Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5806/AST.2010.23.6.607

A study on shape changes of hangul signature under the influence of alcohol  

Roh, Seung-Chan (Dept. of Scientific Criminal Investigation, Chungnam National University)
Park, Sung-Woo (Dept. of Scientific Criminal Investigation, Chungnam National University)
Kim, Jung-Ho (Legal Research and Training Institute)
Publication Information
Analytical Science and Technology / v.23, no.6, 2010 , pp. 607-614 More about this Journal
Abstract
Handwriting identifications are often faced with difficulties in evaluating handwriting by persons under the influence of alcohol. Cerebellar dysfunction is associated with deficits in the control of movement extent, as well as changes in the amplitude and relative amounts of acceleration and deceleration and action tremor. Although numerous articles are available on the subject of alcohol influence on handwriting quality, most of them were based on empirical data such as experience method, without any statistical evaluation. In this study, Hangul signature giyeok and nieun of consonant were measured in samples of handwriting. The result of this study can be used as a basic data of comparison on handwriting by identifying consistency of features and relative individualization of.
Keywords
hangul; handwriting; handwriting identification; consonant;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 K. Kim, Computer standards & interfaces., 20, 243-257(1999).   DOI   ScienceOn
2 J.-H. Kim and S.-W. Park, Anal. Sci. Tech., 23, 205-215 (2010).   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Srihari, S. N., Cha, S.-H., Arora, H. and Lee, S., J. Forensic Sci. 47, 856-872(2002).
4 Lambert Schomaker and Marius Bulacu, IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 26, 787-798(2004).   DOI   ScienceOn
5 F. Asicioglu and N. Turan, J. Forensic Sci. Int. 132, 201-210(2003)   DOI   ScienceOn
6 J. G. Phillips, R. P. Ogeil and F. Muller, Int. Graphonomics Society; Disruptions of handwriting. 2009, 619-632(2009).
7 S. Bezeau and R. Graves, J. Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 23, 399-406(2001).   DOI   ScienceOn
8 B. N. Dhawan, S. K. Bapat and V. C. Saxena, J. Pharmacol Sci. 19, 63-67(1969).
9 O. Tucha, S. Walitza and L. Mecklinger, Hum. Movement Sci. 25, 523-535(2006).   DOI   ScienceOn
10 O. Tucha, S. Aschenbrenner, P. Eichhammer, A. Putzhammer, H. Sartor and H. E. Klein et al., Psychopharmacology. 159, 211-215(2002).   DOI   ScienceOn
11 O. Tucha, L. Mecklinger, and S. Walitza, Hum. Movement Sci. 25, 536-552(2006).   DOI   ScienceOn
12 M. D. Stinson, J. Forensic Sci., 2, 411-416(1997).
13 J. Walton, J. Forensic Sci. Int., 88, 197-214(1997).   DOI   ScienceOn
14 F. Setta, J. Jacquy, J. Hildebrand and M.-U. Manto, J. Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 65, 370-373(1998).   DOI   ScienceOn
15 B. Tiplady, R. Baird, H. Lutcke, G. Drummon and P. Wright, J. Psychopharmacology, 19, 627-632(2005).   DOI
16 A. Smith, W. Sturgess and J. Gallagher, Hum. Psychopharmacol Clin Exp., 14, 473-482(1999).   DOI
17 B. Y. Choi and S. Y. Bang, Int. J. Ind. Ergonomics, 26, 549-559(2000).   DOI   ScienceOn