Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5806/AST.2019.32.2.56

Rapid determination and quantification of hair-growth compounds in adulterated products by ultra HPLC coupled to quadrupole-orbitrap MS  

Lee, Ji Hyun (Division of Advanced Analysis, Toxicological Evaluation and Research Department, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety)
Park, Han Na (Division of Advanced Analysis, Toxicological Evaluation and Research Department, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety)
Kang, Gihaeng (Division of Advanced Analysis, Toxicological Evaluation and Research Department, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety)
Kim, Nam Sook (Division of Advanced Analysis, Toxicological Evaluation and Research Department, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety)
Park, Seongsoo (Division of Advanced Analysis, Toxicological Evaluation and Research Department, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety)
Lee, Jongkook (College of Pharmacy, Kangwon National University)
Kang, Hoil (Division of Advanced Analysis, Toxicological Evaluation and Research Department, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety)
Publication Information
Analytical Science and Technology / v.32, no.2, 2019 , pp. 56-64 More about this Journal
Abstract
Recently, a number of adulterated products, which are advertised as hair-growth enhancer have been emerged among those who suffer hair loss disease. For continuous control of illegal products, in this study, a rapid and sensitive method for simultaneous screening of 12 compounds that enhance hair-growth was established to protect public health by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometry (UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap-MS). Fragmentation pathways of them were proposed based on $MS^2$ spectral data obtained using the established method. In this analysis, the LODs and LOQs ranged from 0.05 to 50 ng/mL and from 0.17 to 167 ng/mL, respectively. The square of the linear correlation coefficient ($R^2$) was determined as more than 0.995. The intra- and inter-assay accuracies were respective 88-112 % and 88-115 %. Their precision values were measured within 5 % (intra-day) and 10 % (inter-day). Mean recoveries of target compounds in adulterated products ranged from 84 to 115%. The relative standard deviation of stability was less than 12 % at $4^{\circ}C$ for 48 h. The method was employed to screen 14 dietary supplements advertised to be effective for the treatment of hair loss. Some of the products (~21 %) were proven to contain synthetic drugs that promote hair growth such as triaminodil, minoxidil, and finasteride.
Keywords
hair loss; adulterants; UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap-MS; screening; validation; fragmentation pathway;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 B. Patel, M. A. M. Velasco, F. T. Gutierrez, and D. Khesin, J. Bioequiv. Bioavail., 3, 1-9 (2017).
2 S. Sheikh, A. Ahmad, S. M. Ali, M. U. Ahmad, M. Paithankar, D. Saptarshi, P. Kale, K. Maheshwari, H. V. Barkate, H. L. Pathak, M. Mushtaq, and I. Ahmad, J Clin. Exp. Dermatol., 6, 253 (2015).
3 A. Adil and M. Godwin, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 77, 136-141 (2017).   DOI
4 S. Inui and S. Itami, Exp Dermatol, 22, 168-171 (2013).   DOI
5 E. Marchei, D. D. Orsi, C. Guarino, M. C. Rotolo, S. Graziano, and S. Pichini, Cosmetics, 12, 1-8 (2016).
6 P. M. Krishna, B. T. Rao, M. B. Raju, C. N. Rao, R. K. Kumar, and P. Venkateswarlu, J. Pharm. Res., 4, 2381-2383 (2011).
7 R. Yuan and Y. Lin, Pharmacol Ther., 86, 191-198 (2000).   DOI
8 J. Wang, B. Chen, and S. Yao, Food Addit. Contam A, 25, 822-830 (2008).   DOI
9 R. D. Sinclair and R. D. Dawber, Clin. Dermatol., 19, 167-178 (2001).   DOI
10 C. Shi, Z. Chen, Y. Chen, and R. Yu, Anal. Methods, 7, 6840-6849 (2015).
11 C. Wu, Y. Jin, J. Zhang, Y. Ren, and Z. Jia, Chin. Chem. Lett., 24, 509-511 (2013).   DOI
12 D. D. Orsi, M. Pellegrini, S. Pichini, D. Mattioli, E. Marchei, and L. Gagliardi, J. Pharm. Biomed Anal., 48, 641-648 (2008).   DOI
13 P. Ptacek, J. Macek, and J. Klima, J. Chromatogr B, 738, 305-310 (2000).   DOI
14 P. B. Phapale, H. W. Lee, M. S. Lim, E. H. Kim, S. D. Kim, J. Park, M. Lee, S. K. Hwang, and Y. R. Yoon, J. Chromatogr B, 878, 1718-1723 (2010).   DOI
15 M. N. Pereira, H. L. Schulte, N. Duarte, E. M. Lima, L. L. Sa-Barreto, T. Gratieri, G. M. Gelfuso, and M. S. Cunha-Filho, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 96, 411-419 (2017).   DOI
16 H. Wolff, T. W. Fischer, and U. B. Peytavi, Dtsch. Arztebl. Int., 113, 377-386 (2016).
17 Y. Tsunemi, R. Irisawa, H. Yoshiie, B. Brotherton, H. Ito, R. Tsuboi, M. Kawashima, and M. Manyak, J. Dermatol., 43, 1051-1058 (2016).   DOI
18 R. Sinclai, M. Wewerinke, and D. Jolley, Br. J. Dermatol., 152, 466-473 (2005).   DOI
19 A. Yazdabadi and R. Sinclair, Aust J Dermatol., 52, 132-134 (2011).   DOI
20 B. J. W. Dixson and M. J. Rantala, Arch. Sex. Behav., 45, 877-889 (2016).   DOI
21 D. G. Barceloux and R. B. Palmer, Dis. Mon., 59, 226-248 (2013).   DOI
22 M. Maltes, J. Org. Chem., 60, 2436-3442 (1995).   DOI
23 J. Do, E. Noh, S. Yoon, J. H. Lee, S. Park, S. Mandava, S. Y. Baek, and J. Lee, Arch. Pharm. Res., 40, 736-745 (2017).   DOI
24 U. Blume-Peytavi, C. Kunte, A. Krisp, N. G. Bartels, U. Ellwanger, and R. Hoffmann, J. Dtsch. Dermatol Ges., 5, 391-395 (2007).   DOI
25 S. C. Patterson and T. Ramstad, K. A. Mills, Il Farmaco., 60, 547-554 (2005).   DOI
26 H. N. Park, J. H. Lee, S. Park, S. Y. Beak, Y. Lee, and H. Kang, J. Forensic Sci. Int., 284, 129-135 (2018).   DOI
27 J. H. Lee, H. N. Park, H. J. Park, N. S. Kim, S. Park, J. Lee, and S. Y. Beak, Food Addictives & Contaminants: Part A, 35, 2-9 (2018).   DOI