Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5806/AST.2011.24.4.282

Control of relative humidity in the static bag emission test method by adding water and its effect on formaldehyde emission intensity  

Park, Cheol-Soon (Department of Environmental Science, Kangwon National University)
Yoo, Ji-Ho (Department of Environmental Science, Kangwon National University)
Kim, Man-Goo (Department of Environmental Science, Kangwon National University)
Publication Information
Analytical Science and Technology / v.24, no.4, 2011 , pp. 282-289 More about this Journal
Abstract
Rapid screening method for the determination of the emissions of pollutants from vehicle interior parts and materials have been developed as ISO 12219-2 which is using bag and based on a static condition. The method was not controlled humidity in the test bag, so it is not suitable test method for formaldehyde emission test which is highly related to humidity condition. In this study, possibility of control humidity in the static test bag by adding extra water and the effect of humidity condition for formaldehyde emissions have been investigated. The relative humidity in the test bag was affected not only amount of water added also material of test bag and test specimen. The emission intensity of formaldehyde was increased according to increasing relative humidity in test bag. But excessively supplied water was condensed on the inner surface of test bag and surface of sample specimen that were sorption formaldehyde and were reduced its emission intensity.
Keywords
Car; Automobile; cabin; VOCs; interior; bag method;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 X. Liu, M. Masonm, Z. Guo, K. Krebs and N. Roache, In Proceedings, 2009 Healthy Buildings International Conference, ISIAQ, Syracuse, NY (2009).
2 T. Godish and J. Rouch, American Industrial Hygiene Association J., 47(12), 792-797 (1986).   DOI   ScienceOn
3 W.-T. Kwon, Korean J. Sanitation, 9(1), 67-75 (1994).   과학기술학회마을
4 A. Berge and B. Mellegaard, Holz als Roh und Werkstoff, 38, 251-255 (1980).   DOI
5 T. Godish and J. Rouch, JAPCA, 35(11), 1186-1187 (1985).
6 W.-K. Jo and C.-H. Yu, Environ. Res., 86(1), 66-72 (2001).   DOI   ScienceOn
7 W. L. Lau and L. Y. Chan, Sci. Total Environ., 308, 143-55 (2003).   DOI   ScienceOn
8 L. Y. Chan and W. L. Lau, Environ. Intern., 29, 429-435 (2003).   DOI   ScienceOn
9 M. Riediker, R. Williams, R. Devlin, T. Griggs and P. Bromberg, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 2084-93 (2003).   DOI   ScienceOn
10 T. Yoshida and I. Matsunaga, Indoor and Built Environment, 15(5), 425-444 (2006).   DOI   ScienceOn
11 T. Yoshida and I. Matsunaga, Environ. Intern., 32, 58-79 (2006).   DOI   ScienceOn
12 T. Yoshida and I. Matsunaga, Indoor Built Environ., 15(5), 445-462 (2006).   DOI   ScienceOn
13 B. Ryang, S.-D. Kim and S.-K. Park, Korean Soci. Environ. Health, 32(4), 292-303 (2006).   과학기술학회마을
14 H. Cho, J.-M. Choi and W.-J. Kim, Korean Society of Environmental Health, 13(4), 283-289 (2006).
15 C. Van Netten, C. Shirtliffe and J. Svec, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 42, 558-565 (1989).   DOI
16 D. R. Spiner and R. K. Hoffman, American Society for Microbiology, 22(6), 1138-1140 (1971).
17 L. Jing and L. Zhong, Chinese J. Chemi. Eng., 16(6), 871-875 (2008).   DOI   ScienceOn