[KSCI] Korea Science Citation Index Service

http://dx.doi.org/10.5806/AST.2018.31.3.112

A comparison study of extraction methods for bio-liquid via hydrothermal carbonization of food waste

Bang, YeJin (Department of Chemistry, Seoul Women's University)
Choi, Minseon (Department of Chemistry, Seoul Women's University)
Bae, Sunyoung (Department of Chemistry, Seoul Women's University)

Publication Information

Analytical Science and Technology / v.31, no.3, 2018 , pp. 112-121 More about this Journal

Abstract

The hydrothermal carbonization method has received great attention because of the conversion process from biomass. The reaction produces various products in hydrochar, bio-liquid, and gas. Even though its yield cannot be ignored in amount, it is difficult to find research papers on bio-liquid generated from the hydrothermal carbonization reaction of biomass. In particular, the heterogeneity of feedstock composition may make the characterization of bio-liquid different and difficult. In this study, bio-liquid from the hydrothermal carbonization reaction of food wastes at $230^{\circ}C$ for 4 h was investigated. Among various products, fatty acid methyl esters were analyzed using two different extraction methods: liquid-liquid extraction and column chromatography. Different elutions with various solvents enabled us to categorize the various components. The eluents and fractions obtained from two different extraction methods were analyzed by gas chromatography with a mass spectrometer (GC/MS). The composition of the bio-liquid in each fraction was characterized, and seven fatty acid methyl esters were identified using the library installed in GC/MS device.

Keywords

Bio-liquid; Food waste; GC/MS; Column chromatography; Liquid-liquid extraction; Fatty acid methyl ester;

Citations & Related Records

Reference

1	Ministry of Environment, 2012 Statistics of treatment and waste generation in Korea, 2013.
2	M. Choi, S. Lee, and S. Bae, Anal. Sci. & Tech., 30, 174-181 (2017).
3	K. S. Ro, J. R. V. Flora, S. Bae, J. A. Libra, N. B. Berge, A. Alvarez-Murillo, and L. Li, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 5, 7317-7324 (2017). DOI
4	S. Roman, N. Berge, E. Sabio, K. Ro, L. Li, B. Ledesma, A. Alvarez-Murillo, and S. Bae, Energies., 11, 216 (2018). DOI
5	S. Xiu and A. Shahbazi, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 16, 4406-4414 (2012). DOI
6	K. Sipila, E. Kuoppala, L. Fagernas, and A. Oasmaa, Biomass Bioenergy, 14, 103-113 (1998). DOI
7	D. Mohan, C. U. Pittman, and P. H. Steele, Energ. Fuels., 20, 848-889 (2006). DOI
8	N. Mahinpey, P. Murugan, T. Mani, and R. Raina, Energ. Fuels., 23, 2736-2742 (2009). DOI
9	A. Oasmaa, E. Kuoppala, and Y. Solantausta, Energ. Fuels., 17, 1-12 (2003). DOI
10	A. Oasmaa, E. Kuoppala, and Y. Solantausta, Energ. Fuels., 17, 433-443 (2003). DOI
11	C. Amen-Chen, H. Pakdel, and C. Roy, Biomass Bioenergy, 13, 25-37 (1997). DOI
12	T. C. Ba, Energ. Fuels., 18, 188-20 (2004). DOI
13	P. Das, T. Sreelatha, and A. Ganesh, Biomass Bioenergy, 27, 265-275 (2004). DOI
14	B. Donnis, R. G. Egeberg, P. Blom, and K. G. Knudsen, Top. Catal., 52, 229-240 (2009). DOI
15	Q. Zhang, J. Chang, and Y. Xu, Energ. Fuels., 20, 2717-2720 (2006). DOI
16	M. Ertas and M. H. Alma, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 88, 22-29 (2010). DOI
17	Z. Wang, W. Lin, and W. Song, Appl. Energy, 97, 56-60 (2012). DOI