Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5806/AST.2018.31.1.14

Mainstream smoke level of harmful substances in korean domestic cigarette brands  

Choi, Hyun Doc (Chemical Analysis Center, Korea Conformity Laboratories)
Song, Seok Ho (Chemical Analysis Center, Korea Conformity Laboratories)
Cho, Hoonsik (Chemical Analysis Center, Korea Conformity Laboratories)
Kim, Hyung Kyung (Chemical Analysis Center, Korea Conformity Laboratories)
Lee, Jin-Hee (Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Advanced Analysis Team)
Yoon, Soon-Byung (Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Advanced Analysis Team)
Heo, Seok (Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Advanced Analysis Team)
Park, Hyoung-Joon (Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Advanced Analysis Team)
Publication Information
Analytical Science and Technology / v.31, no.1, 2018 , pp. 14-22 More about this Journal
Abstract
After signing the WHO FCTC in 2003, South Korea ratified the FCTC in 2005. This study was conducted to provide data on toxic constituents that can be used as useful information for the level of exposure to Korean smokers. Emissions data from five brands of cigarettes were tested under the ISO and "Canadian Intense (HCI)" smoking regimes, respectively. We conducted an analysis of 25 compounds containing nicotine, tar, carbonyls, phenolics, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and semi-VOC cigarette smoke. Tar and nicotine showed levels of 4.3 to 5.8 mg/cig and 0.4 to 0.5 mg/cig, respectively, which are within the range of tolerance presented in ISO 8243. In the case of carbonyls, formaldehyde was detected within a range of 8.2 to $14.3{\mu}g/cig$, and acetaldehyde was present within a range of 224.7 to $327.2{\mu}g/cig$ under the ISO smoke regime. Crotonaldehyde was not detected under the ISO regime, and all of the carbonyls showed values 2.3 to 4.5 times higher under the HCI regime than those under the ISO regime. Catechol, which showed a level of 47.0 to $80.5{\mu}g/cig$ under the ISO regime and 117.5 to $184.7{\mu}g/cig$ under the HCI regime, was the highest constituent among the phenols. The amount of isoprene was 91.7 to $158.3{\mu}g/cig$ under the ISO regime and 221.0 to 377.0 under the HCI regime. To summarize, most of the constituents showed a tendency to be detected at levels 2 to 4 times higher under the HCI regime than under the ISO regime. Above all, these results represent the first analysis in Korea from an independent institute of tobacco companies under accreditation of ISO 17025.
Keywords
tobacco; hazard constituents; constituents analysis; FCTC;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 D. Hammond, F. Wiebel, L. T. Kozlowski, R. Borland, K. M. Cummings, R. J. O'connor, A. McNeill, G. N. Connolly, D. Arnott, and G. T. Fong., Tob.Control., 16(1), 8-1407 (2007).
2 International Organization for Standardization, ISO 3308 (2012).
3 D. Y. Pazo, F. Moliere, M. M. Sampson, C. M. Reese, K. A. Agnew-Heard, M. J. Walters, M. R. Holman, B. C. Blount, C. H. Watson, and D. M. Chambers, Nicotine Tob. Res., 18(9), 1886-1894 (2016).   DOI
4 International Agency for Research on Cancer, Vol. 89. Lyon, FR: IARC, 427-51 (2007).
5 D. Hoffmann and I. Hoffmann, J. Toxicol. Env. Health., 50(4), 307-364 (1997).
6 International Organization for Standardization, ISO Standard 8243 (2013).
7 A. Eldridge, T. R. Betson, M. V. Gama, and K. McAdam, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 71(3), 409-427 (2015).   DOI
8 International Organization for Standardization, ISO 3402 (1999).
9 Health Canada Official Method, T-115 (1999).
10 M. Intorp, S. Purkis, M.Whittaker, and W. Wright, Beitrage zur Tabakforschung/Contributions to Tob. Res., 23(4), 161-202 (2009).
11 International Organization for Standardization, ISO 8454 (2007).
12 International Organization for Standardization, ISO 10315 (2013).
13 International Organization for Standardization, ISO 10362-1 (2013).
14 Health Canada Official Method, T-104 (1999).
15 Health Canada Official Method, T-114 (1999).
16 Health Canada Official Method, T-107 (1999).
17 Health Canada Official Method, T-116 (1999).
18 Health Canada Official Method, T-112 (1999).
19 M. Siu, N. Mladjenovic, and E. Soo, Tob. Control., 22(6), e10 (2013).   DOI
20 BAT, Smoke chemistry analysis, http://www.bat-science.com/groupms/sites/BAT_9GVJXS.nsf/vwPagesWebLive/DO7AXGGA.