 (2005).   DOI
17 J. J. B. Nevado, G. C. Penalvo1, J. C. J. Sanchez, M. C. Mochon, R. M. R. Dorado, and M. V. Navarro, Electrophoresis, 30(16), 2940-2946 (2009).   DOI
18 L. A. Papp, G. Hancu, A. Gyeresi, H. Kelemen, Z. I. Szabo, B. Noszal, P. Dubsky, and G. Toth, Electrophoresis, 1-7 (2019).
19 Z. Ma, L. Zhang, L. Jin, P. Ji, and X. Guo, Biomed. Chromatogr., 24(12), 1332-1337 (2010).   DOI
20 H. Fabre and K. D. Altria, LC GC Eur., 14(5), 1-5 (2011).
21 K. D. Altria, LC GC Eur., 15(9), 588-594 (2002).
22 J. M. Shin and Na, Kim, J. Neurogastroenterol. Motil., 19(1), 25-35 (2013).   DOI
23 B. Chankvetadze, 'Capillary electrophoresis in chiral analysis', Wiley, Chinchester, 1997.
24 R. Buchireddy, K. Mukkanti, P. Srinivasulu, and K. S. V. Srinivas, Chromatographia, 68(3-4), 275-280 (2008).   DOI
25 A. Guttman and N. Cooke, J. Chromatogr. A, 680(1), 157-162 (1994).   DOI
26 S. G. Penn, D. M. Goodall, and J. S. Loran, J. Chromatogr. A, 636(1), 149-152 (1993).   DOI
27 A. Shibukawa, D. K. Lloyd, and I. W. Wainer, Chromatographia, 35(7-8), 419-429 (1993).   DOI